General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGeneva Motor Show Debuts 2 flying car concepts
On the ground, the speed range is 50 kilometers per hour up to 160 kilometers per hour (30 to 100 miles per hour). The top speed acceleration is just under nine seconds. The engine of 100 horsepower has a fuel economy of 7.61/100 kilometer with a range of 1315 kilometer (817 miles).
The Pop.Up Next from Airbus and Audi
The power of a driving vehicle with autonomous driving was also on display at the Geneva Motor Show. Airbus and Audi introduced the Pop.Up Next, the follow to the Pop.Up now with self-driving technology on the road that can vertically lift into the air like a helicopter.
The vehicle is a two-seat passenger that has a 60-kW (80-hp) electric powered sled for autonomous driving on the ground. The top speed is 100 kilometers per hour (62 miles per hour) and the 15 kilowatt-hour battery has a 130-kilometer (81-mile) range.
Whole article and more pictures here:
http://www.machinedesign.com/mechanical/sky-it-s-flying-cars?NL=MACD-001&Issue=MACD-001_20180323_MACD-001_545&sfvc4enews=42&cl=article_1_b&utm_rid=CPG05000002209975&utm_campaign=16130&utm_medium=email&elq2=a9daf07e351c490397afa378104b1887
Matthew28
(1,797 posts)But wake me when they're being sold to consumers.
FSogol
(45,473 posts)AllaN01Bear
(18,148 posts)these car makers have been promesing these type of cars since the 30s . wont happen espically when the patent attorneys and the product liability attorneys will sue the minute these things hit the production line . then theres regulatory issues . in this country who would govern the flying aspect(faa) then who would govern the road aspect of the machines? the state dmv? also would one need flying lessons ? ( im assuming so) also where would they depart and land from? ( im sure not from public roads . lots of questions.
FSogol
(45,473 posts)marble falls
(57,075 posts)chowder66
(9,067 posts)marble falls
(57,075 posts)is the video of the cat playing a theremin.
chowder66
(9,067 posts)marble falls
(57,075 posts)chowder66
(9,067 posts)marble falls
(57,075 posts)chowder66
(9,067 posts)Slowly I turned...step by step, inch by inch
AllaN01Bear
(18,148 posts)and fold into a briefcase.
marble falls
(57,075 posts)GetRidOfThem
(869 posts)Cars and planes don't mix, period. A car needs to have an entirely different weight distribution than an aircraft, it is supposed to hug the road and handle curves without slipping on the pavement.. An aircraft is supposed to hand g forces not by friction (unlike a car), and tries to keep the center of gravity ahead of the center of lift.
You combine aircraft and car you get (a) a car that does not drive very well, and (b) a flying contraption that does not fly very well.
But it is fun sci-fi stuff. I remember the contraption of a car that had a Cessna Skymaster's wings detachable from the roof - it was even in a Bond movie. Yes, it would be so cool to lift off into the air with your - ahem - car.
But there is also another reason why these concepts fail: Learning to fly a plane is a much more complicated process than learning to drive a car. The mass market appeal would never work, because too few people would actually be licensed to fly the clunker.
(I am both a car driver, amateur mechanic, and a pilot...)
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Screw that.
If they don't have a car/plane that also works as a submarine, then what good is it?
ProfessorGAC
(64,995 posts)Well, for a little while, anyway. Then there's the whole filling up with water thing, but for that first 5 minutes, smooth as silk.
spanone
(135,818 posts)0rganism
(23,940 posts)sometimes i fear for the future
DFW
(54,341 posts)...where the cost of collision insurance would be triple the cost of the vehicle.