General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPost removed
demtenjeep
(31,997 posts)he has lots already
sadge goddess
(42 posts)Seriously. He hasn't been a doctor in years...What do Reps make? And has he published any books like our POTUS (now a multimillionaire).
demtenjeep
(31,997 posts)he obviously has enough money he can run multiple times
joshcryer
(62,536 posts)My moms net worth is probably $2000.
My net worth is a bit over that.
My brother's net worth is likely -$50000.
Make7
(8,550 posts)leftyohiolib
(5,917 posts)sadge goddess
(42 posts)I am crying now at the drone attacks (Paul wants to end all military involvements, as well as close bases around the world).
I am crying at the verge of complete scariness regarding the pending Senate bill where we'd all be at risk for being disappeared.
Paul cannot dismantle Social Security by himself (and I doubt he's such a fanatic that he'd even try to encourage it).
ProSense
(116,464 posts)I am crying at the verge of complete scariness regarding the pending Senate bill where we'd all be at risk for being disappeared.
....stop kidding yourself. Ron Paul is a racist, anti-government demagogue. Everything he does benefits the GOP and the rich.
One person voted against the original Afghanistan AUMF
Barbara Lee
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2001/roll342.xml
Ron Paul voted yes.
In 2007, the House voted to 218 to 212 to Set Date for Iraq Pullout
House, 218 to 212, Votes to Set Date for Iraq Pullout
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/24/washington/24cong.html
Ron Paul voted no.
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2007/roll186.xml
In 2007, Ron Paul introduced the Marque and Reprisal Act of 2007
States that no letter of marque and reprisal shall be issued without the posting of a security bond in such amount as the President determines sufficient to ensure the letter's execution.
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-110hr3216ih/pdf/BILLS-110hr3216ih.pdf
Of course when he introduced it in 2001, it was "for the capture, alive or dead, of Osama bin Laden or any other al Qaeda conspirator"
September 11 Marque and Reprisal Act of 2001
(b) The President of the United States is authorized to place a money bounty, drawn in his discretion from the $40,000,000,000 appropriated on September 14, 2001, in the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Recovery from and Response to Terrorists Attacks on the United States or from private sources, for the capture, alive or dead, of Osama bin Laden or any other al Qaeda conspirator responsible for the act of air piracy upon the United States on September 11, 2001, under the authority of any letter of marque or reprisal issued under this Act.
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-107hr3076ih/pdf/BILLS-107hr3076ih.pdf
zforce
(166 posts)But anyways, yeah we'll cry over ending the wars.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)He's a pandering buffoon with racist radical views that have no place in modern society.
sadge goddess
(42 posts)Tell me EXACTLY why. I keep hearing this on DU: "He's a racist" and rarely, if ever, are there any actual factoids to back up their claims.
Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)I suggest you learn how to use it, instead of demanding others to do the work for you.
Enjoy your stay.
sadge goddess
(42 posts)Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)Asshat Ron Paul has idiots for cult members who don't realize he's nothing but a corporatist Republican who puts corporations before citizens, yet says "Constitution!" in order to fool the simple-minded.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)You seem like such a big Paul fan, are you sure you're on the right message board?
I call your attention to one quote in particular:
There is no such thing as a hate crime.
Do you agree with Ron Paul?
sadge goddess
(42 posts)is that they're ALL hate crimes! LOL- are you gonna tell me that a husband killing his wife when she announces she's leaving him should serve less time than someone killing another person because of their ethnicity/sexuality? That is insulting! Murder is murder!
dsc
(53,342 posts)the first person is not a general threat to society, only to those he marries. The first crime is also easier to deter. The second criminal is way more dangerous to society in that he will attack anyone he thinks is gay, or black, or whatever. It also is harder to deter hate crimes.
Terra Alta
(5,158 posts)He wants to go back to the "good old days" of Jim Crow laws, businesses denying services to people of a different race, and segregated schools. Sure sounds racist to me.
Response to trotsky (Reply #6)
Post removed
trotsky
(49,533 posts)What message board am I on?
sadge goddess
(42 posts)think
(11,641 posts)but then make sure they are banned from lobbying and taking any funds from corporations. And pay them a bonus if they actually balance a budget and get America back to business!
Fuck letting the corporations own our politicians!
zforce
(166 posts)If that were the case there would be a clear line separating the corporations from the politicians. Governemnt wouldn't be in the business of doing favors for corporations they would be in the business of protecting our borders and inalienable rights.
think
(11,641 posts)Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)Paulistas can all go piss up a rope.
sadge goddess
(42 posts)Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)"Teh Google", use it.
sadge goddess
(42 posts)Get new ones.
(P.S. Thanks for underscoring my suspicions about you. You. Got. Nothing. Probably just repeating what others have said but never bothered to investigate for yourself.)
Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)Been here all of two days, and quite familiar with what happens to morons who support racist Republicans who call themselves "Libertarians" to fool gullible witless droolers who actually believe his bullshit.
And, quite frankly, about me, you know exactly nil.
There have been others in this thread who did the work for you, but I see you choose to ignore what an asshat Paul is and not read or rebut them with factual evidence to the contrary; i.e., his voting record, any speeches he might have made, etc.
Who got nothing?
Paulistas who always use that same line about "investigating him for yourself".
Straight out of the Cult of Paul handbook.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)...preventing him from foregoing his Congressional salary to prove his point?
In fact, have his kooky son join him to make a bigger statement.
sadge goddess
(42 posts)I believe this is something of a stunt but I think it's an ingenious one, given Romney's out-of-touch bet and Newt's hateful smearing of poor people.
This is great because it shows Paul as a caring person. I don't care for Libertarianism but I believe that we got in this clusterf*ck economy because of the war expenditures. It is also very bad karma.
The best part of this whole thing is that it is an attention-getter for a candidate marginalized by the mouthpiece for the Military Industrial Complex
Dragonbreathp9d
(2,542 posts)And take votes away from Obama- but I do like this- it will be interesting to see if any other canindates even comment on this
toddwv
(2,831 posts)If anything, considering the Republican field, he would vacuum votes away from whoever manages to stumble out of that political train wreck known as the Republican primary.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)because many younger voters like Ron Paul. Younger voters tend to vote more Democratic, so he would pull some votes from Obama.
I do think he would pull move votes from the Republican simply because most people who pay attention would be to smart to vote for crazy uncle Paul, even if they are young.
Terra Alta
(5,158 posts)Of course, that's what he's saying now, but if by some chance he were actually elected would he keep that promise? Luckily we'll probably never find out. Ron Paul is, and has always been, a kook.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)After all, as far as I know he has no problem collecting his current salary.
guitar man
(15,996 posts)This is a Democratic forum.
sadge goddess
(42 posts)I just read this on HuffPo, for your information. I am able to appreciate ideas from other parties. I think this is great.
this a a democratic forum as is my neighborhood, though 75 percent of them are changing their vote from obama to paul because they want someone who is more "democratic" than obama. Sure they don't like most of his demoestic policies but htey are smart enough to figure out there is no way he can change demestic policy, but hey do know he has the power to dramatically change our foreign policy footprint which they wholeheartedly believe he will do unlike obama.
Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)You fool no one here, please believe me, we are all smarter than that.
zforce
(166 posts)trumad
(41,692 posts)zforce
(166 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Ohio Joe
(21,896 posts)Nothing he says is going to win me over. or make me smile. He is a dangerous loon.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)The president and I will make the same amount of money! Though, the least among us will lose what raggedy-assed social safety net is left. People can smoke pot - during the two hours a day they aren't working at their dangerous, underpaid jobs (as long as the boss is OK with it since he can still piss test them.) and my wife and kids won't be able to join me at the "Whites Only" diner.
But other than those minor things - what a brilliant idea!
Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)Paul wants to eliminate the FDA.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)then back to work.
Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)Ron Paul's policies, if implemented, would make Feudalism look good.
zforce
(166 posts)without getting into an argument as to why that would never be the case you can be rest assured Paul's presidency would NOT have the power to change domestic policy, though it would change foreign policy in our favor.
Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)And that's saying a LOT.
zforce
(166 posts)You don't undertand the power of the presidency.
Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)You don't know what the hell you are talking about.
indeed the strongest foreign policy with regard to enhancing Bush's policy.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)if ron paul had his way there would be no medicare, medicaid, social security, progressive income tax, minimum wage, worker safety laws, federaly subsidized school lunches and breakfasts, federal student loans or "evil" federal "goons" telling private property owners such as restaurant owners that they can't refuse my family service.
Don't act like you don't know these things. Sure, maybe he couldn't get those things done - but not for lack of trying.
Thanks but no thanks - I'll take my whishy-washy, moderate dem. prez over a right wing utopian (dystopian) enemy of every social policy that has helped the poor, elderly and working class American for three-quarters of a century
zforce
(166 posts)He could try to convince people and the congress but I am sure its not going to work, but in the meantime with all that money coming back from the military it would be much easier to fund those programs.
jmowreader
(53,007 posts)This is Ron Paul's Plan to Restore America:
http://www.ronpaul2012.com/the-issues/ron-paul-plan-to-restore-america/
It's more like "Ron Paul's Plan to Restore America to 1865." He also wants a federal "Right to Work" law, so we can finally get rid of those pesky unions once and for all. Oh yeah: he wants to get rid of the IRS, without explaining how he expects the taxes to be collected without a tax collection agency.
Seriously. Elect me President, and the first thing I will do is to propose the "Get Rid of the Republican Party Before It Gets Rid of Us Act" be passed into law.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)why yes it is.
guitar man
(15,996 posts)
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Convoluted, self contradictory, homophobic, racist, sexist. delusional man who is worth millions and thinks he can pretend otherwise. Why would a millionaire like him need to take any salary at all?
unkachuck
(6,295 posts)....about this blatantly obvious proposal?....every 'stump' in this country understands, "...poor people don't run for president."
