Next week's "New Yorker," making heads explode for body shaming the Body Shamer In Chief

[Miles Archer]

[dalton99a]

1. BREAKTHROUGH: Scientists succeed in halibut head implant

[jberryhill]

2. IMHO that is not body shaming

That depiction is likely flattering in comparison to reality.

[bettyellen]

3. Yeah, its actually flattering.

[jberryhill]

7. Looks more like a cherub than Jabba the Hutt

[Ms. Toad]

14. I agree.

While it isn't flattering - my immediate thought was it was a play on the emperor with no clothes.

[mr_lebowski]

4. A pretty obvious 'Emperor Has No Clothes' reference as opposed to any 'body image' connotation imo

[Anon-C]

5. A fact their criticism conveniently ignores. Nt

[DeminPennswoods]

16. Yes, a reference to "Emporer Has No Clothes"

not body-shaming.

[highplainsdem]

6. Fox News was whining about that yesterday:

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/03/16/outrage-over-new-yorker-mags-repulsive-body-shamping-president-trump.html

[Kirk Lover]

8. Hey now...that's a mighty tiny podium ya got there bub.

[tavernier]

9. How hard is it to distinguish the message

“The Emperor Has No Clothes” from fat shaming?

Spin away, faux news.

[jeffreyi]

10. What's the problem?

Hides the diaper, no?

[Maraya1969]

11. The Emperor has no clothes! That's the message. That he is also fat is just facts

[peggysue2]

12. Love the . . .

tiny hands depicted so well. so small and baby-like.

Hahahaha!

[milestogo]

13. That is actually a very flattering representation of Trump, as far as I can tell.

[Boomerproud]

15. Anything that causes the folks at Faux emotional pain

is fine by me.

[Hekate]

17. It's a reference to the classic fairytale "The Emperor's New Clothes"

Spoiler alert: He was naked when he went on parade, having been fooled into thinking he was clothed in the finest.