General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsKrugman: "I called Ryan for what he was almost 8 years ago." Yes, you did.
Link to tweet
?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet
And Krugman has posted several new tweets with more reasons why we should not be impressed with Speaker Ryan.
BootinUp
(51,464 posts)spooky3
(38,714 posts)And he does an excellent job explaining why, and citing evidence.
BootinUp
(51,464 posts)yep.
wasupaloopa
(4,516 posts)to destroy the safety net. He put cuts in it but he did not destroy it.
The plan was to cut income then complain we cant afford domestic spending.
He helped cut income but step two will be in our hands next year not his.
spooky3
(38,714 posts)reminding us of the GOP tax and spending bills that he helped push through that explode the debt and deficits.
spooky3
(38,714 posts)(on Lawrence O'Donnell's show).
Kurt V.
(5,624 posts)Supposed serious policy wonks, is why i reject conservatism in it's entirety. thanks Paul!!
dalton99a
(94,677 posts)certainot
(9,090 posts)NoMoreRepugs
(12,151 posts)Rash Limpballs and Faux that DEMOHCRATS (I accentuate the O for the goobers) are the big spenders and if u care about the deficit vote REEEPUBLICAN.
Geez, howz that working out fellas?
OneBro
(1,159 posts)Great quote from the article: But its the audacity of dopes. Mr. Ryan isnt offering fresh food for thought; hes serving up leftovers from the 1990s, drenched in flimflam sauce.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)spooky3
(38,714 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)But I thought he might be on other shows that I don't watch.
Hamlette
(15,556 posts)spooky3
(38,714 posts)Cha
(319,536 posts)Thank you!
spooky3
(38,714 posts)Cha
(319,536 posts)different than any winter and spring I've experienced here.
How's it where you are?
spooky3
(38,714 posts)fishwax
(29,346 posts)God, what a great line.
Paul Ryan has not been good for this country. Krugman, though, is a national treasure.