General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMy FBI/Ex-wife story
Many years ago, my ex-husband was nominated by the then president for a top federal job. One day I came home from work and found the business card of an FBI Agent on my front door with a note to call him. It was interesting to me (and a little bit creepy) that he had come to my home without calling me first. Anyway, the next day I called him back. He told me that he wanted to speak to me about my ex and that we could do it over the phone or in person. I opted for the phone. He asked me when and how long we had been married, how many children and other general background stuff. Then he got down to cases: had he ever abused me or my child; did he have money, drug or alcohol issues; what was the worst thing he had ever done to me. I answered no to all of the questions except the last one and I told him that I thought the question was very leading (I'm a lawyer, btw). I then told him that as far as I was concerned, my ex's appointment was an excellent one and the President would be glad he made it. The agent actually laughed and said that he very seldom had an interview with an ex-wife like this one.
In reading and seeing the account of Porter's ex-wives, I thought back to my interview and one thing is clear to me: in answering the agent's questions, I absolutely had to be honest, I had to tell the truth no matter what that brought. These women were under the same obligation and they did the right thing. These women were not giving gratuitous interviews to Doctor Phil. They were talking to the FBI.
Anyway, that's my story FWIW.
hlthe2b
(102,112 posts)would be a real anomaly... So RWers who want to claim "Ex-spouses" lie show themselves as the asses they are.
flibbitygiblets
(7,220 posts)GOP is still the party of anti women (also anti POC, anti gay etc , aka pro-white men), and will continue to be until we rise up and make them irrelevant.
IronLionZion
(45,380 posts)Or a gay ex-partner
flibbitygiblets
(7,220 posts)complaining they've been physically or sexually abused, do we? Or did I miss that? No ex-gay lovers, or male ex husbands of anyone in team trump are complaining to my knowledge.
Thus behavior has a pattern. Only women are alleging abuse, and they're being called liars. So your point, while technically possible, is inapplicable and therefore unhelpful.
mythology
(9,527 posts)Doesn't mean that the claims shouldn't be investigated as though they are real.
And statistically speaking there are multiple men and other women in the Trump who are being abused (physically or emotionally) by their partners we don't know about.
Corgigal
(9,291 posts)I worked for a giant agency in Florida, they knocked on all my neighbors doors. I also applied for the Dept Of a Justice, they contacted everyone. Even people you had no clue they would. They run your credit, talk to everyone.
Hell, when my daughter entered the Coast Guard, they contacted her high school, present employer and more people then we could imagine. I personally have no problem with that, I had a secret clearance and my daughter got, with out asking, a top secret clearance.
It's the way, we're suppose to work. Our backgrounds matter. Future behavior, in reference to past behavior.
Thanks for sharing your story.
IronLionZion
(45,380 posts)Thanks to your daughter for her service. I love the Coast Guard. They really value their people a lot.
MontanaMama
(23,294 posts)I can add to this...my husband coached Little League team with one of our neighbors for years. The neighbor has a son the same age as ours. A couple years ago, the neighbor applied for a federal job (in intelligence, I believe) that required an extensive background check. An FBI agent called my husband and came to our house to interview him about our neighbor. The interview took well over an hour. He asked questions about what my husband knew about our neighbor's income, work history, what kind of a coach he was, what was his demeanor with children, what he knew about the neighbor's marriage on and on and on. The agent asked the same questions in different ways to see if my husbands answers would change. It was a fascinating and somewhat stressful conversation. The FBI doesn't mess around.
SCantiGOP
(13,862 posts)The job required a top security clearance. The military investigators asked my parents for the names of 4 people that he had known since High School. My Dad later asked one of them if he had been contacted. He said yes, but that all he was asked was.......the names of 4 people who had known him since High School.
They obviously were not going to trust a parent to give out the name of someone that might not give good answers to the interview.
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,947 posts)SunSeeker
(51,508 posts)brush
(53,738 posts)One doesn't expect to see that archaic usage on a progressive board.
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,947 posts)On the other hand, is the NAACP stuck in the 1950s and irrelevant for some decades now?
Yes, you are correct, the "preferred" designation these days is "people of color".
SCantiGOP
(13,862 posts)a person of non-color?
(just joking, sense of humor please)
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,947 posts)BamaRefugee
(3,483 posts)Unless FORCED TO by a speechwriter and even then he probably gags as he says it.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)current programs
NAACP Programs & Departments
1. Education
2. Federal Advocacy
3. Health
4. Civic Engagement
5. Economic Opportunity
6. Criminal Justice
7. Environmental &
Climate Justice
OUR MISSION IS TO ENSURE THE POLITICAL, EDUCATIONAL, SOCIAL, AND ECONOMIC EQUALITY OF RIGHTS OF ALL PERSONS AND TO ELIMINATE RACE-BASED DISCRIMINATION. AND WEVE BEEN DOING IT SINCE 1909.
Doesn't sound like you "prefer" people of color as a term but please be advised they are working for the rights of all people in many of thier initiatives
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,947 posts)"People of color" is a perfectly fine term.
Do not assume too much about me.
Raine1967
(11,589 posts)Neighbors, friends etc. and I have been used as a reference for about three friends seeking clearance for any number of jobs.
The interviews were very much like what you described. Similar questions as well!
HipChick
(25,485 posts)I've done federal work for a while, and a lot of my neighbors are involved with that type of work - And yes, they have come to my house, called, and hunted me down...you have to tell the absolute truth...
mountain grammy
(26,598 posts)I was surprised at how personal the questions were, but I answered every one to the best of my ability.. if I didn't know the answer, that was my answer, I don't know. The agent seemed fine with that. Interesting experience. the agent was so respectful, intelligent and just nice.
NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)Rarely did they lie and when they did, reminding them that lying is a federal offense, they recanted.
There is no way given what I know of investigations and this administration that half of those fools would get a clearance. That these people couldn't get clearances but were given access is unfathomable to me (no not really, but in a pre-trump world it would be).
Nothing matters anymore. No rules must be followed anymore. It's a damn shame too.
Ligyron
(7,615 posts)Wonder who else has access to TS info in Trump's WH without a clearance? Stephen Miller comes to mind right off the bat.
Raven
(13,877 posts)there was absolutely no assurance that it would be kept confidential.
MontanaMama
(23,294 posts)I am doubting that Stephen Miller got a clearance with his sketchy background but until this Rob Porter fiasco, I hadn't thought too much about it. Just how many are there on the WH staff without them? Good gawd.
marylandblue
(12,344 posts)grantcart
(53,061 posts)Just like any task you do with a lot of repetition you get to be really good at it.
If the FBI contacted 24 people who basically said the same positive thing but one ex wife gave a negative response they would note it but not give it much weight.
If however they contacted 24 people and got 18 positive responses and a couple who said that they new he cold be explosive, a couple more who had a confrontation with him and 2 ex-wives that gave nearly identical responses they would give it a lot of weight.
For just a normal person its pretty difficult to not get a security clearance, especially if you have had government positions before.
My guess is that the FBI found the ex wives 100% trustworthy and that other facts also exist about Porter.
Justice
(7,185 posts)an affidavit.
Mr.Bill
(24,228 posts)they did a federal background check on me that cost $1400.
llmart
(15,532 posts)and not only did they do a background check, they fingerprinted me. So, once again Trump and his lackeys are liars. But we knew that already, didn't we?
electron_blue
(3,592 posts)Soon after my ex-husband and I divorced he was up for a job that required top-secret clearance. I got the interview and got the same kinds of questions that you describe. I basically lied and said he never abused me or our child. I said he never did anything bad to me, that it was just one of those things that we fell apart. The truth is that I was terrified of my ex. I lived in fear day and night that he was going to break in and attack me and kill me. He had threatened it. So - him having a job clear across the country was the best thing that could have ever happened for me and my (our) child. My replies were all about getting him the job. You may judge me, but he was a major physical threat to me and my child.
So - maybe one shouldn't always trust an ex-wife's words.
Just sayin'
MontanaMama
(23,294 posts)In a life and death situation, you do what is necessary to protect your child. I wonder if the FBI agent knew anything about what had happened to you before your interview?
electron_blue
(3,592 posts)A year before, my ex had undergone (and failed) a county sponsored anger management program. But, just by talking to his friends, coworkers and neighbors, the agent would not have learned about the abuse. I had also stayed one night in a women's shelter, but that was supposed to be private. Who knows. Anyways... so glad that is many years behind me. I am really hoping this country goes through a cultural shift in the next 5-10 years. Maybe it will finally happen. Either that, or get worse.
Justice
(7,185 posts)I hope you are well and happy. No judging here.
LisaM
(27,792 posts)who must have applied to work at the FBI and an agent came (unannounced) to interview me. He was absolutely professional from tip to tail. I found it an encouraging and positive experience too.
HipChick
(25,485 posts)LisaM
(27,792 posts)But I got the feeling my neighbor had actually applied to get into the FBI itself.
HipChick
(25,485 posts)When I would switch jobs or agencies ....
Upthevibe
(8,009 posts)unacceptable (so many things with these nightmare people are) that they have (Kushner-WTF??!!) people in these positions w/o clearance!!!
KT2000
(20,567 posts)and other questions about Russians is what they asked neighbors of a friend who had a government job processing retirements etc. I wonder if they leave those questions out now.
Dem_4_Life
(1,765 posts)That is a very interesting story.
As the daughter of a prosecutor I have always found the details of how the FBI agents and police do their jobs. For the most part they are all fantastic people and their jobs are very interesting.
There is an FBI building close to my job and every time I drive by I wonder how many times they have been involved in these Russia investigations LOL.
And I love the fact that our San Antonio police chief is very outspoken about standing up to human rights and against Trump's policies.
marlakay
(11,425 posts)My daughter moved to San Antonio area last year, makes me feel better.
Dem_4_Life
(1,765 posts)Also our new mayor is amazing and so far better than Julian Castro! He will be someone to watch later.
Overall SA is very safe and a big city that feels like a small town and neighborly.
mainer
(12,017 posts)It was for Air Force top security clearance, and the agent (a woman) came to my house. Asked all sorts of questions like "to your knowledge, has this employee ever had relationships with women who were not American citizens?" Weird stuff. Anyway, I really, really didn't want to lose this employee because he was so great, and I laughingly told her I might have to lie because I didn't want to lose him. She didn't think it was funny.
HipChick
(25,485 posts)as he lied about dating a Chinese National...he was not able to re-up his security clearance, and without it he had to leave...
dchill
(38,433 posts)Informative and relevant.
kwassa
(23,340 posts)for a security clearance. She was listening in the next room.
She got it.
Many years later, two cousins of hers became FBI agents.
dlk
(11,511 posts)ROB-ROX
(767 posts)This story is about an interview. Normally, interviews are handled by a government agent versus the FBI. The FBI normally interview for information regarding a criminal complaint versus a security clearance interview. I had a clearance for over 30 years and at no time was the FBI involved. My information was taken by and followed up by government agents who collected information for the security clearance. The past amount spent per clearance was $10,000 which pays for the agents time. My clearance for over 30 years was a "Q." I had a secret in the navy, and was given a top secret when hired.
Raven
(13,877 posts)definitely conducted by an FBI Agent...I will never forget that calling card stuck in my front door.
PatrickforO
(14,558 posts)Not good.
But kudos to you for good character. I would never, ever lie about my ex either. She was fine - we just grew apart. But then, divorces can be crazy times.
Kali
(55,002 posts)and just writing that last part makes me
Hekate
(90,538 posts)You know, how do we feel about men whose wives have accused them losing their jobs? They are innocent until proven guilty in court, right?
He's having a hard time acknowledging (a) the nature of interviews with the FBI, the nature of security clearances, and (c) at-will employment.
tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)I appreciate the insight.