Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

phantom power

(25,966 posts)
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 01:26 PM Aug 2012

LaTourette: "“We’re talking about building roads and bridges for Christ’s sake."

(LaTourette) also singled out legislation he said used to sail through Congress “like a hot knife through butter”: the farm bill, a student loan rate extension and especially the transportation bill, which stalled in the House until a short-term extension was passed and used as the House position in a conference with the Senate.

“We’re talking about building roads and bridges for Christ’s sake. We’re not talking about big Democratic and Republican initiatives. ... I think [it is] an embarrassment to the House of Representatives,” he railed. “But more than being an embarrassment to the House of Representatives, it was indicative of the fact that people are more interested in fighting with each other than they are in getting the no-brainers done and governing.”

http://www.boomantribune.com/story/2012/8/1/105011/2149


You know what? Fuck you, LaTourette. You and your GOP pals spent 40 fucking years demagoguing about how "govt is the problem" and "low taxes are always the answer," and signing loyalty pledges to Grover Fucking Norquist, the McCarthy of Taxation.

And you won, you assholes. You won so big that now even Democrats are ambivalent on the idea that taxes and govt might be useful after all. So now millions of average voters and tea-party congresspeople are to rabidly anti-govt and anti-tax that yes, you can't fucking pass a bill to maintain roads or sewers, even when borrowing is basically free and we have 8% unemployment with people who would love to be put to work fixing all of our shit.

If that's a bitter pill for you LaTourette, well fuck you. You earned it.

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
LaTourette: "“We’re talking about building roads and bridges for Christ’s sake." (Original Post) phantom power Aug 2012 OP
I don't know much about his history but if he is standing up for what's right, more power to him! randome Aug 2012 #1
He's retiring, so he's not going to be allying against anybody in Congress. phantom power Aug 2012 #2
Hold the plaudits. I used to live in his district liberalhistorian Aug 2012 #15
This is what worries me (at least a little)... synapticwave Aug 2012 #18
Right, and we should applaud his action, and that of others, elleng Aug 2012 #19
LaTourette has been a moderate Republican in my dealings with him. bulloney Aug 2012 #21
He's just missing the hog call, is all. freshwest Aug 2012 #3
How many times did he vote with his republican buddies? liberal N proud Aug 2012 #4
So now the "roads and bridges" aren't for small business's sake KurtNYC Aug 2012 #5
He's disgusted with his party think4yourself Aug 2012 #6
I lack sympathy phantom power Aug 2012 #7
Or ... there's more $ to make as a lobbyist/corporate consultant Auggie Aug 2012 #12
Seems like he's burning bridges, if he's planning to hop the k-street gravy train phantom power Aug 2012 #13
The key words: "(not) constrained by ideological or ethical consistency" Auggie Aug 2012 #14
He should have fucking retired about liberalhistorian Aug 2012 #16
Gee, welcome to what progressives have been fighting against for decades ya idiot Downtown Hound Aug 2012 #8
Righteous rant. n/t lumberjack_jeff Aug 2012 #9
+1,000,000 ... Dems could take his district with a strong candidate. Auggie Aug 2012 #10
yes, short notice. Maybe Blue America could help phantom power Aug 2012 #11
And I have no doubt that the fucker liberalhistorian Aug 2012 #17
Agree Auggie Aug 2012 #22
He was a little too "blame the Democrats too" for my taste catbyte Aug 2012 #20
 

randome

(34,845 posts)
1. I don't know much about his history but if he is standing up for what's right, more power to him!
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 01:29 PM
Aug 2012

Soon we will have a common enemy to unite us. I really believe that.

Democrats and Republicans versus the Tea Party.

It's happening, bet on it!

phantom power

(25,966 posts)
2. He's retiring, so he's not going to be allying against anybody in Congress.
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 01:34 PM
Aug 2012

I don't know what he plans to do after retiring, if anything.

liberalhistorian

(20,904 posts)
15. Hold the plaudits. I used to live in his district
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 03:06 PM
Aug 2012

and he used to be one of those anti-government obstructionists he now oh-so-conveniently derides and deplores. Prior to being in Congress, he was my former county's prosecutor for several terms. During that time, he barely knew the meaning of "due process" and the law. Consequently, he had the dubious distinction of being the prosecutor in the state with the highest number of convictions overturned by the appeals and supreme court, largely because he WOULD NOT FOLLOW due process and the law. And this is the smallest county in the state, with eighty-eight other counties.

His big "claim to fame" that took him to congress was prosecuting Jeffrey Lundgren and members of his cult for the murders of the Avery family. Which in itself was no big accomplishment, because Lundgren, in addition to being a sociopathic nutball killer/cult leader, was a dumb fucker who left enough clues and evidence behind so that a kindergartner could have figured the case out. A fucking ham sandwich could have gotten that conviction.

And he was one of the hypocritical idiots who voted both to spend federal money on the investigation of Clinton, and to impeach Clinton for the whole Lewinsky horseshit, when, at the same time, he was screwing a lobbyist whom he then left his wife for. And he did it in such a disgusting way; he simply called his wife at their home in Ohio, from D.C., and said he was involved with someone else whom he was going to marry, and that he was divorcing her. When she, understandably distraught, asked him to at least consider counseling, he said he would and they'd talk later. A few days later, he called her up again and said, forget it, it's over, goodbye. He wouldn't even tell their minor children, the children she stayed behind to care for; he left it up to her to do his dirty work. The ink was barely dry on their divorce before he married the much-younger lobbyist bitch, who had appeared before him while he was on the committee dealing with her lobbying area, and he'd subsequently voted in favor of awarding money/contract to the firm she was lobbying for.

They'd been involved during that whole time, but he hadn't disclosed that relationship. But because he was a repub, he, of course, got away with it. The local republican rag didn't even print anything about it and shut down any letters or columns about it. But, of course, it was all over Clinton. What was especially hypocritical was that he was yammering on and on about how immoral Clinton was and a bad example and disgusting person, etc., demanding details from the Starr report, etc., etc. Yet, he'd get angry when anyone questioned him on his own domestic situation, saying it was, and I quote "a private matter, none of your business." FUCK. YOU., you hypocritical moron.

He was anti-gubmint before it was cool, yet he's spent almost his entire fucking useless career sucking from the taxpayer's teat.

synapticwave

(52 posts)
18. This is what worries me (at least a little)...
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 03:59 PM
Aug 2012

The republicans will come out as the "party in the center" and Dems and Tea baggers will be the left and right wing parties. It's actually a clever move by the repubs.

elleng

(141,926 posts)
19. Right, and we should applaud his action, and that of others,
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 03:59 PM
Aug 2012

who are either quitting due to repug intransigence, or who speak out against it.

I'm not going to read any more of this thread, cause can't stand to see Dems (DUers) who don't recognize a gift when we receive it.

Thanks, randome.

bulloney

(4,113 posts)
21. LaTourette has been a moderate Republican in my dealings with him.
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 04:10 PM
Aug 2012

Unlike some of these other goofs in the Ohio delegation, like Boehner, Jordan, Schmidt and the like, who just want to be obstructionists just because the President's party is not the same as theirs.

Funny how deficits didn't matter to these clowns when Bush was president.

KurtNYC

(14,549 posts)
5. So now the "roads and bridges" aren't for small business's sake
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 01:39 PM
Aug 2012

but rather for Christ's benefit ? (I kid)

It's like reverse psychology. If Obama says that roads and bridges are helpful then the Repubs start refusing to build them.

Obama: "Roads and bridges...you didn't build that."
GOP: "not anymore we won't."

phantom power

(25,966 posts)
13. Seems like he's burning bridges, if he's planning to hop the k-street gravy train
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 02:11 PM
Aug 2012

not that any of these guys are very constrained by ideological or ethical consistency.

Auggie

(33,147 posts)
14. The key words: "(not) constrained by ideological or ethical consistency"
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 02:43 PM
Aug 2012

All is forgotten and forgiven if enough money/power is at stake

liberalhistorian

(20,904 posts)
16. He should have fucking retired about
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 03:09 PM
Aug 2012

eight terms ago. I remember the night he won, I'd been working on the campaign of the Dem congressman he ousted. None of us could believe he'd won, and we knew what a disaster the idiot was going to be.

Auggie

(33,147 posts)
10. +1,000,000 ... Dems could take his district with a strong candidate.
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 02:02 PM
Aug 2012

I'm told by friends in that district, unfortunately, that they've been caught with their pants down. LaTourette's resignation came unexpectedly.

liberalhistorian

(20,904 posts)
17. And I have no doubt that the fucker
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 03:10 PM
Aug 2012

did that on purpose, knowing exactly that the Dems wouldn't be prepared.

catbyte

(39,150 posts)
20. He was a little too "blame the Democrats too" for my taste
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 04:03 PM
Aug 2012

I saw excerpts on The Ed Show, Maddow & Last Word. It was OK, but he still blamed "radical Democrats" and he knows that's not true. The whole tit-for-tat meme is so annoying.

Diane
Anishinaabe in MI & mom to Taz, Nigel, and new baby brother Sammy, members of Dogs Against Romney, Cat Division
"Dogs Aren’t Luggage--HISS!”

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»LaTourette: "“We’re ...