Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe leaker-in-chief is at it again
Robert Muellers former assistant explains how grammar errors prove leaked questions came from Trump
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/05/robert-muellers-former-assistant-explains-grammar-errors-prove-leaked-questions-came-trump/#.WuhFnA5D678.twitter
A former special assistant to Robert Mueller doesnt believe for a second that the leaked questions came from the special counsel or that those are the questions hell ask.
It was revealed Monday that there are 40 questions that Mueller will ask President Donald Trump about the ongoing investigations. The New York Times reported that someone outside of Trumps legal team leaked the questions. However, Michael Zeldin, who now works as a legal analyst for CNN, told New Day that he doesnt believe these questions came from Mueller.
We have, this morning, been calling these questions that Mueller propounded, but I dont believe that thats actually what these are, he began. I think these are notes taken by the recipients of a conversation with Muellers office where he outlined broad topics and these guys wrote down questions that they thought these topics may raise.
He explained that the way the questions are written make it pretty obvious.
Because of the way these questions are written, Zeldin explained his methodology. Lawyers wouldnt write questions this way, in my estimation. Some of the grammar is not even proper. So, I dont see this as a list of written questions that Muellers office gave to the president. I think these are more notes that the White House has taken and then they have expanded upon the conversation to write out these as questions.
It was revealed Monday that there are 40 questions that Mueller will ask President Donald Trump about the ongoing investigations. The New York Times reported that someone outside of Trumps legal team leaked the questions. However, Michael Zeldin, who now works as a legal analyst for CNN, told New Day that he doesnt believe these questions came from Mueller.
We have, this morning, been calling these questions that Mueller propounded, but I dont believe that thats actually what these are, he began. I think these are notes taken by the recipients of a conversation with Muellers office where he outlined broad topics and these guys wrote down questions that they thought these topics may raise.
He explained that the way the questions are written make it pretty obvious.
Because of the way these questions are written, Zeldin explained his methodology. Lawyers wouldnt write questions this way, in my estimation. Some of the grammar is not even proper. So, I dont see this as a list of written questions that Muellers office gave to the president. I think these are more notes that the White House has taken and then they have expanded upon the conversation to write out these as questions.
(end snip)
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1378 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The leaker-in-chief is at it again (Original Post)
deminks
May 2018
OP
Sounds like something Benedict Donald would do so he can wrongly say "nothing about collusion"
uponit7771
May 2018
#2
The NYT story itself says it came from a source outside the White House legal team, which insinuates it came from the White House. So this interpretation is expected given the story.
uponit7771
(90,336 posts)2. Sounds like something Benedict Donald would do so he can wrongly say "nothing about collusion"
... like he did in his tweet recently.
BSdetect
(8,998 posts)3. My impression was that those "questions" were loosely worded. Not legalistic in many cases.
B2G
(9,766 posts)4. So why isn't Mueller denying the questions came from his office?
Seems like a simple enough statement to make.
PJMcK
(22,035 posts)6. Even "No comment" is a comment (n/t)
MrModerate
(9,753 posts)5. In other words, the White House is lying about the questions . . .
Now that's a surprise.