Message auto-removed

[Name removed]

[Agschmid]

1. No.

[Cha]

10. ..

oh no

[Hekate]

16. ...

What a night for division.

[demmiblue]

2. ...

[TexasProgresive]

3. No whos saying that?

[still_one]

4. They endorsed the Democratic nominee, and if you are wise you would best leave it at that

[The Velveteen Ocelot]

5. No; DU didn't "endorse" either candidate during the primaries.

However, the TOS mean DUers would be expected to support, or at least not speak against, the eventual nominee.

[democratisphere]

6. Bernie who?

[Akoto]

7. No, DU did not endorse him. n/t

[Dr Hobbitstein]

8. DU, as an entity, has never officially endorsed a primary candidate.

Our membership, like the Democratic Party, is vast and varied. However, the site does endorse the Democratic candidate.

[Maine-i-acs]

9. Concern and low post count noted. nt

[FSogol]

11. Divide! Divide! Divide!

[RandiFan1290]

12. Welcome Back to DU!

[Hekate]

13. Mariesa, those posts are awfully close to violating the TOS about not refighting the primaries ...

DU does not "endorse" primary candidates. We duke it out while the rest of the nation dukes it out.

Then, when the nominee becomes apparent, and especially when the DNC has formally nominated a candidate, DU's rules regarding supporting the nominee come into play.

Per the TOS we all sign, DU exists to support Democratic officeholders and Democratic candidates. Not Greens, Independents, Libertarians, Socialists, Wobblies, or Republicans. And it is counterproductive as hell to refight the primaries.

[Raine]

15. Huh?