Did You Know: Anyone Opposing Chelsea Manning's Senate Bid Has An Old Straight White Man Fetish?
According to Glenn Greenwald this is absolutely the case because:
“ . . . Democrats [have] so quickly decided to back a white, straight male politician steeped in privilege, while devoting themselves to opposing a candidate who would make history by becoming the first trans woman ever elected to the U.S. Senate, in the process inspiring trans youth around the world and helping to erode the stigma that has made them so vulnerable to discrimination and violence?”
They’ve decided to do this presumably because they find Cardin’s centrist ideology and politics more appealing than Manning’s more radical politics, and believe that this trumps what could be the historic value of Manning’s candidacy. They’ve apparently decided to prioritize their own centrist ideology over the important gender, sexual orientation and trans equality progress that Manning’s victory would ensure.”
Greenwald also states that Cardin’s career has been unremarkable with few accomplishments. But far worse: he’s a . . . vile centrist!
Ben Cardin’s unremarkable career can be found in his official Senate bio here:
https://www.cardin.senate.gov/about
I find his advocacy for the Chesapeake Bay Project particularly irritating. I mean who needs clean water or National parks?
And here:
"He led the fight for the Patients' Bill of Rights and, because of his efforts, the law ensures that individuals in private health insurance plans have the right to choose their primary care provider, women have direct access to an ob/gyn, and patients with medical emergencies are guaranteed coverage for necessary ER visits."
Horrific!
But just take a gander where Cardin ranks according to Govtrack:
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/benjamin_cardin/400064
The tracking graph is based on voting history and where in the leadership pack an individual falls. Curiously, Cardin is at the top of the leadership graph. Really! The grotesque nerve of the man wheedling his way to Ranking Member of the Foreign Relations Committee, he Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works or the Committee on Finance, yada, yada.
Then, unlike some Senators I could mention, he was a primary sponsor of 18 bills that were actually enacted, as in:
S.1221 Countering Russian Influence in Europe and Eurasia Act of 2017
S.284 Global Magnitsky Human Rights Acountability Act
S.599 Improving Access to Emergency Psychiatric Care
A glance at the graph indicates that Cardin’s overall voting history puts him in the same category as Leahy, Wyden and Booker. Should we primary these senators as well? How about Kaine, Coons or Duckworth because these members are to the right of Cardin?
His voting record has afforded him a 100% by the Human Rights Campaign, 100% by the Planned Parenthood Action Fund and 92% by the League of Conservation Voters.
He must be stopped!!
This is why I rarely pull up Greenwald’s columns anymore.
Btw, when I mused about who exactly was backing/advocating Ms Manning’s primary bid?
I think I found my answer.
https://theintercept.com/2018/01/15/centrist-dems-launch-smear-campaign-against-young-trans-woman-all-to-keep-an-old-straight-white-man-in-power/
= new reply since forum marked as read
but CM choosing this upcoming election and this particular seat to fight for doesn't make any sense to me. Why doesn't she find a Republican seat at the federal, state, or local level to start with? It's so weird how progressive activists always seem to target current Democratic officeholders moreso than Republican-held seats. Why is that?
And is authoring a huge document on Russian interference in western elections. Call it a hunch, but I think this is a bad deal and could potentially be dangerous. I support Ms. Manning, but I think she is doing this for all the wrong reasons. 
We lost those famous 3 states by less than the number of declared Democrats/progressive independents who went to Jill Stein alone. Then there were the others who also, persuaded by the Greenwald-type agitators to reject Democrats, voted Trump, libertarian, or not at all.
Anything but Democrats because, as the Greenwalds pushed, pushed, pushed, our candidates were just too corrupt to support and people needed to better, moral choices.
Same propaganda being pushed right here, right now on DU for the midterms.
And scolded us "vagina voters" for supporting her just cause she's female?
Also interesting that the pro-Manning camp was, just a week ago, anti-Oprah bc she didn't have political experience.
I actually missed this piece. Can't say I'm sorry about that either. 
This garbage is exactly why The Trumpster is sitting in the WH, pretending to be King. Hope GG and his BFs are happy. Because they certainly aren't/weren't wise. But then, Greenwald had other pressing matters--wondering if or a movie was going to be made about him and Snowden. Yeah, that James Bond is so-o-o dumb. We all share his anxiety, I'm sure.
Ugh!
recall that exchange. And many others. Curious how it's always the Democratic leadership that's targeted, must be removed, off with their heads, yada, yada, yada.
Seems as if there are plenty of GOP seats to challenge, no??
Strange that. Good thing I'm not the suspicious type.
