Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
  Post removed Mon Dec 12, 2011, 09:19 PM Dec 2011
61 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Post removed (Original Post) Post removed Dec 2011 OP
of course he can afford to do that demtenjeep Dec 2011 #1
Do you know his net worth? sadge goddess Dec 2011 #4
I will never defend any repuke demtenjeep Dec 2011 #7
$4.9 million. joshcryer Dec 2011 #14
I thought this thread title would be satire. ( n/t ) Make7 Dec 2011 #2
smile at his gimmicks, then cry over his policies if elected. leftyohiolib Dec 2011 #3
I dunno about that... sadge goddess Dec 2011 #5
Maybe ProSense Dec 2011 #30
Not more money than Obama zforce Dec 2011 #8
Smile? I wince. trotsky Dec 2011 #6
Bring it. sadge goddess Dec 2011 #10
There is this thing called "Teh Google". Ikonoklast Dec 2011 #16
LOL- Is pizza still on the menu 'round these parts? sadge goddess Dec 2011 #23
Why, since you asked, yes, yes it is. Ikonoklast Dec 2011 #46
Here you go. trotsky Dec 2011 #17
The only thing I ever agreed with Dubya (and apparently Paul) sadge goddess Dec 2011 #27
yes they should dsc Dec 2011 #53
He thinks the Civil Rights Act should be repealed. Terra Alta Dec 2011 #25
Post removed Post removed Dec 2011 #18
Another Paul fan? trotsky Dec 2011 #21
A far healthier, balanced one! sadge goddess Dec 2011 #32
I want to pay my elected officials more not less think Dec 2011 #9
I rather vote in men of integrity who take their oath to the constitution seriously. zforce Dec 2011 #26
in an ideal world that would be great. in reality we get what we pay for JMO think Dec 2011 #34
Fuck Racist Loon Ron Paul And Everyone That Wants Me To Admire Him. Ikonoklast Dec 2011 #11
Exhibit A sadge goddess Dec 2011 #13
Go away with your Paulista bullshit. Ikonoklast Dec 2011 #19
Teh overused DU phrases sadge goddess Dec 2011 #29
You must be a re-tread. Ikonoklast Dec 2011 #37
What's ProSense Dec 2011 #12
He is running for Prez now sadge goddess Dec 2011 #22
I really hope Paul doesn't run as a 3rd party Dragonbreathp9d Dec 2011 #15
Why would he take votes from Obama? toddwv Dec 2011 #33
I think he would take some votes from each Motown_Johnny Dec 2011 #39
It's nice Ron Paul can afford to only take a $39K salary Terra Alta Dec 2011 #20
California governors often take no salary. It's more of a stunt than a proposal. arcane1 Dec 2011 #24
I think you took a wrong turn somewhere guitar man Dec 2011 #28
So? I am seeing OPs on Newt, Romney, etc. sadge goddess Dec 2011 #31
Indeed, zforce Dec 2011 #36
You are a hoot. Ikonoklast Dec 2011 #38
OK. whatever you say nt zforce Dec 2011 #41
Dude---your spelling is horrible. trumad Dec 2011 #48
New keyboard:) zforce Dec 2011 #51
Yeah. It is annoying how they keep changing the key order every year. Luminous Animal Dec 2011 #58
Ron Paul is a racist asshole... Ohio Joe Dec 2011 #35
Kick Ass! arely staircase Dec 2011 #40
And you better hope that diner won't poison you. Ikonoklast Dec 2011 #42
i will heal myself with my bootstraps, dammit arely staircase Dec 2011 #44
HA! You think you'll be allowed to have boots? Ikonoklast Dec 2011 #50
Silly zforce Dec 2011 #43
That was the single most moronic thing I've read coming from the Paulistas. Ikonoklast Dec 2011 #47
Obviosuly zforce Dec 2011 #49
We currently have the strongest foreign policy president in office in the last fifty years. Ikonoklast Dec 2011 #52
LOL zforce Dec 2011 #57
oh yeah you right the president has nothing to do with domestic policy arely staircase Dec 2011 #54
He woudln't have his way zforce Dec 2011 #61
You smile at Paul's tactics like people used to smile at the weak and infirm jmowreader Dec 2011 #45
isn't one of his other ingenious proposals to ban all abortions? Warren Stupidity Dec 2011 #55
Here's your sign guitar man Dec 2011 #56
That bigoted old fool gets no smile from me Bluenorthwest Dec 2011 #59
what's so ingenious.... unkachuck Dec 2011 #60
 

sadge goddess

(42 posts)
4. Do you know his net worth?
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 09:21 PM
Dec 2011

Seriously. He hasn't been a doctor in years...What do Reps make? And has he published any books like our POTUS (now a multimillionaire).

joshcryer

(62,536 posts)
14. $4.9 million.
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 09:27 PM
Dec 2011

My moms net worth is probably $2000.

My net worth is a bit over that.

My brother's net worth is likely -$50000.

 

sadge goddess

(42 posts)
5. I dunno about that...
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 09:23 PM
Dec 2011

I am crying now at the drone attacks (Paul wants to end all military involvements, as well as close bases around the world).

I am crying at the verge of complete scariness regarding the pending Senate bill where we'd all be at risk for being disappeared.

Paul cannot dismantle Social Security by himself (and I doubt he's such a fanatic that he'd even try to encourage it).

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
30. Maybe
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 09:39 PM
Dec 2011
I am crying now at the drone attacks (Paul wants to end all military involvements, as well as close bases around the world).

I am crying at the verge of complete scariness regarding the pending Senate bill where we'd all be at risk for being disappeared.


....stop kidding yourself. Ron Paul is a racist, anti-government demagogue. Everything he does benefits the GOP and the rich.

One person voted against the original Afghanistan AUMF

Barbara Lee

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2001/roll342.xml

Ron Paul voted yes.


In 2007, the House voted to 218 to 212 to Set Date for Iraq Pullout

House, 218 to 212, Votes to Set Date for Iraq Pullout

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/24/washington/24cong.html

Ron Paul voted no.

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2007/roll186.xml


In 2007, Ron Paul introduced the Marque and Reprisal Act of 2007

Marque and Reprisal Act of 2007 - Authorizes and requests the President to issue letters of marque and reprisal to commission privately armed and equipped persons and entities to seize outside of the United States the person and property of Osama bin Laden, of any al Qaeda co-conspirator, and any conspirator with Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda who are responsible for the air piratical aggressions against the United States on September 11, 2001, and for any planned similar acts or acts of war against the United States in the future.

States that no letter of marque and reprisal shall be issued without the posting of a security bond in such amount as the President determines sufficient to ensure the letter's execution.

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-110hr3216ih/pdf/BILLS-110hr3216ih.pdf


Of course when he introduced it in 2001, it was "for the capture, alive or dead, of Osama bin Laden or any other al Qaeda conspirator"

September 11 Marque and Reprisal Act of 2001

<...>

(b) The President of the United States is authorized to place a money bounty, drawn in his discretion from the $40,000,000,000 appropriated on September 14, 2001, in the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Recovery from and Response to Terrorists Attacks on the United States or from private sources, for the capture, alive or dead, of Osama bin Laden or any other al Qaeda conspirator responsible for the act of air piracy upon the United States on September 11, 2001, under the authority of any letter of marque or reprisal issued under this Act.

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-107hr3076ih/pdf/BILLS-107hr3076ih.pdf



 

sadge goddess

(42 posts)
10. Bring it.
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 09:25 PM
Dec 2011

Tell me EXACTLY why. I keep hearing this on DU: "He's a racist" and rarely, if ever, are there any actual factoids to back up their claims.

Ikonoklast

(23,973 posts)
16. There is this thing called "Teh Google".
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 09:28 PM
Dec 2011

I suggest you learn how to use it, instead of demanding others to do the work for you.


Enjoy your stay.

Ikonoklast

(23,973 posts)
46. Why, since you asked, yes, yes it is.
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 09:59 PM
Dec 2011
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=profile&uid=278815&sub=trans


Asshat Ron Paul has idiots for cult members who don't realize he's nothing but a corporatist Republican who puts corporations before citizens, yet says "Constitution!" in order to fool the simple-minded.

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
17. Here you go.
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 09:29 PM
Dec 2011
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2011/09/07/10-quotes-that-make-ron-paul-sound-racist/

You seem like such a big Paul fan, are you sure you're on the right message board?

I call your attention to one quote in particular:

“There is no such thing as a hate crime.”

Do you agree with Ron Paul?
 

sadge goddess

(42 posts)
27. The only thing I ever agreed with Dubya (and apparently Paul)
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 09:36 PM
Dec 2011

is that they're ALL hate crimes! LOL- are you gonna tell me that a husband killing his wife when she announces she's leaving him should serve less time than someone killing another person because of their ethnicity/sexuality? That is insulting! Murder is murder!

dsc

(53,342 posts)
53. yes they should
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 10:06 PM
Dec 2011

the first person is not a general threat to society, only to those he marries. The first crime is also easier to deter. The second criminal is way more dangerous to society in that he will attack anyone he thinks is gay, or black, or whatever. It also is harder to deter hate crimes.

Terra Alta

(5,158 posts)
25. He thinks the Civil Rights Act should be repealed.
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 09:35 PM
Dec 2011

He wants to go back to the "good old days" of Jim Crow laws, businesses denying services to people of a different race, and segregated schools. Sure sounds racist to me.

Response to trotsky (Reply #6)

 

think

(11,641 posts)
9. I want to pay my elected officials more not less
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 09:25 PM
Dec 2011

but then make sure they are banned from lobbying and taking any funds from corporations. And pay them a bonus if they actually balance a budget and get America back to business!

Fuck letting the corporations own our politicians!

 

zforce

(166 posts)
26. I rather vote in men of integrity who take their oath to the constitution seriously.
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 09:35 PM
Dec 2011

If that were the case there would be a clear line separating the corporations from the politicians. Governemnt wouldn't be in the business of doing favors for corporations they would be in the business of protecting our borders and inalienable rights.

 

sadge goddess

(42 posts)
29. Teh overused DU phrases
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 09:38 PM
Dec 2011

Get new ones.

(P.S. Thanks for underscoring my suspicions about you. You. Got. Nothing. Probably just repeating what others have said but never bothered to investigate for yourself.)

Ikonoklast

(23,973 posts)
37. You must be a re-tread.
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 09:48 PM
Dec 2011

Been here all of two days, and quite familiar with what happens to morons who support racist Republicans who call themselves "Libertarians" to fool gullible witless droolers who actually believe his bullshit.

And, quite frankly, about me, you know exactly nil.

There have been others in this thread who did the work for you, but I see you choose to ignore what an asshat Paul is and not read or rebut them with factual evidence to the contrary; i.e., his voting record, any speeches he might have made, etc.

Who got nothing?

Paulistas who always use that same line about "investigating him for yourself".

Straight out of the Cult of Paul handbook.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
12. What's
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 09:26 PM
Dec 2011
To offer to take only a $39K salary as President (reflecting the country's median incomes) is a populist move that may win over a lot of voters tired of these candidates running in order to line their pockets. Whether you are on the other side, an independent or a fed-up Dem, you gotta smile at Paul's tactics.


...preventing him from foregoing his Congressional salary to prove his point?

In fact, have his kooky son join him to make a bigger statement.

 

sadge goddess

(42 posts)
22. He is running for Prez now
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 09:32 PM
Dec 2011

I believe this is something of a stunt but I think it's an ingenious one, given Romney's out-of-touch bet and Newt's hateful smearing of poor people.

This is great because it shows Paul as a caring person. I don't care for Libertarianism but I believe that we got in this clusterf*ck economy because of the war expenditures. It is also very bad karma.

The best part of this whole thing is that it is an attention-getter for a candidate marginalized by the mouthpiece for the Military Industrial Complex

Dragonbreathp9d

(2,542 posts)
15. I really hope Paul doesn't run as a 3rd party
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 09:28 PM
Dec 2011

And take votes away from Obama- but I do like this- it will be interesting to see if any other canindates even comment on this

toddwv

(2,831 posts)
33. Why would he take votes from Obama?
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 09:42 PM
Dec 2011

If anything, considering the Republican field, he would vacuum votes away from whoever manages to stumble out of that political train wreck known as the Republican primary.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
39. I think he would take some votes from each
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 09:49 PM
Dec 2011

because many younger voters like Ron Paul. Younger voters tend to vote more Democratic, so he would pull some votes from Obama.

I do think he would pull move votes from the Republican simply because most people who pay attention would be to smart to vote for crazy uncle Paul, even if they are young.


Terra Alta

(5,158 posts)
20. It's nice Ron Paul can afford to only take a $39K salary
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 09:30 PM
Dec 2011

Of course, that's what he's saying now, but if by some chance he were actually elected would he keep that promise? Luckily we'll probably never find out. Ron Paul is, and has always been, a kook.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
24. California governors often take no salary. It's more of a stunt than a proposal.
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 09:34 PM
Dec 2011

After all, as far as I know he has no problem collecting his current salary.

 

sadge goddess

(42 posts)
31. So? I am seeing OPs on Newt, Romney, etc.
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 09:40 PM
Dec 2011

I just read this on HuffPo, for your information. I am able to appreciate ideas from other parties. I think this is great.

 

zforce

(166 posts)
36. Indeed,
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 09:47 PM
Dec 2011

this a a democratic forum as is my neighborhood, though 75 percent of them are changing their vote from obama to paul because they want someone who is more "democratic" than obama. Sure they don't like most of his demoestic policies but htey are smart enough to figure out there is no way he can change demestic policy, but hey do know he has the power to dramatically change our foreign policy footprint which they wholeheartedly believe he will do unlike obama.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
40. Kick Ass!
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 09:51 PM
Dec 2011

The president and I will make the same amount of money! Though, the least among us will lose what raggedy-assed social safety net is left. People can smoke pot - during the two hours a day they aren't working at their dangerous, underpaid jobs (as long as the boss is OK with it since he can still piss test them.) and my wife and kids won't be able to join me at the "Whites Only" diner.

But other than those minor things - what a brilliant idea!

 

zforce

(166 posts)
43. Silly
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 09:54 PM
Dec 2011

without getting into an argument as to why that would never be the case you can be rest assured Paul's presidency would NOT have the power to change domestic policy, though it would change foreign policy in our favor.

Ikonoklast

(23,973 posts)
52. We currently have the strongest foreign policy president in office in the last fifty years.
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 10:05 PM
Dec 2011

You don't know what the hell you are talking about.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
54. oh yeah you right the president has nothing to do with domestic policy
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 10:08 PM
Dec 2011

if ron paul had his way there would be no medicare, medicaid, social security, progressive income tax, minimum wage, worker safety laws, federaly subsidized school lunches and breakfasts, federal student loans or "evil" federal "goons" telling private property owners such as restaurant owners that they can't refuse my family service.

Don't act like you don't know these things. Sure, maybe he couldn't get those things done - but not for lack of trying.

Thanks but no thanks - I'll take my whishy-washy, moderate dem. prez over a right wing utopian (dystopian) enemy of every social policy that has helped the poor, elderly and working class American for three-quarters of a century

 

zforce

(166 posts)
61. He woudln't have his way
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 10:13 PM
Dec 2011

He could try to convince people and the congress but I am sure its not going to work, but in the meantime with all that money coming back from the military it would be much easier to fund those programs.

jmowreader

(53,007 posts)
45. You smile at Paul's tactics like people used to smile at the weak and infirm
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 09:59 PM
Dec 2011

This is Ron Paul's Plan to Restore America:

http://www.ronpaul2012.com/the-issues/ron-paul-plan-to-restore-america/

It's more like "Ron Paul's Plan to Restore America to 1865." He also wants a federal "Right to Work" law, so we can finally get rid of those pesky unions once and for all. Oh yeah: he wants to get rid of the IRS, without explaining how he expects the taxes to be collected without a tax collection agency.

Seriously. Elect me President, and the first thing I will do is to propose the "Get Rid of the Republican Party Before It Gets Rid of Us Act" be passed into law.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
59. That bigoted old fool gets no smile from me
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 10:11 PM
Dec 2011

Convoluted, self contradictory, homophobic, racist, sexist. delusional man who is worth millions and thinks he can pretend otherwise. Why would a millionaire like him need to take any salary at all?

 

unkachuck

(6,295 posts)
60. what's so ingenious....
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 10:13 PM
Dec 2011

....about this blatantly obvious proposal?....every 'stump' in this country understands, "...poor people don't run for president."

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Post removed