Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMedia systematically shields white people's identities in series of recent racial bias incidents
https://www.salon.com/2018/05/23/media-systematically-shields-white-peoples-identities-in-series-of-recent-racial-bias-incidents/The presumption of innocence is supposed to protect those accused of a crime, in law and in the press. In corporate media, that rule also seems to apply to white people who report people of color to the police for doing innocuous things. As FAIR found, their identities are far more closely protected than those of people falsely targeted for suspicious behavior.
In the past few weeks, major news media have been flooded with coverage of incidents of alleged racial profiling and implicit bias from golfers reported to police for playing too slowly, to picnickers fingered for using the wrong type of grill at a park. This coverage was prompted by viral videos and other social media posts released by the accused or by concerned bystanders, in real time or soon after these events occurred. The characters in these stories had one thing in common: The callers and officers involved were white; the alleged offenders, black or brown.
(snip)
These stories, while similar in content (often using the same quotes or incorporating Associated Press reports), didnt lack for details. Those accused, police, witnesses, and corporate and institutional leaders were interviewed. Multimedia elements were included, such as smartphone, regular, and police body cam videos, audio from 911 calls, police reports and screen captures of social media posts.
But almost across the board, while the accuseds names and personal details have been made public, the accusers remain unnamed. Though equally newsworthy, they were allowed to retain their anonymity.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 780 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Media systematically shields white people's identities in series of recent racial bias incidents (Original Post)
gollygee
May 2018
OP
Of course because you can't have others do to them what they have done to African-Americans
malaise
May 2018
#1
malaise
(268,863 posts)1. Of course because you can't have others do to them what they have done to African-Americans
That would be unAmerican.
unblock
(52,181 posts)2. Kinda like a white hood, huh
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,315 posts)3. In before the due-process sealions show up.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)4. In this country we seem to have different opinions of due process for different people. nt
brush
(53,761 posts)5. That is why doxxing of these racist callers is justified.
Perhaps if these people know they will be named it will put a stop to this racial profiling/siccing cops on POCs, and maybe stop some POCs from humiliation, injury, jailing and even killing as a result of police escalation.