General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGlenn Greenwald condemns Hillary supporters for being mean to anti-Hillary Vanity Fair journalist
Russia-friendly journalist Glenn Greenwald has reacted to Vanity Fair telling Hillary Clinton to shut up by condemning Hillary supporters:
Link to tweet
?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet
MineralMan
(151,269 posts)No, thanks.
Glorfindel
(10,175 posts)I give a couple of "Vanity Fair" subscriptions to cousins, but I'm on the verge of asking them if they wouldn't prefer something else. "Town & Country" or "Verandah" might be a better alternative.
jmowreader
(53,194 posts)still_one
(98,883 posts)Response to estefanyo (Original post)
Post removed
marble falls
(71,932 posts)six or so different public personalities including Trump. Not very funny, but not offensive, either. The people angriest about the piece never bothered to even look at it.
If Hillary runs again I will support her all the way.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)it. I agree it would have been a milder reaction if they did a mash up of the other politicians, but what I saw was all about Hillary- and sexist AF.
marble falls
(71,932 posts)They did Trump and three or four others, too. Its too late to look up the others but the Clinton one was taken down.
I saw several of them but they left me all meh.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)You seem not to realize that Hickabee is a serial liar- and that her roasting was well earned. But HRC being told to go home and knit? Fuck that. Real democrats dont play that sort of false equivalency its all the same bullshit- especially since its all the GOP does these days.
Im shocked to see it here, such stringent defense of trashing Dems.
Hekate
(100,133 posts)StevieM
(10,578 posts)Ever since the GOP stole that fraudulent election the Hillary-haters have been relishing the opportunity to spew venom at her every chance they get. They have completely trashed her entire campaign, and her entire career, and proclaimed themselves validated.
They were actually getting ready to do this in 2008 when it looked like she was going to lose the New Hampshire primary. Then she won and they were forced to back down and basically admit that everything they had been saying was a lie.
LenaBaby61
(6,991 posts)SidDithers
(44,333 posts)Sid
Control-Z
(15,686 posts)I've heard nothing about this Vanity Fair thing until now. Was it an article or a video? And when was this? Can anyone direct me to it? Please.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)It didn't go well. I think the video has been taken down.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(135,725 posts)Lucinda
(31,170 posts)what she should be doing...one suggestion was take up knitting.
VF has lost the plot.
PragmaticDem
(320 posts)A hack!
Gothmog
(179,869 posts)Wounded Bear
(64,327 posts)everybody is just supposed to suck it up and take it and not respond or counter attack. That certainly applies to Trump and his RW syncophants, but it applies to all bullies, everywhere.
tenderfoot
(8,982 posts)oasis
(53,694 posts)Mekosoff should brush up on the lessons of Steven Covey.
maxrandb
(17,428 posts)to Fight the FUCK back "Always, Often and Repeatedly"
No slight, no insult, no bullshit story, no "bothsiderism"...NOTHING is too small to respond to, vehemently!
I will retake the "high road" as soon as we kick the living shit out of Retrumplicans and their fucking Nazi enablers all over this god damn country!
MountCleaners
(1,148 posts)Greenwald is critical of actions jointly supported by Democrats and Republicans, writing: "The worst and most tyrannical government actions in Washington are equally supported on a fully bipartisan basis."[71] In the preface to his first book, How Would a Patriot Act? (2006), Greenwald opens with some of his own personal political history describing his 'pre-political' self as neither liberal nor conservative as a whole, voting neither for George W. Bush nor for any of his rivals (indeed, not voting at all).[72]
Bush's election to the U.S. presidency "changed" Greenwald's previous uninvolved political attitude toward the electoral process "completely", and in 2006 he wrote:
Over the past five years, a creeping extremism has taken hold of our federal government, and it is threatening to radically alter our system of government and who we are as a nation. This extremism is neither conservative nor liberal in nature, but is instead driven by theories of unlimited presidential power that are wholly alien, and antithetical, to the core political values that have governed this country since its founding"; for, "the fact that this seizure of ever-expanding presidential power is largely justified through endless, rank fear-mongeringfear of terrorists, specificallymeans that not only our system of government is radically changing, but so, too, are our national character, our national identity, and what it means to be American."[72]
Believing that "It is incumbent upon all Americans who believe in that system, bequeathed to us by the founders, to defend it when it is under assault and in jeopardy. And today it is", he said: "I did not arrive at these conclusions eagerly or because I was predisposed by any previous partisan viewpoint. Quite the contrary."[72]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glenn_Greenwald
I am the same age as Greenwald. Any overprivileged dipshit who took a couple of decades to develop any sort of politics, he shouldn't have been trusted in the first place.
MrScorpio
(73,772 posts)🎻
DinahMoeHum
(23,607 posts)
Cha
(319,079 posts)person to be calling anyone out on "vitriol".