General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMan left (wounded) fiance & kids at Aurora theater and drove away. Web is beating him up.
story was on radio this morning. Not judging. Just wondering what people think. Internet is calling him a coward. He foolishly told what he did.Dad Leaves Baby on Floor During Aurora Theater Shooting and Drives Away
In the panic and chaos of the Aurora, Colorado theater shooting, a man earned instant infamy as he left his wounded fiancée and children in the theater and drove off without them.
It all started when father Jamie Rohrs says they arrived a little late and originally planned to sit where James Eagan Holmes entered. Instead, they opted for a second floor balcony. When the shooting started, Rohrs said he was holding his infant, Ethan, and started running and dodging other panicked theater goers. He originally thought about playing dead by lying on the ground with his baby, but little Ethan was crying and Rohrs told ABC News, "He's crying and they're going to come get me."
Rohrs believed that there was more than one shooter at first, which is quite understandable. Holmes used .233 semiautomatic rifle, two 40 caliber Glocks, and a Remington 870 shotgun in the mass attack. All four guns were purchased legally at Bass Pro Shop Gander Mountain, both national chain sporting goods stores.
Rohrs said he became disoriented after putting his baby down and after running around the theater, couldn't find his child again. Instead of going back and looking for him, the man continued to run outside. He didn't stop there, though. In his highly panicked stated, he hopped in his car and drove off.
Meanwhile, his fiancée Patricia Legarreta had a shrapnel injury from her thigh to her ankle. She was lying on the floor when she saw her baby. She picked him up, grabbed her daughter, Azeria's hand, and ran as fast as she could out of the theater. 4-year-old Azeria had been asleep when the shooting started.
Rohrs apparently felt remorse and a bit of self-loathing when he realized he was alone in the car and Legarreta called him from someone else's phone to find out where he was. He turned back, reuniting with his family before all were taken to the hospital and later released.
http://news.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474981486647
LisaL
(47,423 posts)and her two children out of the theater.
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)
Jarell Brooks, 19, is lucky to be alive. He was in theater 9 on July 20, 2012 when James Holmes opened fire during the premier of Dark Night Rises. When Holmes started shooting, everyone scrambled to the exits, including Brooks, Patricia Legarreta and Jamie Rohrs.
Legarreta was in the theater with Rohrs, her now fiance, her four year old and four month old. When the shooting started Rohrs, left the theater, leaving Legarreta to fend for herself and two children. As Brooks was trying get out of the theater he saw her struggling to get out with both children.
In an interview with ABC News Brooks said, "At the end of the aisle, I ran into a woman. She yelled, 'My kids!' and I saw she had two young kids with her. I made sure they got in the aisle and pushed behind her to make sure she got out of there."
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)...but I wouldn't have been able to leave without my loved ones. Just not wired that way...
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)That is apparently who he is, at the core. If the account is true.
He may not have been able to help his reaction. He is who he is. But who he is, is a coward, IMO.
Occulus
(20,599 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)If anyone, even myself, reacts that way to danger....that is what "coward" means. To run for the hills to save yourself, and put an innocent, vulnerable baby on the floor to die, and leave your gf and her child there to die...that is what it means to be a coward.
TalkingDog
(9,001 posts)How did you react?
Because I've arrived late to a stadium after it collapsed, people lying everywhere, bleeding and broken. EMS running around like crazy trying to do triage. I jumped right in and started grabbing the mildly wounded who were walking around and telling them to sit down and stay until somebody could look at them.
After about 10 minutes I realized I had arrived at an emergency drill. All the wounded and screaming were there for extra credit in class.
Realizing there were no wounded or dying, I went off by my self and got hysterical.
Another time my mother, who was in the midst of dying of cancer had had a stroke, I dutifully got her dressed and took her to her doctor instead of calling an ambulance because I was on my way into town to go to yoga anyway.
The Doctor told me they were going to admit her to the hospital and run some tests. I got up to leave to go to yoga. It was like I was on automatic pilot. I later realized I was in shock and had dissociated. Luckily before I left the Doctor explained that I was going to have to take her to the emergency room to have her admitted, so I didn't end up leaving her there alone. But otherwise I probably would have. Not because I didn't care, but because at that point it's like my brain had it's own agenda which was: if you keep things as normal as possible, then there is nothing really wrong.
Now, if you had only seen me in one or the other of those situations with no other context, you would decide I was either a selfless hero or a stone-cold heartless bitch.
I'll give the guy a break. He was panicked. Until you've been exactly in his shoes, you really don't have a right to judge him.
kurtzapril4
(1,353 posts)I've had the dis-association thing happen to me, too. It's almost like you go outside yourself.
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)needed saying.
Adrenaline surges cause 'fight or flight' response and weird shit can happen that has nothing to do with the individual's underlying character or lack thereof.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)It will be interesting to see.
I have been in a few emergencies, I credit TRAINING, not heroics, reacting "properly" in each of them.
A few even involved fire arms...
But until you are there, you really do NOT KNOW how you will react, and I will never call somebody a coward.
Now just in case you are, and you react in an "inappropriate fashion" can I call you a coward?
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)malaise
(296,106 posts)after he ran and left her and their kids and she said yes.
marlakay
(13,282 posts)Of their relationship...she was over emotional. I bet he one one of those that wouldn't get married even though they had a kid and after what he did, he proposed out of guilt....
Codeine
(25,586 posts)What a wuss.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)The "wuss," a derivative of "pussy" and "woman," was his fiancee who stayed with their children and covered them.
What he was... is... is a COWARD.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)arely staircase
(12,482 posts)at least according to my recolection of fast times at ridgmont high.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)whathehell
(30,468 posts)it's ironic, not to mention offensive, that "pussy" still equates with "coward"
especially in light of the many instances of female heroism under fire.
If we must stick with sexual expressions, maybe "limp dick" would be
more appropriate.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)Arctic Dave
(13,812 posts)He will have to live with it.
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)Marr
(20,317 posts)Turns out he did. I mean, if the word doesn't apply here, it has no meaning at all.
Arctic Dave
(13,812 posts)Missycim
(950 posts)How can you leave an infant and your pregnant GF there to die? It doesnt matter if you crap your pants but protect them...
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)It wasn't calculated. A person doesn't know how they will react in such a situation, until they're in one. We all hope we'd be heroic, but can we be sure? Since he later felt remorse and returned, I don't think he should be flogged over it, especially by strangers.
LisaL
(47,423 posts)JI7
(93,616 posts)it's one thing to escape from danger, but the rest of it is where he comes off so badly .
ellenfl
(8,660 posts)he sure was quick to get on tv. theirs was the first interview i saw the next morning and he NEVER said he ran out. major character flaw.
ellen fl
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Its between the two of them, theres really no need for strangers to push their way into the picture.
Keep in mind, self-preservation is a basic human instinct... cowardice/flight is the normal. It takes a great deal of training and/or self control to overcome. Some people rise to the occasion, some don't. Yes, he should have stayed but ran. But IMO the real story is the 19yo who was fleeing, and stopped to help.
ellenfl
(8,660 posts)and none of it is good.
ellen fl
left is right
(1,665 posts)That does not in anyway excuse abandoning a 4-year old
LisaL
(47,423 posts)I think it would be much more understandable. But the infant was left behind when he run from the theater.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)that he dumped his own baby to save his own skin. If he'd kept his baby and run, I could understand it. But he dumped the crying baby.
Not good spouse or parent material, imo.
Mike_Valentine
(35 posts)... but only one of the options available.
Don't even see how this guy looks at himself in the mirror...
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Not everybody lives up to the heroic ideals of internet posters. In war, its sometimes found a soldier who has fired no rounds, they huddled down in their fox hole the entire battle. The Army tries to weed those out in training, but until real bullets start flying you just don't know.
LisaL
(47,423 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)CanonRay
(16,171 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Mike_Valentine
(35 posts)My problem arose when you stated that it was the norm.
Dunno about percentages but there is definitely a split in fight/flight. Dude doesn't even have to fight and tackle the guy but protection of women and children is pretty high on my personal priority list and thus I judge him.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)But still, self-preservation is a base animal instinct that kicks in when the brain is overwhelmed and shuts down. This is why the military does such extensive training... to weed out those with a low threshhold, and to prepare the remainder to keep their wits and do their duty when the shit hits the fan.
If the guy has any character, he'll do a lot of self-reflection, and do a better job next crisis. If not, he'll sit behind a keyboard in anonimity and judge others to a higher standard than he displayed.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)an interesting point. self preservation is a deep biological instinct. but then so is protecting one's offspring
.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)More of a learned response for fathers. 9 months of gestation gives mothers a strong bond with the child. Its the husband/wife relationship that causes the the bond to develop and grow in the father.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)in all humans (and all living things) is to pass along your DNA. Seems like it would be a.natural instinct to protect the baby as it was a package of the dad's DNA. But I guess fleeing could be seen as living to procreate another day.
fried eggs
(910 posts)throw themselves in the line of fire to protect their kids. That guy is a loser. Point blank period!
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)People who are panicking aren't thinking clearly or logically.
Do you know why lifeguards have the little float? They are expert swimmers. But they use the float to extend to the drowinng person so they can stay out of arms reach. A drowning person is in a state of panic and will attempt to climb on anything in reach. If they climb on the lifeguard, they push them under and drown their rescuer.
The guy probably was never tested in his life. His first big test, he blew it. The memory will be with him forever... isn't that punishment enough?
LisaL
(47,423 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)and some posters in this thread have been harsh. All Im saying is the guy probably has never been in a similar situation before. When all of a sudden, hes facing the biggest test of his life, for which he wasn't prepared, and failed. Theres no need for us to pile on.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)He may not have been able to help his reaction. It was a gut reaction. Self-preservation. At the cost of a baby and fiancee he supposedly loves. That's who he is, like it or not. When push comes to shove, his reaction is to save himself, above all other things. He was a coward.
If the fiancee marries him, at least she knows what she'll be getting. If there's a house fire, or financial trouble, or anything urgent where his survival instincts kick in, at least she knows what his reaction will be.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,160 posts)The lady in question now has full disclosure about his ability to handle emergencies.
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)to be told what happened, will have the same "understanding." "Gee, thanks, dad!" Panic is one thing, ABANDONING YOUR CHILD when some lunatic is firing live rounds is a whole new level of cowardice.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)The protagonist ratted out his lover when he was thrown in a cage of rats, because of uncontrollable fear.
Yes, the guy didn't measure up when confronted with a horrible tragedy unfolding around him... a tragedy for which he was unprepared and never occured to him he might face. I have faced emergencies of a lesser nature and kept my wits about me. I think I would also in a situtuation like the shooting, but Im not going to sit behind a keyboard and call him a coward. Hes got to live with his actions for the rest of his life, no need for us to pile on.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)when the moment calls for it. I am sure he is suffering some shame and guilt, if he's at all normal.
JI7
(93,616 posts)LisaL
(47,423 posts)Whisp
(24,096 posts)but pretty damn sure not that
sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)JI7
(93,616 posts)REP
(21,691 posts)It seems like cowardice, but I can also see in the panic, fear and chaos how easy it would be to just lose track of one's train of thoughts. I've never been in a terrifying situation like that, but I've been under prolonged extreme stress and have done unbelievably stupid (and dangerous) things, like leave an oven on for days or my keys in the lock outside the door overnight without realizing it - things (and risks) I'd never, ever normally do.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)to do my grocery shopping, but left the keys in the ignition, car running, doors not locked. I basically forgot to shut off the car. I am lucky to have put it in park, really.
REP
(21,691 posts)I just don't do things like leave the keys in the ignition of my unlocked car or the keys in the front door lock over night of any other of the bizarre things I was doing; that's not normal for me, and having no memory of having done them or the events around them was as bad the thing itself.
So while I very much hope I wouldn't leave a loved one in a situation like that, I have an inkling how it may have happened.
Of course, it's possible he's a douche, but maybe not.
ellenfl
(8,660 posts)pnwmom
(110,261 posts)I could see him panicking and running out with that baby and forgetting the rest of the family. But how could he abandon the baby in his arms?
LisaL
(47,423 posts)People expect a person to protect their own child.
REP
(21,691 posts)I know what I hope I'd do. May I never have to test it.
JI7
(93,616 posts)but i wish they would focus more on the 19 year old who helped the mother and kids rather than this idiot. of course it doens't help that this guy seems like a media whore and the other guy doesn't see himself as a hero .
Dash87
(3,220 posts)Guy who ran away - 'I'm such a hero. Blah blah blah. Look at me on the news.' (Then it comes out what he actually did)
Guy who ran and protected kids that weren't even his - 'Leave me alone. I'm not a hero. Anyone would have done what I did.'
It reminds me of that movie where, I think there was a plane crash, and the character who acted like a coward took credit for saving a bunch of people on the plane, while the real hero just stayed out of the limelight and never wanted to correct the story. I forget what it's called.
redqueen
(115,186 posts)The best lack all conviction, while the worst are full of passionate intensity. - Yeats
ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...to that kind of a situation. We all hope we'd be heroes, and we hope we would not act in a way that appears cowardly. But we can't know how we would really react until the situation arises.
It can be just a purely physiological reaction. Who knows, maybe a bullet whizzed by so close that it just triggered a flight reaction that he was not even consciously aware of.
In any case, he was a victim, not a perpetrator. I wish people would not pile on like they appear to be doing. I'm sure he already has enough survivor's guilt. Or maybe not -- who knows. But he does not appear to be a bad guy. So maybe he's a coward. For most of us, our acts that we may not be proud of are known only to us or just a few other people. For him, now everyone knows what he did and it appears everyone feels free to weigh in.
Geez, just leave him alone.
JI7
(93,616 posts)for him to come pick them up.
ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...that's for sure. As I said in another reply, yes he acted badly but to me it's forgiveable given the sudden and traumatic nature of the incident.
kurtzapril4
(1,353 posts)ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...and it's one reason I don't think we can judge him based on this one incident.
marlakay
(13,282 posts)They caught the guy right away...he could have just hidden until she came out...his instinct was to help himself...and I think she said yes to proposal because he was fighting getting married until this happened and did it out of guilt...
She will regret and leave him within a year or two...
pnwmom
(110,261 posts)to no one's care at all. That to me is unimaginable.
LisaL
(47,423 posts)ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...and by doing so he leaves himself open to people's opinions. I did not mean to imply people don't have the right to state their opinion of his actions. My opinion is that the situation was so extreme and so sudden and scary, that a person can be forgiven for reacting badly. I do agree that he reacted badly.
laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)As a parent, your #1 instinct is to protect your child, not to toss them aside. When a parent accidentally leaves their kid in a hot car to die, DU is all over them for being horrible parents, but when a parent throws their child aside in a hail of bullets, we need to leave him alone? wtf?
ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...and yes one would hope that a parent would instinctively protect their child in such a situation. But we don't really know what we would do until it happens. One reason we admire heroes, is they are atypical. Most of us aren't heroes. Most of us think we aren't cowards, either, but we are rarely put to the test in a situation like this.
Anyway: I'm not telling anyone else what to do or what to say, just chiming in. My feelings about him when I saw an interview was, wow, he came right out and admitted he behaved like a coward. It was surprising. Most people would never admit that on camera. So he's a coward, but he's an honest one. Other than that, I don't want to judge him, that's all. I'm glad they all got out of it okay.
LisaL
(47,423 posts)NYC Liberal
(20,453 posts)I would never be able to forgive myself. And quite honestly I would deserve whatever harsh things people would have to say about me.
ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...in the interview I saw, which may be one reason people are reacting so negatively to him.
pnwmom
(110,261 posts)while he ran out the door.
He was anti-heroic when he put the baby down and just left him.
ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...look, I'm not defending the guy, just saying that it was an extreme circumstance and happened in an instant. He was tested and found wanting, but it doesn't make me hate the guy. That's all I'm saying.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)When in danger, his reaction is to save himself, above all else, above all others, whether they be babies, a woman he loves, the more vulnerable, etc. That is the definition of cowardice.
ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...I just don't see any reason to hate him for it. This was a sudden and extreme occurrence and once he had fled, there wasn't much else useful he could do. So while I don't admire him for it, neither do I feel any need to condemn him. Obviously others feel differently, and have every right to say so.
datasuspect
(26,591 posts)bravery in combat is a traditionally masculine trait.
although there have been ancient tribes of warrior women, the project of war has traditionally been the stomping ground of men.
when you denigrate manhood and masculine traits, you get a generation of eunuchs who can't be relied upon to wipe their own ass let alone shoot down Nazis over Dresden.
datasuspect
(26,591 posts)i know everything that is going on wherever i might be.
i can detect changes in barometric pressure, wind speed, and other environmental factors innately.
where they fucked up? don't go in large crowds of people.
stay away from people, treat everyone as a potential threat, and maintain hypervigilance.
newspeak
(4,847 posts)It sounds like to me "every man for himself." Also, altruism, bravery can be found in both men and women. Putting ones' life on the line has no gender. As can be seen in some stories about WWII and people, like the celts, where both men and women fought side by side.
datasuspect
(26,591 posts)i just made the claim, GENERALLY SPEAKING, that war is traditionally a male pursuit.
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)aikoaiko
(34,214 posts)Sure, no one really knows how they will react until they are in the situation, but as a father he shirked a basic duty to the child out of fear.
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)Some men will put their lives on the line for stranger, which did happen there, and others will abandon their own families to save themselves.
Until a person has been in a life or death situation, you simply don't know what you, or others, will do.
LisaL
(47,423 posts)Gin
(7,212 posts)If so.....I saw them do interviews but never heard th e story about him leaving...."if it's the same guy I am thinking of.
JI7
(93,616 posts)Gin
(7,212 posts)Now it may have been from shame........
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)LisaL
(47,423 posts)Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)reformist2
(9,841 posts)because there needs to be social pressure *not* to do what this guy did.
Zalatix
(8,994 posts)The Internet never forgets. This guy will be meta-sentenced for life over this. There's no such thing now as paying your debt to society, making restitution and moving on.
You don't even move on from being caught on youtube picking your nose.
https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ie=UTF-8#hl=en&output=search&sclient=psy-ab&q=picking%20nose%20caught%20youtube&oq=&gs_l=&pbx=1&fp=f4f54da109365c4e&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&biw=957&bih=704
You get caught doing the slightest wrong thing and the Intarweb goes on a crusade to find your identity and people start bombarding you with nasty phone calls.
klook
(13,600 posts)and you can pick your nose, but only the pResident can pick his nose.
Mike_Valentine
(35 posts)Honestly there often isn't enough social pressure (a.k.a. shame) to induce behavioral change nowadays.
Robb
(39,665 posts)There are only people who react differently, whether from training or their own original wiring.
It takes a lot of work to convince people it's the right idea to run towards gunfire. Running away from it is actually a pretty normal, even rational response, at a basic level.
LisaL
(47,423 posts)I noticed the girlfriend managed to save both kids with the help of a stranger.
Robb
(39,665 posts)The mother deserves more praise than she's getting, I'd say.
LisaL
(47,423 posts)his or her child. That behavior is viewed as normal.
Robb
(39,665 posts)caseymoz
(5,763 posts). . . I can see this happening in a panic. I can see getting disorganized forgetting where you put the baby, and then having a mental collapse due to fear and confusion, and impulsively leaving the theater. Now medicated, I can't see myself having a reaction that bad, but I can always disappoint myself. Maybe he had something else going on.
Even if she accepted his proposal, though, I think their relationship is through. It just hasn't sunk in with her, yet. Whether she forgives or not, it's too big of a black mark to forget.
I don't judge him, though. You can't expect an untrained person to do the right thing in an emergency, and so many things can go wrong with judgment in a situation that bad. Some people will look far better than others, but run the scenario again, and someone else would flake out as bad, perhaps even one of the heroes.
If he were trained for battle or a professional rescuer, yes, I'd call him a coward. As it is, he was just in the wrong place at the wrong time with a responsibility he wasn't ready for.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Whether he thought it out, or whether it was gut reaction, it's the same thing. He is a coward.
Occulus
(20,599 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Facts are pesky things. They don't go away because you disagree with them. His actions were cowardly, by definition.
caseymoz
(5,763 posts)It expresses your reaction to him. If all I knew about him were the theater, a gunman, and the word "coward," I couldn't come up with a picture of what he did, except it had something to do with running away. So, don't say there's anything factual about it.
I hope you never have a vulnerable moment in your life. Somehow, I think if you did, you'd find softer words to describe "the facts."
We don't know if his thought process were "I'm going to leave this baby here to die" or, "what? where? a gunshot! Must hide the kid! Must runaway! Hide the kid and runaway . . . A gunshot! Runaway with . . . doh!" You could describe either one as cowardly, however, if you do, it only underscores my point "coward" does not describe facts.
Since, I presume his profession isn't warrior or emergency rescuer, the word "coward" shouldn't even apply. BTW, I wouldn't trust him under stress without training, and perhaps without Attention Deficit meds. You also can't read affection for his girlfriend and kids in anything he did; she'll have his other behaviors to judge from, too.
liberalmuse
(18,881 posts)...in a situation like this, but it does have a lot to do with one's basic character. If you are prone to helping others on a daily basis, or have a sense of honor and commitment towards others, then it is likely you would stay and help someone. I think it is clearly apparent that this guy went well above and beyond reacting to the fear instinct. Assholes don't automatically turn into superheros, and honorable human beings don't automatically turn into cowards in a split second.
JI7
(93,616 posts)said a lot about him also.
kurtzapril4
(1,353 posts)I was walking along on the Boulevard one evening with a friend, chatting and minding our own businesses. A car full of young men pulls up near us, starts swearing and throwing bottles, get out and start approaching us. One of the bottles rolled over to my feet. My mind then went blank. Apparently, I grabbed the bottle, busted it on the curb, and advanced towards the guys with the broken end of the bottle. The guys got back in their car and drove away. I "woke up" with a busted bottle in my hand, bleeding.
Now, according to your theory, I'm a super-hero. Let me tell you, *I* had nothing to do with how I reacted. Absolutely nothing.
This guy is a coward like I am Wonder Woman. I fucking run away from spiders.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)We were in the ocean and a shark was spotted. My mom dropped everything and took off.
You can't always tell the ancient lizard part of your brain what to do.
Fight or flight response took millions of years to evolve. It ain't going nowhere soon.
Zalatix
(8,994 posts)First of all... I can't find it in my heart to make excuses for this guy, or your mother unfortunately, but the problem here is once you make a mistake in life, and the Internet catches you, it never forgets. Ever.
It's like a fucking death sentence.
It used to be that you made a mistake, you took your lumps, you paid your meta-debt to society, lesson learned, move on. Not anymore. This man will be branded for life. Regret will be irrelevant.
LisaL
(47,423 posts)what it is you did.
Zalatix
(8,994 posts)At that point it doesn't matter if you field an interview or not. "They" are coming after you regardless.
It might have been better to have the interview and try to clear up the air... the latter being a huge and predictable (even inevitable) failure on his part.
LisaL
(47,423 posts)He gave a number of interviews, I know nothing about him being caught on any video.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)I am also 100% sure that if you asked my mother before it happened that she would have said the same thing.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)That's what some of the posters don't seem to get.
Your mother acted cowardly, by definition. You maybe understand her actions, forgive her for them. And maybe other mothers would have reacted the same way. But none of that changes the fact that if you fail to behave courageously in the face of danger, that is by definition cowardly.
Of course, there may be a difference between your mother's behavior and this guy's. He actually was holding the baby, and he put the baby down to be either shot or stomped on by others in the theater (because the baby was crying, which he feared would draw the shooter's attention to himself), with no regard for the baby or anyone but himself. He had the power to save the baby. It's possible your mother was not in a position to save you or do much about the situation, except to get out of it and yell for you to do the same. That is a big difference, if that was the case.
But glad the shark didn't eat you.
Ilsa
(64,371 posts)I can't blame him for being ill-prepared for such an event.
Tom Ripley
(4,945 posts)Generic Brad
(14,374 posts)I've seen people in shock do a lot of strange, out of character things in my life. Cut the guy some slack.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Obviously the guy who did stay and helped the mother get out, did the right thing and is a hero for risking his own life to save the lives of others.
But no one knows how they would react until they are in the same situation.
I have often asked myself that question 'what would I have done had I been in Germany, eg, when the Nazis came knocking on the door looking for a neighbor I was hiding and threatened me and my family with death if I did not cooperate'. I'd like to think I would tell them to go to hell, but who knows? A lot more people than we hear about, failed that test, mostly because people are human and not everyone is a hero. Humans are complex.
I know this though, I do not envy him, as he has to live with what he did.
Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)But I haven't, and I hope I never do. No one ever truly knows how they will react to something like this until it happens to them. Fear and panic are powerful things.
Poll_Blind
(23,864 posts)The actions of a person in a state of shock are not something to mock.
PB
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Zalatix
(8,994 posts)It's not right to abandon your kids. It's just not right.
But as many people here have aptly said, you can't tell what you'll do in a situation like that.
kentauros
(29,414 posts)Not to mention the idea that all people become perfect parents the moment they have a child.
What's truly sad is seeing just how much work we still have in accepting the concept of forgiveness.
Kaleva
(40,365 posts)I've seen it many times when I was in the Navy and being a member of a volunteer fire department as to how folks react differently to a crisis situation.
LisaL
(47,423 posts)So does his fiancee. She managed to save both kids with the help of a stranger.
Kaleva
(40,365 posts)And yes, he does now know how he'll react in such a situation and he's going to live with that for the rest of his life. I imagine some won't let him forget it either.
LisaL
(47,423 posts)JI7
(93,616 posts)and ran out. it wasn't that he didn't shield the girlfriend. it was more about the kids. especially the one he was holding.
Zalatix
(8,994 posts)How fortunate most of us are that we'll never have our sins aired out in front of the world.
LisaL
(47,423 posts)to give interviews about it.
Zalatix
(8,994 posts)Did this situation somehow affect you?
LisaL
(47,423 posts)Zalatix
(8,994 posts)It is likely that what he did was going to go public anyway. Stuff like that has a way of getting out.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Im guessing that 10 or 15% of these keyboard warriors would behave the same when facing live bullets. Its why the military trains, fer chrissake... so you keep your wits about you in an intensely stressful situation.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Alduin
(501 posts)He deserves the backlash. His fiancee should've left him. If he's not willing to die for her, he doesn't deserve her.
jaysunb
(11,856 posts)Ya just never know how you'll react....
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)nadine_mn
(3,702 posts)Him though. Yes, looking back his behavior was bad, but it was dark, chaotic, bullets flying, and people screaming...really at that point it's all instinct kicking in, no thought. Self preservation is a powerful instinct.
Some people show amazing courage and bravery, some people freeze, and some run. I doubt he was thinking anything but flee.
LisaL
(47,423 posts)tblue37
(68,436 posts)"There is a fundraiser set up on indiegogo for Jarell Brooks to help him as he recovers and can't work and to aid him with tuition costs when he enters college in the fall."
Edited to provide full link to the fundraising page for him and also to include this comment from another site about an MLK quote that young Mr. Brooks posted on his Facebook page earlier this year:
http://www.indiegogo.com/jarellthehero
[font color = "blue"] "Earlier this year, Jarell posted this MLK quote on his Facebook page: 'The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy.' [/font]From http://madamenoire.com/tag/jamie-rohr/It sounds as though Mr. Brooks has given real thought to what sort of person he wishes to be.
Initech
(108,783 posts)NickB79
(20,356 posts)Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)But I'm not so sure I'd use a comedian as an expert on panic.
NickB79
(20,356 posts)kurtzapril4
(1,353 posts)Zalatix
(8,994 posts)FedUpWithIt All
(4,442 posts)I think Mr. Rohrs will do enough judging of himself over the years. I feel for him and his family.
barbtries
(31,308 posts)not the most courageous response. human, but kind of skanky. i wouldn't pile on him though because it sounds as if he's pretty upset with himself and he did come clean.
i have to say that none of us can KNOW what we would do in that circumstance. we'd all like to think that we'd be brave and protective of our loved ones, but until we've been faced with the actual reality we really don't know that.
what is your response?
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)cow·ard
[kou-erd] Show IPA
noun
1.
a person who lacks courage in facing danger, difficulty, opposition, pain, etc.; a timid or easily intimidated person.
Whether I or others would also have been cowards is a different matter. It doesn't take away from the fact that he was a coward. Even worse, he totally abrogated his responsibility to protect a vulnerable, innocent baby who was incapable of protecting himself in any way.
Is your point that if I had reacted the same way, then that would make it okay and not cowardice? Not so. That would make TWO people who acted cowardly.
But I've been tested sort of a couple of times. I know that I have some sort of adrenalin response to things. Although a female and not particularly brave, I have an instinct to help, when I sense danger. I can't help it. It's a reaction. Altho I've never been tested with gunfire. Still, I don't think at my core that I am capable of leaving a baby behind in danger. I'm just not capable of it, I don't think. Just like the mother didn't leave her baby behind. Some people just cannot do that. And some people can.
barbtries
(31,308 posts)i don't think it was okay.
i have jumped into a pool after a rambunctious toddler and into the ocean after two of them. so i know i have the impetus to help. but in neither case was i threatened with danger myself.
i cannot imagine leaving my child behind the way he did. i don't know how many times i have imagined having the ability to put myself in my daughter's place so that i could die instead of her. i do not "excuse" what he did, i only meant to offer that we really don't know how we would react in that situation until we are faced with it.
what would you like to see happen here? should he be brought up on charges? i just don't need to kick a man when he's down. i am taking the position that he's being very hard on himself. it can't be easy to be put to the test and fail.
yes he displayed cowardice. it is one of the panoply of human reactions. it does not speak well of this young man, but was it criminal?
LisaL
(47,423 posts)But I am kind of amazed how press was trying to make it a heart warming romantic story. After all he proposed.
Are_grits_groceries
(17,139 posts)and neither does anybody else. We are shaped by internal and external factors that we may not even be able to recognize.
I THINK I would do something sensible. I HOPE I would do something sensible. I don't ever want to find out. I don't want any of you to find out.
Many are whacking him because he abandoned his kid. Absolute chaos and fear can make people do unimaginable deeds. Some are perceived as heroes because they acted one way, and others are pilloried because they didn't. It has nothing to do with how good a father he is.
Read some more stories about what people have done under stress. There will be just as many that we call good and that we call bad.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)That would mean that you, in addition to him, or me (if I had reacted that way), would all have acted cowardly.
What he did is the pure definition of cowardice. There's no denying it. There may be reasons for it. It may have been a gut reaction, as opposed to a thought-out plan to save himself. But all that doesn't matter. Cowardice is failing to have courage when faced with danger. He was a coward, pure and simple. If the account is true.
Are_grits_groceries
(17,139 posts)In addition, panic can create an automatic response. You automatically react in a certain way because of a myriad of factors. You don't sit and plan to do what happened.
That may be a definition of cowardice to some. It's not mine. When I would question his actions are when his panic subsided. Then he does think and react to some plan that has formed in his mind.
LisaL
(47,423 posts)Swede
(39,492 posts)This guy is not the villain here,just a mere human being acting under extreme danger.
alphafemale
(18,497 posts)True nature revealed.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)All that does is mean that both people would have acted cowardly.
I like to think that I could never leave a vulnerable, innocent baby in danger, to run and save myself, especially my own baby. I don't think I have it in me to do that, on a basic, instinctual level. Still, I haven't been tested in a gunfire situation. But if I would do that, that would be a cowardly act. No gettin' around that. That is what "coward" means.
alphafemale
(18,497 posts)And yes it is something that should be judged.
ProdigalJunkMail
(12,017 posts)with the bullshit phrase, 'no one knows how they will react' is staggering.
You might not know how one will react but you can damn sure see from his reaction that he is a coward and a complete piece of dogshit for leaving his family behind.
holy fuck...
sP
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Instead of what that would really mean: that even MORE people would have reacted cowardly.
To leave an innocent, vulnerable baby on a floor in the midst of gunfire, as well as the woman you supposedly love and her other child, to run like a rabbit and save yourself = that's exactly what a coward is.
If she marries him and they run into serious financial trouble, she should be prepared to make it on her own with her kids, because he won't be courageous in the face of such serious trouble. His concern will be for himself. If there's a house fire, she should have a plan to get her children out by herself; she now knows he will run for the hills, alone, to save himself, and leave his children to burn alive, if necessary. That is who he is, at his core. Doesn't matter why. That is his reaction to danger.
TalkingDog
(9,001 posts)I sure as hell didn't. Saying the man was in a blind panic or saying the fight or flight instinct kicked in IS NOT THE SAME THING as saying what he did was OKAY.
The point we (those of us who aren't condemning him as a coward) are trying to make is: He reacted the way he reacted. His instincts took over, he was in a panic. That doesn't let him off the hook for endangering his child.
It means is we refuse to condemn him for reacting in a human way. Because most of the people "giving him a pass" actually know what it is like to be human. We can't and won't judge him for that.
As for the rest of what you wrote: I actually agree. Given that he doesn't do well under extreme (and by extreme I mean the most extreme) situations, the mom should either make sure he gets training in how to handle emergency situations or never leave the kids alone with him.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)to excuse his cowardice.
He acted like a human....a cowardly human. That is a factual statement, not a judgment. The definition of coward is lack of courage in a dangerous situation. Well, that's him to a tee. A coward.
Not beating him down for it. It's just that others seem to want to not call it what it is. Calling something what it is is not being mean. It's being honest.
Other posts say "I refuse to judge hm." In other words, they won't even voice a negative opinion about throwing your crying baby on the floor to be stomped on or shot, so you can make a quiet getaway? If a person won't call that what it is, why bother responding to the OP at all?
Maybe others would have done that. But no others did that. And they were all in the same panic mode. The gf got seriously injured and still managed to get her baby and her other child out of there, AND hunt the bf down. Let's call that what it is: heroism. Courage in the face of danger, while in panic mode.
Alduin
(501 posts)The guy was a piece of crap for leaving his fiancee, and more importantly, a helpless infant behind.
I don't know why others here are saying "Well, we don't know how we would act." We don't, but we do know how the guy reacted, and it was cowardly.
Carolina
(6,960 posts)How ANY adult could toss an infant -- his own baby boy -- aside and run is beyond words. This guy not only ran out of the theater, he got in his vehicle and drove away. Then had the nerve to appear on TV cradling that precious infant he had abandoned to save his own sorry hide.
I don't give him a pass and hope the young woman wakes up because this is is the sort of guy who will cut and run when the going gets tough. PERIOD.
FreeJoe
(1,039 posts)That seems almost as surprising to me as the guy fleeing in panic. If you can't afford a sitter, trade off with friends or wait for the video. Don't subject your young children to movies like that.
alphafemale
(18,497 posts)Sound of completely missing the bigger issue.
Mass murder AND Not having a baby-sitter and going to a PG movie.
Kind a like plowing through a child strewn bus stop and killing them all or striding the crosswalk when the light is red but nothing is coming.
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)That was a valid point. Too bad you missed it.
Iggo
(49,927 posts)southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)I would get my family out first. But you never know. I pray to god I will never have to find out either.
LisaL
(47,423 posts)southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)and everyone jumping on him isn't going to change the facts. I would say to people leave it alone so he and his wife can get past it. Calling him a chicken does nothing.
LisaL
(47,423 posts)And are you saying that nothing should be discussed if it already happened and discussing it won't change the facts?
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)By the why I guess you know he did ask her to marry him. I forgot that.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)Some of the responses of the hindsight heroes in this thread. As if they actually know what "they would have done" in the same situation. Big, tough talk is cheap, just like those that do it the loudest.
LisaL
(47,423 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)Last edited Sat Jul 28, 2012, 01:30 PM - Edit history (1)
Panic affects each person differently. Fight or flight is the most basic of human responses to a deadly confrontation. Not asingle one of us that wasn't there, can say with any degree of certainty, what we would have done. It's easy and pretty damn crappy to sit at a keyboard and run off at the mouth about "how much courage we would have had, if it were me."
Carolina
(6,960 posts)I (along with most parents) could never have abandoned my baby. It just wouldn't happen, no matter what the circumstances.
This guy tossed his baby aside, fled from the theater and DROVE AWAY! He especially deserving of scorn since hours later he was all over the TV cradling that very infant. What a POS
99Forever
(14,524 posts)Have you ever been faced with a hail of deadly gunfire in a darkened teargas filled killroom with hundreds of others trying to get the hell out of there through a VERY limited number of exits. We all would like to believe that we wouldn't react as this guy did. But the reality is, until you are facing the real world possibility of dying right there and then, you have no way of knowing what you might do. I'm not defending his actions, by any means, but if being under unthinkable duress causing someone to act in an inappropriate manner has any validity at all, it has to apply here.
Keyboard tough is easy. Real world?
Not so much.
And one more thing that I find disgusting. This guy didn't shoot ANYONE, but that doesn't seem to stop the self-righteous, hindsighters from painting a VICTIM as the bad guy. Shame on you.
POS, indeed.
LisaL
(47,423 posts)And a stranger got shot trying to help his girlfriend and kids.
I am not sure what do you expect people to think about that?
99Forever
(14,524 posts).. not be laying unneeded guilt trips on victims that panic when they are staring death in the eye. But I guess that's something you are too brave and good to understand.
meh.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Of course not. But even if 20 other people had done that, they ALL would have acted cowardly. It doesn't make it brave or not cowardly if others do it, too.
Doesn't matter why he did it. All that matters is that at his core, he is a coward, pure and simple. He threw down a crying baby because, as he put it, he was afraid the crying would draw the attention of the shooter to himself, so he put the baby down on the ground (to be shot or trompled to death), so he could more easily run to save himself. That is how a coward acts.
Thank goodness most people aren't that cowardly, when faced with danger....as we saw in the reactions by the others in the theater and in other life threatening situations. There are heroes among us. This guy isn't one of 'em. Not too many people would be able to put a baby in death's way to save his/her own skin.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)... keyboard warrior passes judgment on someone put into a situation they themselves will likely ( & hopefully) never face.
You're compassion for victims overwhelms me.
Carolina
(6,960 posts)certainly when my son was a baby, I know I would never have abandoned him in any circumstances.
Sure, I am thankful that I never faced a hail of bullets, but I put my child's needs ahead of my own comfort, convenience and fun until he was a grown man. I know in my gut and heart, that in a life or death situation, I surely could not have deserted him. Perhaps it's maternal instinct
But shame on you, too for being such an aopologist for this guy. He ran, no, DROVE away and then had the nerve to appear all over the airwaves cradling the same baby he'd cast aside to save his own sorry hide. If you can excuse that, then you must be of similar ilk!!!
99Forever
(14,524 posts)"I never faced a hail of bullets,.."
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)they would all be cowards. The definition doesn't change, depending on how many people do it.
No doubt about it: To run for your life and put an innocent, vulnerable baby on the ground to be shot or stomped on, is a cowardly act. Even if you would have done it, too. Even if I would've done it. Even if "she" would've done it.
I don't know exactly how I would have behaved. But I know this: At my core, in my heart of hearts...I don't have it in me to do that to a baby. Or even to my dog. But if I had acted that way, it still would have been cowardly. The fact that I did it, doesn't make it okay that he did it, too.
To put an innocent baby on the ground to be stompeded on or shot...now THAT is what's disgusting. I call it for what it is: cowardice.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)... facing all the danger of sitting in front of your monitor typing into your keyboard.
meh.
Zalatix
(8,994 posts)But none of us can say that we won't until it does happen. And we all better pray it doesn't.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Or that they would never do this themselves. The louder they condemn this guy, the more they can try to feel sure they would never do the same thing.
Although I do have a hard time with putting the baby down. I'm not even a mother, but if I had a baby, the first thing I'd do is run with that baby. That's why I'd feel justified in just running from my fiancé.
LisaL
(47,423 posts)Thinking they are are going to behave the same way?
treestar
(82,383 posts)And we all are - most of us get to live a life without facing such a thing as this, but we like to think we'd do the most heroic thing. Yet we really can't know. But we get to pass judgment on this guy. Problem is we never faced what he faced. Most of us never will.
LisaL
(47,423 posts)I wouldn't describe saving his own infant as "the most heroic thing." Most people expect parents to do that.
treestar
(82,383 posts)All I'm saying is, we have no idea what we will do and hopefully never have to know. We're passing judgment on someone else, so we can at least acknowledge we don't know if we are any better than he is.
hedgehog
(36,286 posts)arely staircase
(12,482 posts)KG
(28,795 posts)eilen
(4,955 posts)poor kids.
I can't think of one good reason to bring an infant and toddler to a movie theater after midnight.
Most people in that situation would wait for it OnDemand.
spooky3
(38,633 posts)LisaL
(47,423 posts)LisaL
(47,423 posts)She managed to save both of them and got shot in the process. So the kids are lucky they have her.
spooky3
(38,633 posts)Incredibly poor parenting.
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)at a late night Batman movie that they had a small segment about it. the interviewed the mom.
EX500rider
(12,583 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)net that allows these world wide attacks. they are ugly.
LisaL
(47,423 posts)I am just saying.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)mentality.
that is what this feels like, to me.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)for bullying's sake.
But to say his actions were cowardly is not bullying. It's merely stating a fact. If one is going to have any reaction, it should be an honest one. No one is saying he should be charged with a crime.
LisaL
(47,423 posts)Especially in comparison with other stories from the same theater shooting, where people behaved heroically, including a 13 year old girl.
Zalatix
(8,994 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)with a whole lot of justification.
tawadi
(2,110 posts)Crazy story, nonetheless.
LisaL
(47,423 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)I know that most likely I will react by training... (hit the deck HARD) and find cover... (The later in a theater, not easy)
But will not judge what people will do in a situation like this.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)... of the latest MASS MURDERING SHOOTING and demonize him?
What and who aren't you focusing on if you're beating the crap out of some poor guy that had a bad panic reaction in an untenable situation? Just who do you people think made sure this "story" surfaced?
Good fucking grief people. You want to see some COWARDS? Go to Washington DC and 50 statehouses across this Nation and talk to the fucking poultry there that lets this shit happen over and over and over again, and ask them what the fuck they are going to do about it.
Nah, that wouldn't be as easy as brow beating some poor tortured overwhelmed soul, anonymously on the internet, would it?
Now I remember why I like my dogs do much better than most people.
JI7
(93,616 posts)if he would have just shut up or just thanked the guy who did help his girlfriend and kids it would be left at that.
but he is changing the story around to make it seem like what he did wasn't too bad and fake crying all the time.
he made no mention of the guy who actually did put his life in danger to help the girlfirend and kids on piers morgan .
99Forever
(14,524 posts)Whateveryousay.
MrSlayer
(22,143 posts)Leave your infant? Just put him down and leave? And your other child? And your wife? This is totally craven behavior. What woman would stay with this guy? The question of whether or not he'd protect his family is clearly answered. No. Not just no but fuck no. And not even just fuck no, this is "I dont give a fuck about anyone but myself" kind of deriliction of duty. At the very least you keep them together and get on top of them, cover them with your body.
He's not the villain here, he didn't shoot up the place but he is a stone coward and no one likes a coward. He'll never live this down.
I see a divorce and change of residence in his future.
Beacool
(30,518 posts)The guy is worthless. To leave her and his children was bad enough, but then he drove away?????????
Lousy coward doesn't deserve either of the three.
In case some think that I'm being harsh, I was in the North Tower on 9/11. I was on the next to last PATH train that made it to the WTC. I saw enough people die that day and thought I was going to die too when the 2nd plane crashed into the South Tower literally across the street from where I was walking. Many acts of selflessness took place that morning.
So I have no sympathy for some jerk who leaves his family behind.
LisaL
(47,423 posts)So it appears she intends to marry him.
Just wow.
Beacool
(30,518 posts)He proved that in a real emergency she and their kids can't count on him.
boston bean
(36,931 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)And shocking, it has none with being a "hero" or anything like that. Two reasons.
1.- Training. The natural flight or fight means leaving if possible. Training taught me to well hit the ground, asses, look for safe egress if tat exists, cover if that exists / help others once the shooting stops. Chief priority, stay unhurt, so can help others This lasted 90 seconds.
2.- I have already been in situations where training, not heroics, took over. While lookie looks were trying to watch a hot stop, for example, I pulled sister and friend behind cover...only one that did that, but had very little to do with being a hero, and all to do with training.
Since we're having way too many of these any longer, I am assessing every location I regularly visit for cover, egress and all that. Nope, not heroics, training.
Beacool
(30,518 posts)Although I haven't had any training, since 9/11 I look for every exit in a public place. On airplanes I count how many rows to the exit doors in front and behind me. I don't make a fuzz over it, just a mental note.
Cherchez la Femme
(2,488 posts)Brave sir robin ran away.
Bravely ran away away.
When danger reared it's ugly head
He bravely turned his tail and fled.
Yes brave sir robin turned about
And gallantly he chickened out.
****bravely**** taking to his feet
He beat a very brave retreat.
Bravest of the braaaave sir robin!