General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLBJ and impeachment
There's an anecdotal story (may or may not be true, but nevertheless) that during a campaign in Texas Johnson told his campaign manager to accuse his opponent of being "queer".
"Lyndon, you KNOW he ain't queer."
"Hell, yeah. I KNOW that. I just want the sunovabitch to have to deny it!"
IF, and it's a very big IF, we took back the House and could bring articles of impeachment the senate would never convict.
But every repug there would have to go on record as voting not to convict the the most corrupt president we have ever had.
And the next time around...?
Elections have consequences.
unblock
(52,126 posts)He might not have said any of it, but the thing he might not have said was a pig fucker, not queer
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)third base is, Trof. But unlike faking a baseball throw, fake impeachment proceedings as a political maneuver are extremely unprincipled and the people don't like it. The voters punished the Republicans severely in the midterms after they did it.
That sounds like something he would say and a ruthless political ploy he would employ. This is what it was about for him, though:
Christ, we can't get a way calling him a pig-fucker, the campaign manager protested. Nobody's going to believe a thing like that. I know, Johnson replied. But let's make the sonofabitch deny it. I read that excerpt from Hunter S. Thompson's Fear & Loathing: On The Campaign Trail '72
marble falls
(57,014 posts)all the way into November and take it all.
Our D House majority could spend their time holding hearings and investigations into the Dotard corruption, and passing legislation to, I don't know, help people.