General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCambridge Analytica has most likely stolen information about every single person on Facebook.
Does anyone else think congress should regulate our information? Do you think its pointless? It seems to me that all of these security breaches or giveaways signal a large problem that needs a solution.
Stallion
(6,474 posts)Ilsa
(61,691 posts)and have not even posted a picture of ourselves?
onecaliberal
(32,812 posts)mythology
(9,527 posts)Facebook tracks you through any site that has a Facebook like button for example. A Belgian committee found Facebook was tracking even non-users.
They get data from you based on far more than just being on the Facebook page itself.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,315 posts)when presented with different content and options. What do you like, what do you share, how do you react to things you see? It's the behavioral information that is worth a lot of money. Consumer brands have been doing this kind of stuff for years -- coupons, food labels for school money, that kind of thing. It's the same idea. It's now taking off hugely in the HR sphere -- employers love to know how employees are feeling and what they might do next.
So knowing that, how do you regulate information about your behavior? It's what much of our consumer economy is built on.
onecaliberal
(32,812 posts)WhiskeyGrinder
(22,315 posts)mythology
(9,527 posts)It's easier to compile vast amounts of data for far more people and be more accurate than ever before.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,315 posts)The problem is many people tend to think this is a problem that can be solved by not using Facebook, or by using a fake name when signing up for Twitter, or whatever. If you're on a website, use company email, use cash only sometimes, use a mobile app, visit a website, any of it -- that generates data, and many, many organizations find that data very, very valuable.
Volaris
(10,269 posts)That what porn I watch or what online classes I take can be used to swing a national election, they're fuckin crazy lol.
Cause I would just LOVE to see the candidate that courts my vote for THAT shit.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,315 posts)model that gets better and better about predicting what you might do next, and how best to monetize it. Some people find that creepy. Some people have a problem with it. Some don't. DU could provide some fantastic behavioral data for the Democratic Party -- if the admins are collecting it, and willing to sell.
Volaris
(10,269 posts)Most of my available currency goes to the local community college so the porn I watch is free. That combined with a decent adblocker=
They can try to monetize that all they want, it won't fuckin work lol
(On edit) I would, however, pay extra for truly ad - free Internet on both my phone and home Internet connections.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,315 posts)It's about what you *do.* What you watch, what you watch *next,* what you watch again, what other websites you visit, what websites you visit while you're watching. Some people aren't bothered by behavioral information being tracked and commodified, because they believe they're smarter than the algorithms, or that it doesn't matter because it's not linked to them personally. But the more data there is in a set, the better the predictions and manipulations are. Whatever you do online, even if you're blocking and not clicking on ads, it's building a data set that someone, somewhere, wants and is willing to pay for.
Volaris
(10,269 posts)Because if that were enough to cover my phone bill every month, I'd probably be down with them doing that.
I get free phone service, they get to sell my data. Otherwise, the Department of Whatever should run a Publicly-owned cellular service and I'll pay an extra 1% in taxes to pay for it.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,315 posts)FarCenter
(19,429 posts)They are alleged to have data on 50 million users collected in a targeted campaign.