Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts)
Thu May 17, 2018, 08:40 AM May 2018

Via David Corn: Avenatti "vetting two other women who claim they signed NDAs and got hush money"

David Corn
?
Verified account

@DavidCornDC

.@MichaelAvenatti just said on MSNBC that he's vetting two other women who claim they signed NDAs and got hush money payments from Trump after having affairs with him. "May create additional exposure," he says. #BigWhoaIfTrue

5:32 AM - 17 May 2018


14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Via David Corn: Avenatti "vetting two other women who claim they signed NDAs and got hush money" (Original Post) Miles Archer May 2018 OP
I watched that on 'Morning Joe'. Mika asked him if they were going to go public... PearliePoo2 May 2018 #1
I'll say it again: superpatriotman May 2018 #2
OK, here it is azureblue May 2018 #9
Exactly. IluvPitties May 2018 #12
AWWWWW YEAH BABY! manor321 May 2018 #3
Kick and Rec. Kingofalldems May 2018 #4
I wonder how many times Trump's story will change NewJeffCT May 2018 #5
If that is true, then Trump violated disclosure rules on his financial statement. Frustratedlady May 2018 #6
Last year he tried t submit an unsigned financial statement malaise May 2018 #10
K&R hwmnbn May 2018 #7
His base doesn't care if there are more women mainstreetonce May 2018 #8
Deep, deep, deep is the republican sleaze and skuzz Achilleaze May 2018 #11
I still want the tax returns to tell us all the big story. calimary May 2018 #13
vetting is important. There will be a number of fake tapes, fake claims, forged reports, etc to wiggs May 2018 #14

PearliePoo2

(7,768 posts)
1. I watched that on 'Morning Joe'. Mika asked him if they were going to go public...
Thu May 17, 2018, 08:43 AM
May 2018

He said it would be up to them. It's a difficult decision to make for obvious reasons.

Frustratedlady

(16,254 posts)
6. If that is true, then Trump violated disclosure rules on his financial statement.
Thu May 17, 2018, 09:09 AM
May 2018

So far, he has one racked up. Max. sentence is 5 years.

How many more will he have to amend?

Truth be known, most of us figure there are many more in that vast list of assets/liabilities. He can't even tell the truth in numbers.

mainstreetonce

(4,178 posts)
8. His base doesn't care if there are more women
Thu May 17, 2018, 09:35 AM
May 2018

But will they care if other women were threatened ?

Possibilities that could matter
Hookers
Porn stars
Celebrites
Campaign workers
Wives of staff or campaign workers
Russian diplomats

Achilleaze

(15,543 posts)
11. Deep, deep, deep is the republican sleaze and skuzz
Thu May 17, 2018, 10:04 AM
May 2018

degenerate republican "values" are toxic to everything good and holy about America.

calimary

(81,210 posts)
13. I still want the tax returns to tell us all the big story.
Thu May 17, 2018, 10:20 AM
May 2018

I can’t help but suspect that this is a key reason why trump desperately clings to the secrecy of those tax returns. It would be most illuminating to see how this is reflected in the returns. Legal fees? Political contributions? How much?

Since they’ve been kept so secret for so long, I can’t help but suspect that there’s real, and highly incriminating evidence therein. Or some genuine embarrassment as to how much he’s really worth. And/or MUCH MUCH more.

wiggs

(7,811 posts)
14. vetting is important. There will be a number of fake tapes, fake claims, forged reports, etc to
Thu May 17, 2018, 10:43 AM
May 2018

try to delegitimize the real ones.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Via David Corn: Avenatti ...