Louise Mensch: Questions on RICO not included cause indicted already in NY

[triron]

Link to tweet

Link to tweet

[JoeOtterbein]

1. That is interesting. n/t

[triron]

2. Also this:

Link to tweet

[Callado119]

3. Doubt it

Unfortunately I doubt this is true. She has been saying this for a year and there has been zero corroboration about an existing trump indictment from any other even remotely credible sources. She definitely has major credibility issues; although, we are likely to hear more about Trump money laundering at some point just going by publicly available information.

[brooklynite]

4. Everyone knows a Presidential indictment requires filing with the Marshal of the Supreme Court.....

[triron]

5. I don't.

Anyway there's this:

&quot 4) Sealed Indictment. The magistrate judge to whom an indictment is returned may direct that the indictment be kept secret until the defendant is in custody or has been released pending trial. The clerk must then seal the indictment, and no person may disclose the indictment's existence except as necessary to issue or execute a warrant or summons."

from https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_6

Note that is says "no person may disclose the Indictment's existence..."

so how could it be filed as you are suggesting?

[grantcart]

12. Mensch had previously reported that this had already been done

[pnwmom]

9. What if he were indicted during the transition? n/t

[Dr Hobbitstein]

10. .

[Me.]

6. KR

I thought there was something when I heard the questions

[onenote]

7. Nonsense. Pure nonsense.

[PSPS]

8. LOL. Louise Mensch

[Dr Hobbitstein]

11. Louise Mensch: Making up bullshit and selling it to the gullible. nt

[elias7]

16. I know you've closed the book on her

but perhaps you take another look at patribotics blog for the past year and see how much she has reported is coming to fruition. She has multiple IC sources...

[Dr Hobbitstein]

18. Nothing has come to fruition.

She has no sources. She lies. Over and over and over.

She was right once, 2 years ago.

https://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2017/10/youre-not-mad-at-facebook-youre-mad-at-america.html

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/dispatches/2017/08/30/reliable-sources-louise-mensch-claude-taylor/

https://www.vox.com/world/2017/5/19/15561842/trump-russia-louise-mensch

[melman]

13. Totally made up

Mensch just sits in her NYC mansion tweeting made up nonsense all day. I can't even begin to understand how someone would see her as credible.

[manor321]

14. Stop quoting this idiot Mensch

She's a complete idiot.

[oberliner]

15. Louise Mensch?

[OnDoutside]

17. It's not outlandish to suggest this, bearing in mind two things

Firstly, Mueller would have had Trump's tax returns from early on in his investigation, Deutsche Bank records and other fact based evidence.

Secondly, he similarly had Manafort filleted based on money laundering charges.

Mueller would have access to all the evidence he would have needed to have a Grand Jury indictment on Trump.