General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis message was self-deleted by its author
This message was self-deleted by its author (goldenheart) on Tue May 15, 2018, 04:08 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.
SWBTATTReg
(26,257 posts)go out shopping, see how many of the stores and shops you shop in, are owned by billionaires and multi-millionaires. You would be shocked I think by how many businesses out there on main street are owned by these guys/gals.
I don't support this mega stores so I avoid shopping at them, period. I know my choices are limited but in my small way, I feel like I'm doing my part. This is including Amazon too. For one guy to have $130 Billion? How is this even remotely fair?
Wwcd
(6,288 posts)The Biggest Economic Problem You Aren't Hearing About
Monopolies are making life worse for the vast majority of us while enriching the very few.
Duh.
This is new news?
Reich is grasping if he believes no on has "heard about" this.
Wow.
LisaM
(29,634 posts)the long-term effects.
Look, lots of people have warned against Walmart and Amazon and the Koch Brothers (ever tried avoiding their products at the grocery store?) and a bunch of companies for years and frankly, consumers seem to care about nothing, nothing, but price and convenience. Even if it's just a few dollars! I support a very small indie bookstore and yes, I have to physically go in the door to shop there, but they know me and treat me well, and they'll even take my used books in trade, and I'd a million times rather spend a dollar or two more and wait a week or two for a books so that I can support the nice little cozy atmosphere and positive community presence they create than have a drone drop a book on my head two hours after I buy it.
I think a lot of people are dimly aware of monopolies, and yet they continue their consumer habits in ways that only benefit themselves and enrich these companies.
Wwcd
(6,288 posts)Congress passed the Sherman Antitrust Act almost unanimously in 1890.
LisaM
(29,634 posts)who use Amazon for almost everything? By default, they're supporting a monopoly and they don't care. It would be helpful if the press began to refer to them as such, and for the government to invoke some anti-trust legislation, but the fact is that I don't think people care. They like Prime and the ease of shopping there too much.
Wwcd
(6,288 posts)..deal with monopolies. Yup it was all in her platform.
Now Reich says its a big deal??
We had that chance, Reich was silent. Now we get to battle Trump's crappy economic policies instead.
Too little too late, Mr Reich.
LisaM
(29,634 posts)moondust
(21,286 posts)~
Since 2014, the price has continued to rise, and Acthar now costs more than $40,000 a vial a total increase of 100-thousand percent from its selling price of $40 a vial in 2001, according to the "60 Minutes" report.
~
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/07/mallinckrodt-shares-rebound-after-60-minutes-report-on-drug-prices.html
mia
(8,480 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)appalachiablue
(44,022 posts)Last edited Tue May 8, 2018, 03:26 PM - Edit history (1)
in the news, especially as such, "monopolies" likely due to the term's negative connotations and history.
Industry consolidation into one or several companies is very dangerous for the economy, workers, consumers and society. Monopolistic consolidation pools extreme wealth for the few at the top, and leaves many at the bottom struggling. Because they lack any competition monopolies are also able to jack up prices. Diversity and variety in business and many aspects of life are healthiest.
IF people even know what the term monopoly means, some think it was only in practice long ago, way back in the robber baron age of Carnegie, Rockefeller and JP Morgan as Reich says. Big mistake.
Since the 1980s monopolies and duopolies exist now in many industries in the US as Reich states- only 4-5 major banks, same with consolidated media giants, big Ag, consumer goods, pharma, retail, airlines, more. Major conglomerates like Unilever control household consumer products from dish soap and diapers to batteries and mouthwash. Companies enlarge and become more profitable through take overs, mergers (M & As), buyouts and putting other companies out of business. ~ The Big Fish Eat the Little Fish ~
Media conglomerates, mostly conservative and owned by the very wealthy must be re-regulated and broken up by renewing the discarded 1949 Fairness Doctrine and the early 1900s Sherman Anti Trust Act that Reich talks about in the video. A balanced media with many choices and outlets is critical to having an informed and learned public in a functioning democracy, as stated in the US Constitution. This is the very reason why specific groups esp. anti democratic and authoritarian want and have control of all media- from Nazi propaganda minister Goebbels in 1930s- 40s Germany, to USSR, governments in Latin America, all over the globe.



*"Accuse the other side of that which you are guilty. ~ Always tell the biggest lie and use it over and over."* Jos. Goebbels
Wednesdays
(22,602 posts)For example, Columbia Pictures (now owned by Sony) was once part of the Coca-Cola Empire.
Disney owning ESPN. And so on.
appalachiablue
(44,022 posts)Media & movie/entertainment empires like Disney enlarging for decades. All's a mess but beneficial for some.
That consumer Chart is only of major household product corps. It used to clearly show sub-brands. But I now see the graphic has been blurred to obscure the smaller co. names when copying and pasting.

US airline consolidation.
PaulX2
(2,032 posts)We are being screwed.
Now don't talk about pills pricing.
IronLionZion
(51,268 posts)there is an illusion of having lots of choices. But in reality we could have lots of different brands with the profits rolling up to one or two parent companies. And they have tremendous pricing power and they use it.
What else are we going to do? Buy organic? Many of the organic products at the natural foods store with independent looking packaging are actually owned by massive conglomerates.
Don't get me started on fraudulent farmers markets selling imported produce gassed with ethelene. I hope no millennials actually believe oranges and bananas and kiwis are locally grown in the Northern US
aggiesal
(10,804 posts)This has got to be in the 90's
They own ever part of distribution for eye-wear.
Just ask Oakley about Luxottica, and they might have nightmares.
I like Oakley eye-wear, so did a lot of other people.
You could find them in Sunglass hut, PearlVision, LensCrafters, ...
Luxottica wanted to buy the Oakley brand, but Oakley wouldn't sell.
So Luxottica just stopped allowing Oakley glasses in they eye-wear
retail centers. Oakley plummeted until they had no choice but to sell
to Luxottica, which then proceeded to stop making some of the more
popular eye-wear styles.
They own retail:
Sunglass Hut International
Apex by Sunglass Hut
LensCrafters
Pearle Vision
Sears Optical
Target Optical
OPSM
ILORI
EyeMed Vision Care
Optical Shop of Aspen
Laubman & Pank
GMO
Oliver Peoples
Alain Mikli
Oakley
David Clulow
Glasses.com
Econópticas
Salmoiraghi e Viganò
They own eye-wear brands:
Alain Mikli
Arnette
Eye Safety Systems (ESS)
Oakley
Oliver Peoples
Persol
Ray-Ban
Sferoflex
Vogue Eyewear
The company also makes eyewear under license for the following designer labels:
Giorgio Armani
Brooks Brothers
Bulgari
Burberry
Chanel
Coach
Dolce & Gabbana
DKNY
Michael Kors
Miu Miu
Polo Ralph Lauren
Paul Smith Spectacles
Prada
Ralph Lauren
Starck Eyes
Tiffany & Co.
Tory Burch
Valentino[31]
Versace