Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Soph0571

(9,685 posts)
Sun May 20, 2018, 06:45 AM May 2018

Notorious 'progressive' anti-Hillary conspiracy blogger has pivoted to pro-gun and 'Trump 2020'



He was described by The Washington Post as “the unofficial scribe of Sanders’s most hardcore voters” and he was invited on CNN and MSNBC to advocate for Bernie Sanders.

Goodman has since changed his tune. He now has a pro-Second Amendment YouTube channel and is now openly supporting Trump’s 2020 re-election bid on his Twitter account.
==============

Goodman pushed the scandal about Hillary Clinton’s emails, the debunked conspiracy theory about a uranium deal and even Benghazi. He wrote that Hillary Clinton was certain to be indicted for deleting her emails, and that she should therefore concede to Bernie. After Bernie lost to Clinton, Goodman urged Bernie to contest the Democratic convention and then, finally, urged fellow die-hard Berners to vote for Jill Stein.

Now, while he calls himself a “former liberal” on his Second Amendment channel, Goodman is arguing to fellow “progressive” followers that the Mueller investigation is bunk.


[link:https://www.rawstory.com/2018/05/notorious-progressive-anti-hillary-blogger-now-pivoted-pro-gun-trump-2020/|

Heh....this is what white male privilege can look like
43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Notorious 'progressive' anti-Hillary conspiracy blogger has pivoted to pro-gun and 'Trump 2020' (Original Post) Soph0571 May 2018 OP
Pardon me while I scrape him off my shoe. Croney May 2018 #1
he was always a right wing piece of shit and never progressive JI7 May 2018 #2
True that. yardwork May 2018 #6
Yup EffieBlack May 2018 #17
Ding Ding. You nailed that one. Ferrets are Cool May 2018 #38
H.A. Goodman #1 BBRO ! stonecutter357 May 2018 #3
Goodman has since changed his tune? Mike Nelson May 2018 #4
I remember when this guy was the #1 hero of all the Hillary haters here. DanTex May 2018 #5
My fear is that progressives won't accept that they were duped. OneBro May 2018 #7
Reminds me of some other folk .. EffieBlack May 2018 #18
What was his username here? Captain Stern May 2018 #8
I had no idea what he looked like. betsuni May 2018 #9
I backed Bernie in the primary, and never heard of this butthole. Mc Mike May 2018 #10
I still proudly support Bernie RandiFan1290 May 2018 #11
White Male Privilege looks a little doughy Codeine May 2018 #12
That made me lol. c-rational May 2018 #13
Stay Puft marshmallow man. nt Mrs. Ted Nancy May 2018 #22
A lot of Bernie supporters were extreme Libertarians. Oneironaut May 2018 #14
+1 dalton99a May 2018 #20
And Yet He Was Featured Here On DU Me. May 2018 #15
It boggles the mind how many were played like a fiddle by these types nini May 2018 #16
Quite Right Me. May 2018 #19
They want to keep them on dalton99a May 2018 #21
How the fuck did that asshole get in the news? ismnotwasm May 2018 #23
Calling out haha and other fake-left wingnuts was "hippie punching." ucrdem May 2018 #24
He looks like the opportunistic little putz he is ismnotwasm May 2018 #28
He was all over Huffington Post. yallerdawg May 2018 #27
Oh yeah ismnotwasm May 2018 #31
He is an opportunist that capitalized. That is all. Kirk Lover May 2018 #25
The Huffington Post Should Take a Lot of the Blame Stallion May 2018 #26
He was never a "progressive" Iliyah May 2018 #29
I hope those who posted articles from this guy back during the election.. honest.abe May 2018 #30
Some people spotted him long, long ago. MineralMan May 2018 #32
I've said it before, but it's great fun to read through some of the HA Goodman threads at DU... SidDithers May 2018 #33
He was obviously never a progressive. The Velveteen Ocelot May 2018 #34
Dude looks like he's never had a date in his life. Downtown Hound May 2018 #35
Orwell talked about transferring allegiances in his Notes on Nationalism stevenleser May 2018 #36
Second former Salon columnist that turned out to be a fake liberal Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2018 #37
+1 dalton99a May 2018 #39
although it was always obvious they were not liberals JI7 May 2018 #43
It's the smart move. Turbineguy May 2018 #40
I have seen Jimmy Dore's future... and it looks a lot like this clown's. John Fante May 2018 #41
goodman is an asshole Gothmog May 2018 #42

OneBro

(1,159 posts)
7. My fear is that progressives won't accept that they were duped.
Sun May 20, 2018, 09:13 AM
May 2018

Thus leaving them vulnerable to a repeat in coming elections.

Mc Mike

(9,111 posts)
10. I backed Bernie in the primary, and never heard of this butthole.
Sun May 20, 2018, 09:42 AM
May 2018

But I do recall how Jimmy Dore was pretending to be a 'fighting lefty', then switched over to openly backing dRump.

Cenk's refusal to address that made me swear off TYT, though I love Ana.

RandiFan1290

(6,229 posts)
11. I still proudly support Bernie
Sun May 20, 2018, 09:55 AM
May 2018

I never listened to this moron and it dosen't surprise me that trump's pals at msnbc and cnn propped him up.

DU is jam packed with trolls pretending to be Democrats.

 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
12. White Male Privilege looks a little doughy
Sun May 20, 2018, 09:59 AM
May 2018

and soft. Little Lord HaHa needs to lay off the white bread and mayonnaise sandwiches before bed methinks.

Oneironaut

(5,491 posts)
14. A lot of Bernie supporters were extreme Libertarians.
Sun May 20, 2018, 10:21 AM
May 2018

They were neither left or right, and definitely weren't Liberals or Progressives. That's not to say that all Bernie supporters were extreme Libertarians, but a lot were. That explains why many shifted to supporting Trump when Bernie lost the primary.

They didn't care for the typical Democratic platform. I think many were previously Ron Paul supporters.

Me.

(35,454 posts)
15. And Yet He Was Featured Here On DU
Sun May 20, 2018, 10:28 AM
May 2018

by supporters of the Senator and God Forbid a voice be raised against him

nini

(16,672 posts)
16. It boggles the mind how many were played like a fiddle by these types
Sun May 20, 2018, 10:31 AM
May 2018

It woukd be funny but it's not.

ismnotwasm

(41,974 posts)
23. How the fuck did that asshole get in the news?
Sun May 20, 2018, 11:06 AM
May 2018

Even if it’s Rawstory? This is not exactly new and he was clearly full of shit throughout the primaries, I have better writing talent, and I’m not a writer. Fuck this guy. I will never understand why anyone listened to him in the first place.

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
24. Calling out haha and other fake-left wingnuts was "hippie punching."
Sun May 20, 2018, 12:50 PM
May 2018

Which is funny because haha doesn't look like a hippie.



ismnotwasm

(41,974 posts)
28. He looks like the opportunistic little putz he is
Sun May 20, 2018, 01:05 PM
May 2018

His crap was so completely ridiculous during the primaries I still can’t get over people taking him serious. Then again, millions of people voted for Trump, so critical thinking is purely missing in large swaths of our population

ismnotwasm

(41,974 posts)
31. Oh yeah
Sun May 20, 2018, 01:08 PM
May 2018

Sigh. You are right. I even had people in RL thinking he was legit. Just UGH—gives me a headache.

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
29. He was never a "progressive"
Sun May 20, 2018, 01:05 PM
May 2018

Inside man pretending to be one. Supported Sanders was his job inorder to bring division.

honest.abe

(8,650 posts)
30. I hope those who posted articles from this guy back during the election..
Sun May 20, 2018, 01:06 PM
May 2018

now realize they had been duped. An mea culpa to DU members would be appreciated.

MineralMan

(146,282 posts)
32. Some people spotted him long, long ago.
Sun May 20, 2018, 01:12 PM
May 2018

For that, they were harshly criticized right here on DU, by people who, oddly enough, are no longer here.

SidDithers

(44,228 posts)
33. I've said it before, but it's great fun to read through some of the HA Goodman threads at DU...
Sun May 20, 2018, 01:14 PM
May 2018

from 2015 and 2016.

He had so many fooled.

Thankfully, there were just as many who knew he was a doofus from day 1.

Sid

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,659 posts)
34. He was obviously never a progressive.
Sun May 20, 2018, 01:18 PM
May 2018

I don't know why liberal-leaning publications used his stuff; it was so apparent where he was coming from.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
36. Orwell talked about transferring allegiances in his Notes on Nationalism
Sun May 20, 2018, 01:26 PM
May 2018
http://orwell.ru/library/essays/nationalism/english/e_nat

Orwell talked about the instability and transference of nationalistic political allegiances. I’ve often said that the anti-Democratic party bent of some self-proclaimed progressives has a ver nationalistic feel , specifically what Orwell in this same piece called negative nationalism:

Instability. The intensity with which they are held does not prevent nationalist loyalties from being transferable. To begin with, as I have pointed out already, they can be and often are fastened up on some foreign country. One quite commonly finds that great national leaders, or the founders of nationalist movements, do not even belong to the country they have glorified. Sometimes they are outright foreigners, or more often they come from peripheral areas where nationality is doubtful. Examples are Stalin, Hitler, Napoleon, de Valera, Disraeli, Poincare, Beaverbrook. The Pan-German movement was in part the creation of an Englishman, Houston Chamberlain. For the past fifty or a hundred years, transferred nationalism has been a common phenomenon among literary intellectuals. With Lafcadio Hearne the transference was to Japan, with Carlyle and many others of his time to Germany, and in our own age it is usually to Russia. But the peculiarly interesting fact is that re-transference is also possible. A country or other unit which has been worshipped for years may suddenly become detestable, and some other object of affection may take its place with almost no interval. In the first version of H. G. Wells's Outline of History, and others of his writings about that time, one finds the United States praised almost as extravagantly as Russia is praised by Communists today: yet within a few years this uncritical admiration had turned into hostility. The bigoted Communist who changes in a space of weeks, or even days, into an equally bigoted Trotskyist is a common spectacle. In continental Europe Fascist movements were largely recruited from among Communists, and the opposite process may well happen within the next few years. What remains constant in the nationalist is his state of mind: the object of his feelings is changeable, and may be imaginary.


But for an intellectual, transference has an important function which I have already mentioned shortly in connection with Chesterton. It makes it possible for him to be much more nationalistic — more vulgar, more silly, more malignant, more dishonest — that he could ever be on behalf of his native country, or any unit of which he had real knowledge. When one sees the slavish or boastful rubbish that is written about Stalin, the Red Army, etc. by fairly intelligent and sensitive people, one realises that this is only possible because some kind of dislocation has taken place. In societies such as ours, it is unusual for anyone describable as an intellectual to feel a very deep attachment to his own country. Public opinion — that is, the section of public opinion of which he as an intellectual is aware — will not allow him to do so. Most of the people surrounding him are sceptical and disaffected, and he may adopt the same attitude from imitativeness or sheer cowardice: in that case he will have abandoned the form of nationalism that lies nearest to hand without getting any closer to a genuinely internationalist outlook. He still feels the need for a Fatherland, and it is natural to look for one somewhere abroad. Having found it, he can wallow unrestrainedly in exactly those emotions from which he believes that he has emancipated himself. God, the King, the Empire, the Union Jack — all the overthrown idols can reappear under different names, and because they are not recognised for what they are they can be worshipped with a good conscience. Transferred nationalism, like the use of scapegoats, is a way of attaining salvation without altering one's conduct.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Notorious 'progressive' a...