HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Republican Francis Rooney...

Sat Dec 23, 2017, 01:25 PM

 

Republican Francis Rooney On MSNBC Still Saying No Collusion - There Was Collusion - Say It

Just watched him say it 5 minutes ago.

There Was Collusion

Saying "no collusion" is a lie. They are lying.

Trump Tower Meeting Obvious Collusion

Newsflash: Media: Do not let any Republican get away with saying no collusion every.

Deplorables still believe no collusion. Hit them over the head repeatedly.

7 replies, 753 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 7 replies Author Time Post
Reply Republican Francis Rooney On MSNBC Still Saying No Collusion - There Was Collusion - Say It (Original post)
SeaDoo77 Dec 2017 OP
member12 Dec 2017 #1
triron Dec 2017 #2
Generic Brad Dec 2017 #3
member12 Dec 2017 #4
Cicada Dec 2017 #6
janterry Dec 2017 #5
Moral Compass Dec 2017 #7

Response to SeaDoo77 (Original post)

Sat Dec 23, 2017, 01:37 PM

1. Trump is treasonous

 

And should be tried for treason for colluding with Russians.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to member12 (Reply #1)

Sat Dec 23, 2017, 01:41 PM

2. He should be in the big house not the white one.

And a few others as well.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to member12 (Reply #1)

Sat Dec 23, 2017, 01:43 PM

3. I agree

We need to stop calling it collusion and flat out call it what it is: Treason!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Generic Brad (Reply #3)

Sat Dec 23, 2017, 01:46 PM

4. We need to stop calling it collusion and flat out call it what it is: Treason!

 

^^^100% correct.

It's TREASON. We need to IMPEACH him, then try him for TREASON.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to member12 (Reply #1)

Sat Dec 23, 2017, 01:57 PM

6. Treason requires a war enemy, Russia doesnt meet requirement

The constitution has a narrow definition of treason. The crime of treason must involve an enemy defined as a country we have declared war on or a country we are at war with, a real war not a Cold War. Trump could turn over all our classified info to Russia for a billion dollars and it would not be the crime of treason.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SeaDoo77 (Original post)

Sat Dec 23, 2017, 01:48 PM

5. He should not be given airtime

 

crap statements have no place in the news, except as an aside. There is no reason to give them serious (or respectful) airtime (imho).

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SeaDoo77 (Original post)

Sat Dec 23, 2017, 02:15 PM

7. They just redefine collusion

In the right wing mind nothing has meaning and reality is plastic and can be reshaped by mind and emotion alone.

This is what I believe Al Franken was saying when he said we are losing the truth and, indeed, may have already lost it.

It remains to be seen whether the law with itís definitive view of what constitutes legal truth can prevail given the storm of political bullshit that is about to hit in the coming year.

Everyone knows there was collusion and probably worse. The collusion is indisputable.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread