Is Trump Administration Protecting Goldman Sachs RICO Indictment

[laserhaas]

Last edited Thu Feb 8, 2018, 11:15 AM - Edit history (1)

There's abundant evidence that Goldman Sachs is involved in ongoing organized crimes and obstruction of justice; which has been insulated from prosecution by bad faith federal prosecutors directly connected to the perpetrators.

Jay Clayton's SEC is protecting Goldman Sachs from prosecution; and Clayton is confident in his authority, the SEC is now considering blocking investor lawsuits against Wall Street.



.

According to the new article on Activist Post
https://www.activistpost.com/2018/02/trumps-administration-obstructs-justice-in-goldman-sachs-cases.html

Everybody can plainly see that Trump’s campaign promises to drain the swamp of Goldman Sachs is absolute malarkey. If you can’t, you may be stuck in the denial phase of promises of change that Obama supporters years ago believed was coming to no avail.

Not only has the current POTUS breached his promises, what we have – arguably – is a White House cabinet stuffed to the cream filling oozing with Goldman Sachs personnel.

Back in November 2016, Politico pointed out that Steve Mnuchin, Steve Bannon (now resigned), Anthony Scaramucci and Gary Cohn are all Goldman Sachs alumni.

In March 2017, the Congressional news website – The Hill– pointed out Trump had nominated two other Goldman Sachs alum, James Donovan, and Dina Powell.

Fingerhut, Mattel/ Learning and eToys cases are $5 Billion in fraud; which Goldman Sachs has been Obstructing Justice, about, for more than a decade.

To assure Goldman Sachs never gets indicted, the powers that be have handpicked persons (Colm Connolly, James Lackner, Mark Kenney, Ellen Slights etc.) to become federal agents, federal prosecutors, the head of the SEC and current nominees for the federal bench.

Over 100 state & federal felony violations and confessions in the record; but no investigations or prosecutions due to - observeable - federal corruption.

Where do you go when the Department of Justice is willfully blind, or duplicitous?

Trump’s Administration Obstructs Justice in Goldman Sachs Cases:

Link to tweet

.

...Jay Clayton’s SEC Protects Wall Street Racketeering
https://www.activistpost.com/2017/12/jay-claytons-sec-protects-wall-street-racketeering.html

.
.

..... How Goldman Sachs And Bain Capital Defrauded Mattel Investors And Got Off Scot-Free

https://www.activistpost.com/2017/08/learning-company-goldman-sachs-bain-capital-connections-mattel.html .

12 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
	Justice must come against Goldman Sachs
	12 (100%)
	Trump's pick of GSachs personnel permanently guarantees no prosecution of Goldman Sachs
	0 (0%)
	Who cares
	0 (0%)
	0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided.
Show usernames Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll

[Angry Dragon]

1. KICK

[laserhaas]

2. Thanks

[heaven05]

3. Well

The chickens HAVE come home to roost. This system of money and avarice finally has shown me and many others just how heavily corruptable and just plain corrupt the people are running it and protecting it. Oh what the hell. It's the most racist, sexist, anti immigration administration this country has ever fielded. Well women voted for this, AA and many brown people voted for this. Gays voted for this. 66 million floating turds wanted these chickens to roost...you got it and I say you deserve this. Malcom X was so right then and we are so right now. The el presidente wants a military strike errr parade to let the american people know he has the power and it's growing in the military. Most Army officers of senior rank, colonel and up, are RW and fascist.

Well ameriKKKa has finally shown it's true nature in it's culture and governance. 8 years of class and beauty followed by this TRASH running ameriKKKa.

[laserhaas]

7. It truly is pathetic, our state of affairs

[TexasProgresive]

4. Could you define and use in a sentence the word inductment?

That is a very obscure word. The only reference I could find is from arguements to the Alabama Supreme Court, Greil Bros. Co., et al. v. McLain, and I am to ignorant to make out what it means.

4) If the statement was made to appellee by or for appellant that the exercise commission had transferred, or authorized the transfer by Powell to appellant of, the license, and that this was lawful authority for complainant to transact the desired business at No. 944 Bell street, when in fact such authorized transfer had not been made as required by the statute, and McLain acted on such statement as the inductment to the purchase, it was such a misrepresentation as may avoid the executory part of the contract of purchase. It was the duty of the party making the inducing representations to have obtained accurate information as to the compliance with the legal requirements for the transfer of the license, before its sale and attempted transfer, and receiving the consideration therefor.

(5, 6) One who is negotiating a sale must not recklessly or even innocently assert that as a fact which is untrue, if such asserted fact be to any extent an inductment to the other party to enter into the contract. It is as much a fraud to affirm as true that which is untrue, though not known to be so, as it is to assert as true that which is untrue and known to be so.—Code 1907, §§ 4298, 4299; Prestwood v. Carlton, supra; Jordan v. Pickett, supra; Ball v. Farley, supra; Henry v. Allen, 93 Ala. 197, 9 South. 579. “Honest belief in the truth of an inducing statement of fact will exculpate from moral fault, but does not relieve from legal liability to make good."—Prestwood v. Carlton^ supra.

https://books.google.com/books?id=q8IKAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA140&lpg=PA140&dq=inductment&source=bl&ots=EvTGvxha1x&sig=az4OwfPb9u62ujamvbGvqLHuaXA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjxxsa_vpbZAhWI6oMKHRoqAooQ6AEIZzAK#v=onepage&q=inductment&f=false

[laserhaas]

5. Puhhlleeaassee

Dang typo police

[laserhaas]

6. Adding Links to other stories germane

3 different HuffPo reporters asked questions; but have gone silent.

None asked about Romney.