General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIm curious. Does anyone have a problem with
with Billy Graham laying in state? My problem is this; we are NOT a theocracy. I find it all odd, thats all.
Frustratedlady
(16,254 posts)Zoonart
(11,832 posts)Lying in honor refers to a private citizen and has been rare historically. Officer Jacob J. Chestnut Jr. and detective John M. Gibson, who were killed by a gunman at the Capitol in 1998, became the first private citizens to lie in honor. In 2005, Parks became the first woman and second black American to be honored in this way at the Capitol Rotunda, according to the House, following a resolution from both houses of Congress.
Yes, I have a problem with this honor being extended to Billy Graham.
Frustratedlady
(16,254 posts)No, I don't think Billy Graham reached the point where he would be honored with lying in state in the Capitol.
Will Pat Robertson be next?
MFM008
(19,803 posts)Is out.
LisaM
(27,794 posts)He was a religious figure, too, and (I don't know whether he did) I would have zero problem with his lying in state at the Capitol Building.
I'm not a Billy Graham fan, but to some extent, he tried to work across the aisle, and had relationships with both Presidents Carter and Clinton, along with Republicans. I would never, ever go to his lying in, but it doesn't really bother me.
50 Shades Of Blue
(9,920 posts)for all. No comparison. It bothered the fuck out of me that Carter and Clinton gave Graham the time of day.
LisaM
(27,794 posts)Jimmy Carter made a very big deal of being religious, Clinton less so, but it was in his background.
BTW, I looked it up, and no, MLK, Jr. did not lie in state at the Capitol Building - very few civilians have.
The original question, though, was not about what the person was working for or against, it was the concept of a religious figure lying in state when we have separation of church and state - it wasn't about the policies of said person. I think it's odd, but it just doesn't bother me all that much. I had actually thought about this comparison before, and since I'd concluded to myself that if it had been MLK, I'd have been all for it, it doesn't matter all that much to me if Billy Graham does.
50 Shades Of Blue
(9,920 posts)LisaM
(27,794 posts)I was just trying to answer the question of whether it bothered me that a religious figure was the person in question. Since there are religious figures whom I'd support lying in state, then I just gave an honest answer. I don't care for Billy Graham either, but that was not the question posed.
Va Lefty
(6,252 posts)He was hardly the paragon of morality he is portrayed as.
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-soul-crushing-legacy-of-billy-graham-w517067
LisaM
(27,794 posts)I give up.
Va Lefty
(6,252 posts)I apologize.
LisaM
(27,794 posts)Thank you.
nocalflea
(1,387 posts)My response was similar to yours. #13 here:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100210274100
I can and do understand the distinction you're making.
Solomon
(12,310 posts)Civil rights for all. Wouldn't have mattered what his profession was. He achieved great things deserving of honor outside of his profession. In Graham's case it seems he's being honored for BEING a religious figure.
Retrograde
(10,129 posts)so one could make an argument for him being honored for his overall contributions to humanity. Graham, not so much - at least I don't recall any instances of him putting his life or freedom on the line for his beliefs.
Aristus
(66,286 posts)with it.
In the rotunda of the US Capitol? Yeah, I think it's a bad idea.
a kennedy
(29,615 posts)Separation of church & state! Billy Graham does not belong in the Capitol Rotunda. St. Patricks Cathedral would have been more appropriate, and Grahams wasnt Catholic.
MineralMan
(146,254 posts)He never held public office, much less in the federal government. He was a Christian preacher. That's all.
He should not be lying in state in the Capitol Rotunda. Period.
blake2012
(1,294 posts)And his son is a horrible reminder of where vocal religious leaders have gonestraight to fascist, right wing language and behavior.
GWC58
(2,678 posts)their lack of being Christ like. When did Christ say screw the poor, the more unfortunate. Phonies is what they are, especially the likes of the person laying in honor. For Graham its now was.
GWC58
(2,678 posts)excuse for a, supposed, man of God. Hell hes not even a good snake oil salesman. Maybe hes just a snake. A snake that crawls on his belly!
mulsh
(2,959 posts)Are they tithing or charging an admission to view the casket?
YessirAtsaFact
(2,064 posts)Insert a $20 bill and the casket opens for 10 seconds. Fifty bucks gets you a 30 second peek.
50 Shades Of Blue
(9,920 posts)NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)they promise us down here if we make ourselves subservient to their imaginary sky gods. He's just as dead as he was a thousand years ago and as gone as my dog that I put in the yard two years ago.
They just look stupid fawning over the shell of a snake oil salesman.
If you are religious and I've offended you, forgive me.
GeorgeGist
(25,311 posts)Cheers!
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Lying in Honor rather than in State.
Lying in Honor is one step below, and a more recent phenomenon. Graham is the fourth person to lie in honor in the Capitol. The three others were U.S. Capitol Police Officers Jacob Chestnut and John Gibson and Rosa Parks.
I'd like to have seen Martin L King Laid in Honor had it been available at the time... despite his being (by today's lazy definitions) a religious fundamentalist.
bottomofthehill
(8,318 posts)1 Rosa Parks, Civil Rights Icon who helped start a movement to equality
2/3, US Capitol Police Officers who were killed by a deranged gunman. JJ Chestnut and John Gibson died in the US Capitol defending the building, its employees and the general public who were all in the building at the time of the shooting.
4 Billy Graham.
WillowTree
(5,325 posts)I have way bigger things to be concerned about.
CousinIT
(9,218 posts)50 Shades Of Blue
(9,920 posts)nocalflea
(1,387 posts)Politicians have been pandering to Billy Graham since I can remember. I've never understood his appeal, but then I've never run for office.
Gidney N Cloyd
(19,819 posts)bottomofthehill
(8,318 posts)The Continuing Resolution is only good through March 23 and then the Govt is once again broke and in the "Closing Down" mode. House votes were canceled this week and most Members of Congress have now gone home for the week so we are less than 3 weeks away from the next Shut Down.
wryter2000
(46,023 posts)And I'm very active in a Christian church.
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)"America's Pastor". This country has no official religion as stated in our constitution so, no Billy Graham is not our pastor. Don't get me started on his anti-semitic (he was caught on tape) and anti-gay statements. BG was a proponent of conversion therapy and thought AIDS was God's judgement on gays.
Retrograde
(10,129 posts)For someone who did little more than talk? Oh, and worm his way into the corridors of power. There's a nice article in Rolling Stone about Graham's history with presidents and presidential candidates - you can add Catholics to his anti list it seems, along with all other non-Protestant believers. IMHO, Graham's greatest achievements were building up what looked like a big enough following that most politicians were afraid to offend him, and paving the way for today's crop of televangelists. Neither of those are things I chose to honor.
moriah
(8,311 posts)Dude. He's dead. Here's his cold body. That's what people are reporting about. You have given the dictionary example for "fake news", in fact -- news you don't like and spin to fit your worldview but is in fact true.
Sorry, he was my governor for awhile and I'm still embarrassed.
samnsara
(17,604 posts)FSogol
(45,446 posts)NRaleighLiberal
(60,006 posts)MFM008
(19,803 posts)For Red Don.
Daily Mail was pushing a picture of him and Melania holding hands which is funny because now she knows where that hand has been......
Hey Mel... $$$130. Thousand.....
Duppers
(28,117 posts)Hubs and I were discussing this yesterday. We are atheists, (20% of this nation has no religious affiliation whatsoever) and are in total agreement with you.
The majority of the country are not evangelical protestants and this nation is not a theocracy.
The WaPo hits it on the head in this sentence:
Everything they do is a political ploy.