Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

banned from Kos

(4,017 posts)
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 09:22 PM Jul 2012

I find the term "true Democrats" as offensive as "true Americans".

Who are you to piss and moan about WHY I vote Dem?

Like it or not, Ben Nelson and Blanche Lincoln helped pass Health Insurance Reform.

59 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I find the term "true Democrats" as offensive as "true Americans". (Original Post) banned from Kos Jul 2012 OP
And they insured that we have a Democratic majority leader. pnwmom Jul 2012 #1
People do NOT want Blue Dogs Panasonic Jul 2012 #20
So you would rather the Republicans control the Senate too? dkf Jul 2012 #22
So that's your answer for every time I want Blue Dogs out? Panasonic Jul 2012 #25
wow you seem to have quite a crystal ball there pasto76 Jul 2012 #34
It does no good for a progressive to win in a primary if s/he can't win the general. pnwmom Jul 2012 #39
Can a progressive win in your district? Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #26
Of course. My representative is Diana DeGette Panasonic Jul 2012 #28
Some folks obviously do. PavePusher Jul 2012 #59
K & R! mia Jul 2012 #2
"No true Scotsman" Spider Jerusalem Jul 2012 #3
This must be a joke Zanzoobar Jul 2012 #24
Thanks for the education. mia Jul 2012 #38
I'm sure a lot of conservadems quinnox Jul 2012 #4
What in the party platform are you in agreement with? Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #5
hilarious - I am banned from Kos Jul 2012 #9
It wasn't meant to be hilarious. Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #13
Now I am glad you asked! banned from Kos Jul 2012 #14
Can one be pro-gun and be pro-gun control? Panasonic Jul 2012 #21
I like to think I am sarisataka Jul 2012 #36
Yes. Zalatix Jul 2012 #57
Coalitions are complicated things. Robb Jul 2012 #6
I think that in the Senate we should at least institute the rule dsc Jul 2012 #7
Like it or not, Ben Nelson also pledged allegiance to Grover Norquist. bullwinkle428 Jul 2012 #8
Who are you replying to? R. Daneel Olivaw Jul 2012 #10
he is replying to a thread that quite rightly said no true Democrat quinnox Jul 2012 #11
Bullshit. I went there (on Manny's thread) banned from Kos Jul 2012 #15
Thank you for clearing that up. R. Daneel Olivaw Jul 2012 #19
What position do you hold that would make us believe you aren't? nt NCTraveler Jul 2012 #12
None. I am pro market (capitalism) but so are most Dems banned from Kos Jul 2012 #17
Depends on how you define "markets" and "capitalism" Scootaloo Jul 2012 #29
Good question. Like Krugman I am pro free trade (meaning anti-tariff) banned from Kos Jul 2012 #33
Why were you banned from Kos? sabrina 1 Jul 2012 #53
you're probably one of the very, very few Democrats that would mislead about Glass Steagall CreekDog Jul 2012 #32
No, I am pro Dodd Frank which is much stronger than Glass Steagall ever was banned from Kos Jul 2012 #35
there you go again with the trickery about Glass Steagall CreekDog Jul 2012 #44
This is a pattern. Make some idiotic remark. Then when people ask Guy Whitey Corngood Jul 2012 #58
You have to help me out on this. R. Daneel Olivaw Jul 2012 #48
So why are Sandy Weill and friends lining up to reinstate it? Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #49
You just proved that you really don't get it. Bonobo Jul 2012 #16
Right. Thanks to Blue Dogs, we got a private insurance law rather than HCR. leveymg Jul 2012 #18
Folks like Ben Nelson and Max Baucus wouldn't have voted for a Public Option. Selatius Jul 2012 #27
Oh, they would have CreekDog Jul 2012 #31
No true Democrat would be offended by the term True Democrat. morningfog Jul 2012 #23
Actually, the problem is that those two always thought they were doing us the favor CreekDog Jul 2012 #30
^That^ 99Forever Jul 2012 #37
So what SHOULD we think of Democrats who propose or support cutting Social Security? pinboy3niner Jul 2012 #40
NOT true Democrats. That's what. Zalatix Jul 2012 #43
Yeah... pinboy3niner Jul 2012 #56
I tend to think of anyone who cuts social security as... white_wolf Jul 2012 #50
If you're holding up Blanche Lincoln & Ben Nelson as role models DJ13 Jul 2012 #41
. CreekDog Jul 2012 #42
I find fake Democrats offensive. nt woo me with science Jul 2012 #45
I suggest you get used to it, or get over it. Centrist "Reagan" Democrats Zorra Jul 2012 #46
Maybe if Dem Party leadership... 99Forever Jul 2012 #47
Hey man, what happened at Kos? whatchamacallit Jul 2012 #51
If they echo Repug talking points, they are DINO's -- and fucking traitors who may as well be Repugs MotherPetrie Jul 2012 #52
Why do you find it offensive? I have no problem with it. You can call me a true Democrat anytime sabrina 1 Jul 2012 #54
unless they are talking about slashing Social Security or something extreme right-wing like that Douglas Carpenter Jul 2012 #55

pnwmom

(110,260 posts)
1. And they insured that we have a Democratic majority leader.
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 09:23 PM
Jul 2012

And losing all those blue dogs in the House gave us John Boehner instead of Nancy Pelosi.

 

Panasonic

(2,921 posts)
20. People do NOT want Blue Dogs
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 10:31 PM
Jul 2012

and I certainly am one of them.

I am itching to throw out one of my own - a person named Michael Bennet - he's DLC, Blue Dog Dem, and always an ass.

 

Panasonic

(2,921 posts)
25. So that's your answer for every time I want Blue Dogs out?
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 10:33 PM
Jul 2012

No. I want a primary election without any money influencing the election - a real progressive Democrat vs a blue dog Democrat - which one would the voters rather have - a honest to God Democrat that'll work for you, and not be sold out to the wealthy.

Besides, the Republicans aren't going to control anything anytime soon. They are going to face a massive loss in '12, mostly thanks to Americans and the social media that's waking every single one up from their stupor.

Republicans were elected in '10 for one reason only - and they FAILED to deliver that promise to the ordinary Americans.

Therefore, the House will return to the Democratic hands, and the Senate actually gains a number of Democrats elected by the people to remove disgusting Republicans that needs to go back to its nearest box rocks.

pasto76

(1,589 posts)
34. wow you seem to have quite a crystal ball there
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 10:53 PM
Jul 2012

the republicans failed to deliver everything between 2000 and 2010. But they won 2 presidential elections and took control of the house away from democrats.
Your choice here in CO is Bennet or a repub. Your make believe land where we can have another senator who you like more doesnt exist

pnwmom

(110,260 posts)
39. It does no good for a progressive to win in a primary if s/he can't win the general.
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 10:58 PM
Jul 2012

I'll take a blue dog any day than a Rethug.

I will be very surprised if the House goes Democratic in the next election. Polling isn't showing a likelihood of that at all.

Ruby the Liberal

(26,664 posts)
26. Can a progressive win in your district?
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 10:35 PM
Jul 2012

They may be DINOs, but they do count in the headcount for who takes Speaker (and can set the committee assignments, agendas, etc...)

Then we get to drag them through the mud for voting against us, but better to play offense than defense.

 

Panasonic

(2,921 posts)
28. Of course. My representative is Diana DeGette
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 10:36 PM
Jul 2012

One of the better liberals.

We put her there, because we know who we want. Before DeGette, our rep was the lovely Patricia Schroeder.

Ruby the Liberal

(26,664 posts)
5. What in the party platform are you in agreement with?
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 09:29 PM
Jul 2012

(Not that platforms mean anything).

We know where you stand on regulating the poor bankers. So what drives you to vote with Democrats?

 

banned from Kos

(4,017 posts)
9. hilarious - I am
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 09:37 PM
Jul 2012

pro choice
pro gay marriage
pro drugs
secular
pro ACLU
anti war
pro Dodd-Frank (bank regs to you)
pro environment
pro alternate energy
pro ESCR
pro science
pro education
pro labor
pro union
pro education
anti school voucher
pro contraception
pro national Health care
pro gun (2nd Amendment)
pro free trade
pro stimulus
pro Obama


A LIBERAL ALL THE WAY!

Ruby the Liberal

(26,664 posts)
13. It wasn't meant to be hilarious.
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 09:44 PM
Jul 2012

You have been asked before, by many others. Glad you are addressing it.

 

banned from Kos

(4,017 posts)
14. Now I am glad you asked!
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 09:48 PM
Jul 2012

I am an old fashioned pro-market liberal.

But, you are right. I don't think I have confessed my positions here.

 

Panasonic

(2,921 posts)
21. Can one be pro-gun and be pro-gun control?
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 10:31 PM
Jul 2012

At least sane people who uses guns responsibly.

sarisataka

(22,694 posts)
36. I like to think I am
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 10:55 PM
Jul 2012

mostly sane.

I learned a new term tonight "Rolling domestic"
We called 911 because we saw a vehicle swerving and it appeared the male driver was hitting a female passenger in the back seat. The police caught up with them and found out the true story.
They are a couple who is engaged, from a culture that does not allow any physical touching before marriage. They were playing a tickling game as they were away from the supervision of their elders.
At no time did I consider confronting them at any stop, even though I was armed at the time. We followed at a reasonable ditance until the police could catch up.

End result was a little embarrassment for all and the police wished them a very happy wedding on our behalf.

dsc

(53,395 posts)
7. I think that in the Senate we should at least institute the rule
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 09:33 PM
Jul 2012

that you can't be chair, or ranking member, of a committee if you don't vote with the party all procedural votes which would have made passing health care reform vastly easier.

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
11. he is replying to a thread that quite rightly said no true Democrat
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 09:39 PM
Jul 2012

would favor slashing social security, but apparently is too scared to debate the matter directly.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
29. Depends on how you define "markets" and "capitalism"
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 10:37 PM
Jul 2012

You say you are "pro-free trade," and that you are "pro-labor / pro-union."

Unless you're working under some oddball definition of "free trade," different from the one in common usage, you really can't be both.

 

banned from Kos

(4,017 posts)
33. Good question. Like Krugman I am pro free trade (meaning anti-tariff)
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 10:52 PM
Jul 2012

If Labor wants input on auto quotas then I am pro-labor. There is a reason "free trade" agreements take years to negotiate.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
32. you're probably one of the very, very few Democrats that would mislead about Glass Steagall
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 10:50 PM
Jul 2012

and do so in a way to discourage people from reinstating its strongest measures.

and by the way, that position you hold --it's anti market. what the banks were allowed to do hurt the market more than almost anything thrown at them in decades.

not a pro-market capitalism position. it led to bailouts, government expenditures to help the unemployed with things their former jobs providing prior to it.

 

banned from Kos

(4,017 posts)
35. No, I am pro Dodd Frank which is much stronger than Glass Steagall ever was
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 10:54 PM
Jul 2012

I want the strongest regs.

Glass Steagall failed us.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
44. there you go again with the trickery about Glass Steagall
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 11:12 PM
Jul 2012

you're brazen about it too.

you complained about Glass Steagall after it was gutted, saying the weakened version wasn't strong enough.

but you tried to conflate the strong Glass Steagall that existed before it was weakened --which was effective.

comparing what was left of Glass Steagall after most of it was repealed to Dodd Frank is something you know is misleading.

yet you seem determined to convince people of something false just to win the argument.

one thing is for sure, this type of obfuscation is the type that lobbyists have perfected when dealing with the public.

and that my friend, is a talent one can be paid handsomely for doing.

 

Guy Whitey Corngood

(26,848 posts)
58. This is a pattern. Make some idiotic remark. Then when people ask
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 01:28 PM
Jul 2012

for proof or debunk what was said. He gets real quiet all of a sudden.

 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
48. You have to help me out on this.
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 11:26 PM
Jul 2012

How could Glass Steagall fail us if it was repealed in the late 90s? Much of the corruption and implosion on wall street is directly linked to the repeal of Glass Steagall.

Ruby the Liberal

(26,664 posts)
49. So why are Sandy Weill and friends lining up to reinstate it?
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 11:32 PM
Jul 2012

Weill was the push behind Phil Gramm because Citi wanted to buy his Traveler's group.

Or did you miss that news last week?

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
16. You just proved that you really don't get it.
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 09:51 PM
Jul 2012

In your mind, "Dem" is just the party, so your reasons for voting for "it" don't matter.

To many of us, it is the philosophy and morality behind the label, AND ONLY THAT, that gives it any meaning.

On edit, I also want to add that it is a very stupid comparison. People are BORN American, it is not something (usually) they choose, unlike a party which you choose to suit your beliefs. Dumb analogy indeed!

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
18. Right. Thanks to Blue Dogs, we got a private insurance law rather than HCR.
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 10:01 PM
Jul 2012

Sure, it's nice to have the Majority, but it's what you do with it that counts.

Selatius

(20,441 posts)
27. Folks like Ben Nelson and Max Baucus wouldn't have voted for a Public Option.
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 10:35 PM
Jul 2012

That's considered too far to the left. Plus, it would've been far easier not to challenge such a wealthy lobby in the run-up to a mid-term election year.

We basically got Romneycare except at the national level.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
23. No true Democrat would be offended by the term True Democrat.
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 10:32 PM
Jul 2012

Only those squishy middle-liner conservative blue dogs would be.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
30. Actually, the problem is that those two always thought they were doing us the favor
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 10:42 PM
Jul 2012

But let's just be clear how much we let those two jokers water-down our health care law.

Did we get their vote on it later? Yeah, after giving them what they wanted. She wanted, demanded to kill the public option --something that would've helped us on the legal front and would've helped us deal with states opting out of Medicaid expansion --see there are complications with the legislation on the exchanges where states don't participate. public option would've been a way to deal with that --another tool. Blanche killed it and lost her election anyway.

Honestly, those two jokers, had they left the health care bill alone, voted for it and lost their elections, would've done more for us than they did when we allowed them to weaken it.

Instead they weakened Obama's principal accomplishment and made the party look weak, made themselves look like vascillators and harmed the law in a way that makes it harder for the public to see results.

They hurt us. You know someone finally read them the riot act and they got on board, but by then the damage was done.

Nobody tells me that they are doing me a favor by being a Democrat when they hold progressive legislation hostage for something worse and support Republican ideas that are un-progressive, but want credit for supporting fewer bad ideas.

There is no soul in being a centrist anymore.

pinboy3niner

(53,339 posts)
56. Yeah...
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 04:22 AM
Jul 2012

...I was kinda hoping for an answer FROM THE OP, that might better explain his objections to Manny's thread.

white_wolf

(6,257 posts)
50. I tend to think of anyone who cuts social security as...
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 11:36 PM
Jul 2012

a corporatist sellout and any progressive party would do well to kick them to the curve.

DJ13

(23,671 posts)
41. If you're holding up Blanche Lincoln & Ben Nelson as role models
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 11:01 PM
Jul 2012

You have already lost the argument.

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
46. I suggest you get used to it, or get over it. Centrist "Reagan" Democrats
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 11:15 PM
Jul 2012

helped ruin the country and the Democratic Party by getting Reagan elected, then, to top it off, started the DLC.

And things haven't changed all that much. The country is a total mess, and this mess is totally the fault of pro market Blue Dogs and republicans.

The trash Blue Dogs carry is well earned.




99Forever

(14,524 posts)
47. Maybe if Dem Party leadership...
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 11:15 PM
Jul 2012

.. as much time and energy keeping Nelson and Lincoln in line, as they do browbeating rank and file members for being VERY disappointed with their crappy track record in doing for THE PEOPLE, they might not have such a crappy track record.

 

MotherPetrie

(3,145 posts)
52. If they echo Repug talking points, they are DINO's -- and fucking traitors who may as well be Repugs
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 12:52 AM
Jul 2012

And in my my book that ain't a REAL Democrat.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
54. Why do you find it offensive? I have no problem with it. You can call me a true Democrat anytime
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 02:02 AM
Jul 2012

and I will be proud to admit it. Can't imagine why any Democrat would find it offensive.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I find the term "tru...