Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Proud liberal 80

(4,167 posts)
Tue May 8, 2018, 09:00 PM May 2018

Uranium one deal

Remember when Trump and his Deplorables were saying that the Uranium One deal was pay to play because the company bought a Canadian company in 2007. The Canadian company was once lead by a guy no longer at the company who donated to the Clinton Foundation (before Clinton was even Sec of State).

Then in 2010 the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, a committee of nine government cabinet Departments unanimously approved the deal. And Clinton wasn’t even part of decision.

I see like 5 degrees of separation, but somehow that was pay to play. But Donald Trump’s lawyer receiving money from ATT isn’t?

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Uranium one deal (Original Post) Proud liberal 80 May 2018 OP
Not his lawyer. A shell company that made payments that Donnie personally benefitted from. unblock May 2018 #1
So, what is this about att and pay to play? WhiteTara May 2018 #2

unblock

(52,196 posts)
1. Not his lawyer. A shell company that made payments that Donnie personally benefitted from.
Tue May 8, 2018, 09:09 PM
May 2018

Money in from corporations and Russians, money out to pay Donnie's sex partners to keep quiet.

And, the companies get governmental favors in return.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Uranium one deal