General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis is a must read

Two things happened over the weekend that complicate our understanding of President Trumps awareness of Russian interference in the 2016 election.
The first is that Trump was interviewed by Fox Newss Jeanine Pirro. She raised the question of collusion that is, whether elements of the Trump campaign assisted the Russian effort to influence the results of the 2016 election.
After 18 months, not any kind of reference to any collusion, Pirro said.
To which Trump replied:
That is true, Jeanine. You have all these committees, everybodys looking. There is no collusion. No phone calls I had no phone calls, no meetings, no nothing. There is no collusion. I say it all the time. Anybody that asks. There is no collusion.
For some time, its been unclear exactly what Trump means when he says there was no collusion (as he often does). In January, the New York Timess Maggie Haberman asked press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders what exactly was meant when Trump used the term.
...
Were asked to believe, too, that even if Trump had been informed about any or all of the Russian outreach efforts, that this doesnt constitute collusion on the part of the president with the Russian interference effort. (Though earlier this year, his press secretary articulated that it would.)
There are two groups of people who know how valid Trumps argument is. The first is Trump and his close family. The other, it seems fair to assume, is special counsel Robert S. Mueller III and his team.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2018/02/26/what-did-trump-know-and-when-did-he-know-it/?utm_term=.71a443756f3a
Botany
(77,316 posts)The next day, Papadopoulos emailed senior campaign adviser Stephen Miller and told him that he had some interesting messages coming in from Moscow about a trip when the time is right.
Is that where it ended? Did Papadopoulos tell the campaign specifically about the stolen email messages? The next month, he told it to Australian High Commissioner to Great Britain Alexander Downer over drinks in London. Once the DNC leaks began, Australia tipped off the FBI about the conversation with Papadopoulos, and the investigation began. Is it likely that Papadopoulos told a foreign diplomat about what he had learned but never told anyone else in the campaign? That never got back to Trump? Despite Trump saying that he believed the Russians to be in possession of Clinton emails which the DNC leaks that were public on July 27 were not?
snip
In July, campaign adviser Carter Page the subject of the FBI surveillance warrant at the heart of the Nunes memo traveled to Moscow with the campaigns blessing. Two weeks later, Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence officer conducting research for Fusion GPS (on the dime of the DNC and Clintons campaign) was told that Page, too, had been informed of the existence of compromising material on Clinton. (The DNC leaks began three days later.)
Page denied meeting Kremlin official Igor Diveykin and told the House Intelligence Committee during testimony that he had only briefly greeted Deputy Prime Minister Arkady Dvorkovich during his trip.
After his return to the United States, though, Page sent the campaign a memo to say that he had spoken with Dvorkovich in a private conversation in which the deputy prime minister expressed strong support for Mr. Trump. He also sent an email to two campaign staffers saying that he would send you guys a readout soon regarding some incredible insights and outreach Ive received from a few Russian legislators and senior members of the Putin administration.
DemocratSinceBirth
(101,847 posts)volstork
(5,836 posts)the bombing starts.