Informative NYT editorial on Trump and renewed prospects for the Equal Rights Amendment
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/19/opinion/a-rebuke-to-trump-a-century-in-the-making.html?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=opinion-c-col-left-region®ion=opinion-c-col-left-region&WT.nav=opinion-c-col-left-region
Having a sexist in the Oval Office who curries favor with conservative religious groups is having dire consequences. Health workers in developing nations are preparing for a rise in unsafe abortions due to President Trumps reinstatement of the global gag rule that prohibits federal funding of groups that provide abortion services or referrals. Here at home, his administration has been hostile not only to abortion access, but even to birth control.
But Mr. Trumps presidency is also having some effects he probably doesnt intend. Rage at the election of a man who boasted about grabbing womens genitals helped set off the #MeToo movements reckoning with sexual misconduct. A record number of women are running for office around the country, many of them announcing their candidacies after participating in womens marches the day after Mr. Trumps inauguration.
And now, on Mr. Trumps watch, feminists could reach a goal nearly a century in the making, and that many assumed would never come to pass ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment to the Constitution. It states: Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.
The fight centers on Illinois, where the State Senate recently passed a bill to ratify the E.R.A. If the State House of Representatives also passes the legislation supporters hope to see a vote next month, and are cautiously optimistic about the outcome then Illinois will become the 37th state to ratify the amendment.
...
There are some questions about what will happen if a 38th state ratifies the amendment, given that it would miss the deadline Congress set by at least 36 years, and five states have even voted to rescind their ratifications. But E.R.A. supporters and some legal experts make a plausible case that the amendment should still be recognized, pointing to, among other things, the 27th Amendment, on congressional pay, which was ratified more than 200 years after its passage by Congress, although no deadline had been set.
... more