Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,972 posts)
Tue May 1, 2018, 01:39 PM May 2018

Tax Cuts for the Top 1 Percent Cost More Than SNAP

he recently passed 2017 tax legislation, commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, provided a massive windfall to wealthy individuals and large corporations. According to estimates from the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, the richest 1 percent of households, those with incomes higher than $607,090, stand to receive a total tax cut of more than $84 billion in 2019 alone. To put this number in perspective, in 2019, the total cost of nutrition assistance benefits paid through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)—which will support 39 million individuals—is expected to be only $58 billion. SNAP is the nation’s largest food assistance program, helping 1 in 8 families—and 1 in 4 American children—afford to put food on the table. This means that the tax cuts to the top 1 percent alone could finance the entire SNAP program for nearly 1 1/2 years. What’s more, congressional Republican leaders have made it clear that they plan on partially paying for the 2017 tax law by cutting assistance programs that benefit families in need, as well as flagship programs—such as Medicare and Social Security—on which the middle class relies. The House majority is already moving to cut SNAP in its 2018 Farm Bill, which if passed, would cut nutrition assistance for more than 2 million people.

While the revenue generated from taxes on wealthy individuals does not directly pay for SNAP benefits, comparing the tax cuts for the top 1 percent with the relatively modest cost of providing nutrition to families in need highlights the misguided priorities of the current administration and congressional majority. As seen in Table 1, the SNAP program in nearly every state could be fully funded, and in many cases expanded, had this windfall gone to nutrition benefits instead of to the 1 percent in each state.



https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/economy/news/2018/05/01/450214/tax-cuts-top-1-percent-cost-snap/

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Tax Cuts for the Top 1 Percent Cost More Than SNAP (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2018 OP
Economic injustice? jalan48 May 2018 #1
Wouldn't want the wealthiest to starve! democratisphere May 2018 #2
Yeah, there's that. But also notice how Florida and Texas millionaires are making out like bandits. dawg May 2018 #3
And every Republican duforsure May 2018 #4

democratisphere

(17,235 posts)
2. Wouldn't want the wealthiest to starve!
Tue May 1, 2018, 01:44 PM
May 2018

What would they do if they couldn't gorge themselves with all the wealth and all the food.

dawg

(10,624 posts)
3. Yeah, there's that. But also notice how Florida and Texas millionaires are making out like bandits.
Tue May 1, 2018, 01:57 PM
May 2018

Meanwhile, New York 1%'ers get less money than those in my home state of Georgia. (And California, considering its size, doesn't do much better.)

duforsure

(11,885 posts)
4. And every Republican
Tue May 1, 2018, 02:26 PM
May 2018

because of their tax scam and con job all need to be voted out of office. They screwed us, and Nov. we have the chance to do to them what they've been doing to us.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Tax Cuts for the Top 1 Pe...