General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLucky Luciano
(11,258 posts)wasupaloopa
(4,516 posts)femmedem
(8,207 posts)The remaining two precincts and the remaining absentees all lean R. No source on that, except it's all over twitter with screen shots.
bottomofthehill
(8,346 posts)sweetloukillbot
(11,066 posts)sweetloukillbot
(11,066 posts)That seems a tall order
Iwasthere
(3,170 posts)They will need 80% of remaining ? To overcome Lamb's lead?
pimpbot
(940 posts)If the absentee percentages follow the current trends, it would be +384 for Saccone, meaning Lamb up by 463.
HOWEVER! There are still two precincts left in Westmoreland to report. They are busy finding ~400 extra votes right now.
ecstatic
(32,729 posts)Even if Saccone gets 60% of the 3206 absentee ballots, he still loses by around 200 votes.
DeminPennswoods
(15,290 posts)Assuming these ballots break down like the live vote, looks like Saccone will end up pulling this out.
I figure +116 in Greene, +583 in Wash and +1026 in Westmoreland. That gives Saccone probably a 900 vote win.
ETA: Arithmetic not my strong suit.
LexVegas
(6,094 posts)Igel
(35,350 posts)It's a prediction.
The only time predictions stop being fuzzy is when things are deterministic or after the fact.
LexVegas
(6,094 posts)a kennedy
(29,706 posts)DeminPennswoods
(15,290 posts)That'd be Greene+84, Wash+66, Westmoreland+252, total +392, not enough.
LAS14
(13,783 posts)... as today's votes, Lamb will win by 147 votes. Does anyone know what to expect from absentee ballots?
John King - CNN
redwitch
(14,946 posts)If Lamb takes say .38 of them thats 1218 plus his current lead of 875=2093.
Saccone takes .62=1988.
I think. I suck at math!