Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

TheMastersNemesis

(10,602 posts) Tue May 1, 2018, 06:54 AM May 2018

Agree With Bill Press. House Does NOT Need A Chaplain. Separation of Church & State.

There is no need for prayer in a public institution and is supposed to be non religious.

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Agree With Bill Press. House Does NOT Need A Chaplain. Separation of Church & State. (Original Post) TheMastersNemesis May 2018 OP

I see no problem with a chaplain Sherman A1 May 2018 #1

Kind Of Wishful Thinking There, Sherm ProfessorGAC May 2018 #2

Perhaps Sherman A1 May 2018 #3

Waste of money on congressmen who have no ears to hear. Nt lostnfound May 2018 #4

Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)

1. I see no problem with a chaplain

Reply to TheMastersNemesis (Original post)

Tue May 1, 2018, 07:24 AM

May 2018

In the House or Senate. While I am not a religious type, perhaps if the current regime would listen to the words that are spoken by the chaplain, we might all be better off.