IF we can secure our airports, we can secure our schools

BTW, the TSA really isn't very good; they've just been lucky. They let guns on airplanes all the time and have an 80% failure rate: http://abcnews.go.com/US/tsa-fails-tests-latest-undercover-operation-us-airports/story?id=51022188 So do you really want to rely on them? And even if they were more effective, who wants to attend school in a place where you have to go through a metal detector and have your bags checked and get patted down, and there are armed cops or soldiers everywhere? And the mass shootings aren't limited to schools - so do we have to turn movie theatres, shopping centers, churches and music festivals into fortresses, too?

Nope. The problem is too damn many guns. Get rid of the AR-15s and weapons like them.

But Schools today have resource officers which are basically just cops on loan.

I'm not exactly in love with the idea. I just don't see anything changing on the gun front in our generation.

Also, fuck this idea.

great idea.

armed police officers, and many airplanes have armed federal air marshals and/or armed pilots on board. TSA is not responsible for anything but keeping passengers from bringing guns and other prohibited items into the secure area of the airport. They don't even protect the actual airplanes.

Most schools already have armed police officers (called resource officers in many districts)

This isn't about policing the kids. It's about keeping guns out of schools.

What about shopping malls, churches, movie theatres, music festivals, night clubs and other public spaces where shootings have occurred? Are we going to have TSA-type personnel screening everybody who goes anywhere?

It's easy to let perfection be the enemy of good.

So far, our answer has been candle light vigils and tough talk on internet chat boards.

I don't think that solution is working.

"It's easy to let perfection be the enemy of good...."

It's also easy to use that as an excuse to avoid the inconvenient, rather than addressing the specific concerns raised.

Having armed guards at every school entrance and all around school grounds perimeter seems not good. Next up would be shooting school buses. Or some other school event.

can happen in the check in areas.

to keep them from bringing prohibited items into the secure area of the airport. The airplanes themselves, once they have left the gate, are (possibly) protected by armed FAMs or pilots.

The screening areas themselves would be deathtraps. Would a suicide bomber meekly surrender? I think not.

Hmm.

or highjacking since TSA took over.

If you know of one, feel free to educate me.

They had an 80% failure rate at a recent inspection. http://abcnews.go.com/US/tsa-fails-tests-latest-undercover-operation-us-airports/story?id=51022188

And is outside of TSA control.

In fact baggage claim is totally open and it's legal to have guns there.

Are we securing the parking lots as well?

We have manned, armed personnel at every entry point of every school for the entire school day plus any after school activities, sporting events and the like?

Just from my memory, these horrible events seem to occur in the classrooms, hallways and cafeterias.

So we should focus on that.

The TSA screening is to prevent or deter weapons from being taken onboard the aircraft. As demonstrated in Brussels, the security line itself provides a shooting target.

Mass shootings at airports was not, and is not, the problem that passenger screening was intended to solve.

Frankly I love our kids more than I hate TSA.

However I'm pretty sure that I know exactly what changes and improvements that will come from this latest shooting.

Absolutely nothing.

Why? Because everyone is too entrenched in their own ideas and biased. That goes for the right as well as the left.

Don't listen to the right-wing anti-TSA people.

They (TSA) do a good job.

Starting - when, first grade?

We're living in such mixed up times.

I haven't seen that in an age. Thanks for that!

I'm pretty sure that nothing will change.

And in a short amount of time, we'll have these conversations all over again.

We are all way to convinced how smart we are, to listen to any suggestions at all.

The amount of security to make an entire school into something like the "secure area" of an airport would take a ton of manpower and a god-awful shit-ton of money. (There's way way way more schools than there are airports.)

That's as common as can be. Lots of people act tough when it's anonymous.

But I do believe that I'm right on this last point. Absolutely nothing will change and children will die and die and die. And then we all repeat our same Internet arguments.

What's stopping us?

I like the idea of an attack app for your kid's phones. Press it, the phone is logged, the alarms go off, police are called. Each school has a unique code. If a kid presses it maliciously, they get a STERN talking to by the principal and their parents get tagged with a bill. The alarm goes off, the kids head to the nearest classroom. Put locks on doors. Keep cops within a one mile radius of schools when in session.

It will not stop the shooters, but it will guarantee a more rapid police presence, and it will reduce the number of potential targets.

I also think that it may make sense to have sensor activated doors, both external and internal. Doors will automatically lock if you don't have a button or badge. It won't stop angry students, but the overwhelming majority of school shootings were not done by students (including the most recent). The badges can be reprogrammed, which means that if a student is expelled, they can't use their badge to get back in.

I don't like the fact that we have reached the stage where any of this is necessary, but I think these are relatively inexpensive solutions that can increase security without having to go the whole metal detector route (which I've long felt was ineffective).

Everything else in our society must contort itself in order to accommodate the sacred right to hump guns.

The lives of children pale in importance when compared to the right to hump guns.

I have always been for gun control. Now it is time to act. My youngest is in college and I always worry about that...worried about it when they were in public school... enough.

School budgets are so tight that teachers have to pay for things like pencils out of their pocket. Parents are being asked to supply basic sanitation items such as tissues, cleaning wipes, and toilet paper.

If there's no room for TP in the budget, tell me where there's room for security.

Taxpayer money.

Our national budget is $3.9 trillion. There are plenty of smart people who can work with that budget.

Los Angeles does. NYC does. See this:



https://www.wnyc.org/story/school-metal-detectors/

I ask because I have no idea.

For some reason, it seems that people are ok with inner city schools doing this, but the suggestion that more schools try this (i.e. wealthier schools), provokes strong reactions as you can see in this thread.

Some people even say the idea is ridiculous. I guess they didn't see your links (for that matter I didn't either)

have metal detectors at entry points. I don't even know if anyone has done the research.

from gun humpers who shouldn't have them...I don't want to live in an America that you describe and by God I have rights too...and the filthy purveyors of death ...the NRA can go to hell.

. . . . how to read Dick and Jane.

What the fuck are we becoming????

Than a rain of bullets.

But everyone seems ok if LA and NYC inner city school kids walk through metal detectors. Why the sudden concern when its middle class kids?

Just wondering.

How DARE you?

You want a solution? I got a solution:

MELT THE FUCKING GUNS.

But yes. Lets melt them.

What the next step?

I KNOW what you are.

If you just want to argue, I'm not good internet sparing partner.

Schools aren't the only places and students aren't the only Americans who deserve to be safe.

It's the guns, not the security.

Tax the fuck out of the guns and bullets, but spend it on mental health services and prison reform. We do not need a bigger police state!

And it won't go further at least due to my efforts.

It was worth posting however, if only for the fact that I did learn something - This sort of security is actually happening already in NYC and LA (see post above).

It's not something that I've heard about before and certainly I've not heard people getting angry about it, nor have I heard if it was successful. But it does seem to be accepted in certain areas.

The point of the TSA screening is to attempt to stop people from getting weapons onto airplanes and to deter them from trying to take out or take over an airplane.

Someone seeking to shoot up a bunch of others will do so at the security line, as was done at the Brussels airport, and as would certainly be a good target for a school shooter.

This should work great.