General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNotorious 'progressive' anti-Hillary conspiracy blogger has pivoted to pro-gun and 'Trump 2020'
Goodman has since changed his tune. He now has a pro-Second Amendment YouTube channel and is now openly supporting Trumps 2020 re-election bid on his Twitter account.
==============
Goodman pushed the scandal about Hillary Clintons emails, the debunked conspiracy theory about a uranium deal and even Benghazi. He wrote that Hillary Clinton was certain to be indicted for deleting her emails, and that she should therefore concede to Bernie. After Bernie lost to Clinton, Goodman urged Bernie to contest the Democratic convention and then, finally, urged fellow die-hard Berners to vote for Jill Stein.
Now, while he calls himself a former liberal on his Second Amendment channel, Goodman is arguing to fellow progressive followers that the Mueller investigation is bunk.
[link:https://www.rawstory.com/2018/05/notorious-progressive-anti-hillary-blogger-now-pivoted-pro-gun-trump-2020/|
Heh....this is what white male privilege can look like
Croney
(4,657 posts)JI7
(89,244 posts)Ferrets are Cool
(21,105 posts)stonecutter357
(12,694 posts)Mike Nelson
(9,950 posts)...looks, to me, like he's been playing the same tune all along...
DanTex
(20,709 posts)OneBro
(1,159 posts)Thus leaving them vulnerable to a repeat in coming elections.
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)Captain Stern
(2,201 posts)Just kidding, of course....but it's really not that much of a reach.
betsuni
(25,447 posts)Now it all makes sense.
Mc Mike
(9,111 posts)But I do recall how Jimmy Dore was pretending to be a 'fighting lefty', then switched over to openly backing dRump.
Cenk's refusal to address that made me swear off TYT, though I love Ana.
RandiFan1290
(6,229 posts)I never listened to this moron and it dosen't surprise me that trump's pals at msnbc and cnn propped him up.
DU is jam packed with trolls pretending to be Democrats.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)and soft. Little Lord HaHa needs to lay off the white bread and mayonnaise sandwiches before bed methinks.
c-rational
(2,590 posts)Mrs. Ted Nancy
(462 posts)Oneironaut
(5,491 posts)They were neither left or right, and definitely weren't Liberals or Progressives. That's not to say that all Bernie supporters were extreme Libertarians, but a lot were. That explains why many shifted to supporting Trump when Bernie lost the primary.
They didn't care for the typical Democratic platform. I think many were previously Ron Paul supporters.
Me.
(35,454 posts)by supporters of the Senator and God Forbid a voice be raised against him
nini
(16,672 posts)It woukd be funny but it's not.
and the blinders are still on
dalton99a
(81,426 posts)for fear of knowing the truth
ismnotwasm
(41,974 posts)Even if its Rawstory? This is not exactly new and he was clearly full of shit throughout the primaries, I have better writing talent, and Im not a writer. Fuck this guy. I will never understand why anyone listened to him in the first place.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Which is funny because haha doesn't look like a hippie.
ismnotwasm
(41,974 posts)His crap was so completely ridiculous during the primaries I still cant get over people taking him serious. Then again, millions of people voted for Trump, so critical thinking is purely missing in large swaths of our population
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)Not anymore.
ismnotwasm
(41,974 posts)Sigh. You are right. I even had people in RL thinking he was legit. Just UGHgives me a headache.
Kirk Lover
(3,608 posts)Stallion
(6,474 posts)they created him and gave him a platform
Here's his HuffPo Profile page
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/author/h-a-goodman
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)Inside man pretending to be one. Supported Sanders was his job inorder to bring division.
honest.abe
(8,650 posts)now realize they had been duped. An mea culpa to DU members would be appreciated.
MineralMan
(146,282 posts)For that, they were harshly criticized right here on DU, by people who, oddly enough, are no longer here.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)from 2015 and 2016.
He had so many fooled.
Thankfully, there were just as many who knew he was a doofus from day 1.
Sid
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,659 posts)I don't know why liberal-leaning publications used his stuff; it was so apparent where he was coming from.
Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)And "former liberal/progressive" my ass.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Orwell talked about the instability and transference of nationalistic political allegiances. Ive often said that the anti-Democratic party bent of some self-proclaimed progressives has a ver nationalistic feel , specifically what Orwell in this same piece called negative nationalism:
Instability. The intensity with which they are held does not prevent nationalist loyalties from being transferable. To begin with, as I have pointed out already, they can be and often are fastened up on some foreign country. One quite commonly finds that great national leaders, or the founders of nationalist movements, do not even belong to the country they have glorified. Sometimes they are outright foreigners, or more often they come from peripheral areas where nationality is doubtful. Examples are Stalin, Hitler, Napoleon, de Valera, Disraeli, Poincare, Beaverbrook. The Pan-German movement was in part the creation of an Englishman, Houston Chamberlain. For the past fifty or a hundred years, transferred nationalism has been a common phenomenon among literary intellectuals. With Lafcadio Hearne the transference was to Japan, with Carlyle and many others of his time to Germany, and in our own age it is usually to Russia. But the peculiarly interesting fact is that re-transference is also possible. A country or other unit which has been worshipped for years may suddenly become detestable, and some other object of affection may take its place with almost no interval. In the first version of H. G. Wells's Outline of History, and others of his writings about that time, one finds the United States praised almost as extravagantly as Russia is praised by Communists today: yet within a few years this uncritical admiration had turned into hostility. The bigoted Communist who changes in a space of weeks, or even days, into an equally bigoted Trotskyist is a common spectacle. In continental Europe Fascist movements were largely recruited from among Communists, and the opposite process may well happen within the next few years. What remains constant in the nationalist is his state of mind: the object of his feelings is changeable, and may be imaginary.
But for an intellectual, transference has an important function which I have already mentioned shortly in connection with Chesterton. It makes it possible for him to be much more nationalistic more vulgar, more silly, more malignant, more dishonest that he could ever be on behalf of his native country, or any unit of which he had real knowledge. When one sees the slavish or boastful rubbish that is written about Stalin, the Red Army, etc. by fairly intelligent and sensitive people, one realises that this is only possible because some kind of dislocation has taken place. In societies such as ours, it is unusual for anyone describable as an intellectual to feel a very deep attachment to his own country. Public opinion that is, the section of public opinion of which he as an intellectual is aware will not allow him to do so. Most of the people surrounding him are sceptical and disaffected, and he may adopt the same attitude from imitativeness or sheer cowardice: in that case he will have abandoned the form of nationalism that lies nearest to hand without getting any closer to a genuinely internationalist outlook. He still feels the need for a Fatherland, and it is natural to look for one somewhere abroad. Having found it, he can wallow unrestrainedly in exactly those emotions from which he believes that he has emancipated himself. God, the King, the Empire, the Union Jack all the overthrown idols can reappear under different names, and because they are not recognised for what they are they can be worshipped with a good conscience. Transferred nationalism, like the use of scapegoats, is a way of attaining salvation without altering one's conduct.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(107,855 posts)The first was Glenn Greenwald.
dalton99a
(81,426 posts)JI7
(89,244 posts)Turbineguy
(37,312 posts)It's where the money is.
Anybody think this POS can hold a real job?