General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFor my 7000th post I would like to say how much I am looking forward to President Tom Steyer
taking office on January 20, 2021.
I look forward to celebrating the occasion here on DU!!
ProfessorGAC
(65,203 posts)He wouldn't do it. He knows that some diplomacy, legislative and foreign policy experience is needed.
He wouldn't have the hubris to run, like some other thing did.
Zoonart
(11,879 posts)I like that Steyer is running these ads, but have we not learned our lesson about electing a rich outsider to the White house?
By the time we get to 2020 the federal government is likely to be a smoking crater and we will need someone that has intimate knowledge of the inner workings of the many departments of the Federal Government so that we can rebuild. no more hobbyists... career governance is not a bad thing.
Zoonart
(11,879 posts)StevieM
(10,500 posts)It is much appreciated.
procon
(15,805 posts)to effective political acumen. Obviously, he was successful in business, and again, there's no guarantee that he could apply his skills at making himself rich to improving the public good of the whole nation.
Tom Steyer is only 60 years old. Let him first run for governor or senator in his home state of California. I'd consider voting for him, and probably many other Dems would too. He could follow a similar political path as Obama, gain some much needed experience in politics and chalk up some major accomplishments before he is ready for the presidency.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,869 posts)Steyer is doing a great service as an activist. He should keep doing that and leave the presidency to the professionals.
PragmaticDem
(320 posts)CTyankee
(63,912 posts)We should be enlarging our scope of possible candidates to include some truly fine women. We are long overdue for a female leader of our country.
StevieM
(10,500 posts)CTyankee
(63,912 posts)I think Harris and Klobuchar are contenders with good experience going in.
StevieM
(10,500 posts)I don't care for Amy Klobuchar at all.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)StevieM
(10,500 posts)Sen. Klobuchar is especially determined to reinvigorate (her word) intercountry adoptions. She doesn't seem to recognize how determined international agencies often are to get the children to market.
Many people don't grasp that the reason countries often shut down their countries to adoption is that children are being taken, by force or manipulation, from their parents and then passed off as orphans or abandoned children.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)StevieM
(10,500 posts)Amy Klobuchar seems to me to have the exact opposite goal.
She won't get my vote in the primary. If she is the nominee I will grudgingly vote for her.
There are other women who have a reasonable shot at the nomination: Elizabeth Warren, Kirsten Gillibrand, and Kamala Harris. We can nominate a woman, for president or vice-president, without nominating Amy Klobuchar.
PragmaticDem
(320 posts)CTyankee
(63,912 posts)I know that we often consider governors of states because the experience is more suitable for the job of president. But this theory was pretty much upended by our successful team of Barack Obama and Joe Biden.
PragmaticDem
(320 posts)The Senators you see named are all good and interesting people, I think a governor would be better received. I don't see anyone like Obama or Clinton in the Senate now, but time may change that.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)It will be interesting to see how they develop over the next 3 years. Too early to tell. I also like Bill de Blasio.
DavidDvorkin
(19,489 posts)PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,902 posts)but I've managed not to have heard of Tom Steyer until this thread.
Of course, there is plenty of time for him to make himself better known.
StevieM
(10,500 posts)He is also a great leader in the environmental movement.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,902 posts)I don't own a TV, which makes me very, very strange. I do watch my share of television, since so much is available via the internet. But I don't see ads, which is completely wonderful.
Are those ads running nationwide?
StevieM
(10,500 posts)I don't like the latest one because when pointing out that Trump interfered with an FBI investigation he said "he fired the FBI director" and then he showed a picture of Comey. I despise that man.
Still, most of his ads are really good.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,902 posts)is the very best thing about not having a TV. And I can watch MSNBC if I want. On the internet. A couple of hours after a show has aired. And with no ads.
Actually the single best thing about watching shows on the internet is probably that without the ads, I don't have to spend nearly as much time watching whatever show I'm viewing. Which means I get to watch more of them.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)point making. I think women would respond positively to him. We are so tired of Trump constantly shouting at us.
brooklynite
(94,741 posts)You know what they are, don't you?
StevieM
(10,500 posts)Last edited Sat Feb 10, 2018, 12:03 PM - Edit history (1)
I also like Jay Inslee, the governor of Washington. We need a good environmentalist.
I admit I have not heard him talk about foreign policy, other than the damage Trump is doing to our country abroad.
Anyway, I am pretty sure that 20 different candidates will enter the race. We will get to hear from all of them and pick our favorite. Ultimately a couple of people will likely emerge as finalists heading into Super Tuesday. I hope that one of them is making climate change priority one.
delisen
(6,044 posts)StevieM
(10,500 posts)JI7
(89,275 posts)Or serve the public in some other public way .
StevieM
(10,500 posts)that especially focuses on environmental issues. It was originally called NextGen Climate.
He actually postponed his business career after getting his MBA so he could work for Mondale.
That is good enough for me.