General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI find the term "true Democrats" as offensive as "true Americans".
Who are you to piss and moan about WHY I vote Dem?
Like it or not, Ben Nelson and Blanche Lincoln helped pass Health Insurance Reform.
pnwmom
(110,260 posts)And losing all those blue dogs in the House gave us John Boehner instead of Nancy Pelosi.
Panasonic
(2,921 posts)and I certainly am one of them.
I am itching to throw out one of my own - a person named Michael Bennet - he's DLC, Blue Dog Dem, and always an ass.
dkf
(37,305 posts)Panasonic
(2,921 posts)No. I want a primary election without any money influencing the election - a real progressive Democrat vs a blue dog Democrat - which one would the voters rather have - a honest to God Democrat that'll work for you, and not be sold out to the wealthy.
Besides, the Republicans aren't going to control anything anytime soon. They are going to face a massive loss in '12, mostly thanks to Americans and the social media that's waking every single one up from their stupor.
Republicans were elected in '10 for one reason only - and they FAILED to deliver that promise to the ordinary Americans.
Therefore, the House will return to the Democratic hands, and the Senate actually gains a number of Democrats elected by the people to remove disgusting Republicans that needs to go back to its nearest box rocks.
pasto76
(1,589 posts)the republicans failed to deliver everything between 2000 and 2010. But they won 2 presidential elections and took control of the house away from democrats.
Your choice here in CO is Bennet or a repub. Your make believe land where we can have another senator who you like more doesnt exist
pnwmom
(110,260 posts)I'll take a blue dog any day than a Rethug.
I will be very surprised if the House goes Democratic in the next election. Polling isn't showing a likelihood of that at all.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,664 posts)They may be DINOs, but they do count in the headcount for who takes Speaker (and can set the committee assignments, agendas, etc...)
Then we get to drag them through the mud for voting against us, but better to play offense than defense.
Panasonic
(2,921 posts)One of the better liberals.
We put her there, because we know who we want. Before DeGette, our rep was the lovely Patricia Schroeder.
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)Empirical evidence, y'know.
mia
(8,480 posts)I agree.
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)Zanzoobar
(894 posts)You are no true Scotsman.
mia
(8,480 posts)I like apple Pie.
quinnox
(20,600 posts)and DINOs feel the same way.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,664 posts)(Not that platforms mean anything).
We know where you stand on regulating the poor bankers. So what drives you to vote with Democrats?
banned from Kos
(4,017 posts)pro choice
pro gay marriage
pro drugs
secular
pro ACLU
anti war
pro Dodd-Frank (bank regs to you)
pro environment
pro alternate energy
pro ESCR
pro science
pro education
pro labor
pro union
pro education
anti school voucher
pro contraception
pro national Health care
pro gun (2nd Amendment)
pro free trade
pro stimulus
pro Obama
A LIBERAL ALL THE WAY!
Ruby the Liberal
(26,664 posts)You have been asked before, by many others. Glad you are addressing it.
banned from Kos
(4,017 posts)I am an old fashioned pro-market liberal.
But, you are right. I don't think I have confessed my positions here.
Panasonic
(2,921 posts)At least sane people who uses guns responsibly.
sarisataka
(22,694 posts)mostly sane.
I learned a new term tonight "Rolling domestic"
We called 911 because we saw a vehicle swerving and it appeared the male driver was hitting a female passenger in the back seat. The police caught up with them and found out the true story.
They are a couple who is engaged, from a culture that does not allow any physical touching before marriage. They were playing a tickling game as they were away from the supervision of their elders.
At no time did I consider confronting them at any stop, even though I was armed at the time. We followed at a reasonable ditance until the police could catch up.
End result was a little embarrassment for all and the police wished them a very happy wedding on our behalf.
Robb
(39,665 posts)dsc
(53,395 posts)that you can't be chair, or ranking member, of a committee if you don't vote with the party all procedural votes which would have made passing health care reform vastly easier.
bullwinkle428
(20,662 posts)R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)quinnox
(20,600 posts)would favor slashing social security, but apparently is too scared to debate the matter directly.
banned from Kos
(4,017 posts)Check the time I posted.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)I wasn't sure where the post was going.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)banned from Kos
(4,017 posts)on DU that might be different.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)You say you are "pro-free trade," and that you are "pro-labor / pro-union."
Unless you're working under some oddball definition of "free trade," different from the one in common usage, you really can't be both.
banned from Kos
(4,017 posts)If Labor wants input on auto quotas then I am pro-labor. There is a reason "free trade" agreements take years to negotiate.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)CreekDog
(46,192 posts)and do so in a way to discourage people from reinstating its strongest measures.
and by the way, that position you hold --it's anti market. what the banks were allowed to do hurt the market more than almost anything thrown at them in decades.
not a pro-market capitalism position. it led to bailouts, government expenditures to help the unemployed with things their former jobs providing prior to it.
banned from Kos
(4,017 posts)I want the strongest regs.
Glass Steagall failed us.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)you're brazen about it too.
you complained about Glass Steagall after it was gutted, saying the weakened version wasn't strong enough.
but you tried to conflate the strong Glass Steagall that existed before it was weakened --which was effective.
comparing what was left of Glass Steagall after most of it was repealed to Dodd Frank is something you know is misleading.
yet you seem determined to convince people of something false just to win the argument.
one thing is for sure, this type of obfuscation is the type that lobbyists have perfected when dealing with the public.
and that my friend, is a talent one can be paid handsomely for doing.
Guy Whitey Corngood
(26,848 posts)for proof or debunk what was said. He gets real quiet all of a sudden.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)How could Glass Steagall fail us if it was repealed in the late 90s? Much of the corruption and implosion on wall street is directly linked to the repeal of Glass Steagall.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,664 posts)Weill was the push behind Phil Gramm because Citi wanted to buy his Traveler's group.
Or did you miss that news last week?
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)In your mind, "Dem" is just the party, so your reasons for voting for "it" don't matter.
To many of us, it is the philosophy and morality behind the label, AND ONLY THAT, that gives it any meaning.
On edit, I also want to add that it is a very stupid comparison. People are BORN American, it is not something (usually) they choose, unlike a party which you choose to suit your beliefs. Dumb analogy indeed!
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Sure, it's nice to have the Majority, but it's what you do with it that counts.
Selatius
(20,441 posts)That's considered too far to the left. Plus, it would've been far easier not to challenge such a wealthy lobby in the run-up to a mid-term election year.
We basically got Romneycare except at the national level.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)political animals can be dealt with on terms that motivate them.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Only those squishy middle-liner conservative blue dogs would be.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)But let's just be clear how much we let those two jokers water-down our health care law.
Did we get their vote on it later? Yeah, after giving them what they wanted. She wanted, demanded to kill the public option --something that would've helped us on the legal front and would've helped us deal with states opting out of Medicaid expansion --see there are complications with the legislation on the exchanges where states don't participate. public option would've been a way to deal with that --another tool. Blanche killed it and lost her election anyway.
Honestly, those two jokers, had they left the health care bill alone, voted for it and lost their elections, would've done more for us than they did when we allowed them to weaken it.
Instead they weakened Obama's principal accomplishment and made the party look weak, made themselves look like vascillators and harmed the law in a way that makes it harder for the public to see results.
They hurt us. You know someone finally read them the riot act and they got on board, but by then the damage was done.
Nobody tells me that they are doing me a favor by being a Democrat when they hold progressive legislation hostage for something worse and support Republican ideas that are un-progressive, but want credit for supporting fewer bad ideas.
There is no soul in being a centrist anymore.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)Zalatix
(8,994 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)...I was kinda hoping for an answer FROM THE OP, that might better explain his objections to Manny's thread.
white_wolf
(6,257 posts)a corporatist sellout and any progressive party would do well to kick them to the curve.
DJ13
(23,671 posts)You have already lost the argument.

woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Zorra
(27,670 posts)helped ruin the country and the Democratic Party by getting Reagan elected, then, to top it off, started the DLC.
And things haven't changed all that much. The country is a total mess, and this mess is totally the fault of pro market Blue Dogs and republicans.
The trash Blue Dogs carry is well earned.
99Forever
(14,524 posts).. as much time and energy keeping Nelson and Lincoln in line, as they do browbeating rank and file members for being VERY disappointed with their crappy track record in doing for THE PEOPLE, they might not have such a crappy track record.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Just wondering...
MotherPetrie
(3,145 posts)And in my my book that ain't a REAL Democrat.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)and I will be proud to admit it. Can't imagine why any Democrat would find it offensive.