Hillary should have won. The N.Y. Times downplayed Trump's Espionage Investigation.

[UCmeNdc]

Before the election the N.Y. Times reporting was false.

[bettyellen]

1. They made decisions about reporting based on a guess HRC would win.... everyone did.

That’s not their job.

[DemoHack]

2. Yeah, Gore should have won too.

But that's the past - get tougher, learn from it, move on now.

[JI7]

4. no, it isn't the past because there are people still trying to do the same thing

and not enough is being done to help make sure this doesn't happen again.

unlike France .

[Cha]

6. I don't like it when anyone says..

"move on" when the same thing will happen again.. like it did with Gore, Kerry, and Hillary.

We will discuss it.. thank goodness there's a political discussion board to do that on. It's freaking cathartic.

[TheSmarterDog]

12. Move on ... ONCE WE FIX WHAT WAS BROKEN.

[Cha]

14. Yes, you can't

be flightly.

[LisaM]

3. Same with Al Gore.

Makes me so upset.

[Cha]

5. The NYT comes to the rescue of

the war machine and corporate billionaires again.

They were directly reasonable for the war on Iraq.. and now this trump monster has their finger prints on it, too.

[Alethia Merritt]

7. I was thinking the same thing.

Hillary not only won the popular vote she "slayed." When you think of all the forces fighting and working against her, and that 78,000 votes cast among three states (easily a number that could have been traded, lost, or mishandled) robbed her of the electoral votes you have to be amazed.

[Cha]

8. I was in extreme shock.. and

now I'm just kind of numb with alternate bouts of outrage. Resisting.

[tomp]

9. The NYT has always played political games.

always be suspicious of the NYT.

[oberliner]

10. NY Times ran articles about Hillary and Anthony Weiner emails a week before the election

[uponit7771]

13. +1

[Martin Eden]

11. Damn Liberal Media!

Double standards favoring the likes of Dim Son and Dotard Don.