Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
Thu May 24, 2018, 08:27 AM May 2018

NFL Forces Patriotism, Disrespects Flag

Joy Reid @JoyAnnReid 1h1 hour ago
Former NFL player lays waste to the league's hypocrisy on the American flag with one perfect photo

Writing on Twitter, the former player attacked the new NFL initiative by saying that “forced patriotism is the opposite of freedom.”

Rosenfels then dropped the hammer on the NFL itself by quoting the official U.S. flag code that was established in the 1940s.

“The flag should never be used as wearing apparel, bedding, or drapery,” the code reads in part. “The flag should never be used for advertising purposes in any way whatsoever.”


He then posted a photo of an official player jersey being sold by the NFL that incorporates the flag into a player’s number — which is a direct violation of the U.S. flag code.




read: https://www.rawstory.com/2018/05/former-nfl-player-lays-waste-leagues-hypocrisy-american-flag-one-perfect-photo/#.WwabtTQJlks.twitter




7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NFL Forces Patriotism, Disrespects Flag (Original Post) bigtree May 2018 OP
Sage has been great on this oberliner May 2018 #1
I get the intent but the code isn't law Blue_Adept May 2018 #2
This started in the 1960s cyclonefence May 2018 #3
I get it bigtree May 2018 #6
And how much is the Pentagon paying Lars39 May 2018 #4
Oh Benedict Donald! muntrv May 2018 #5
k and r...nt Stuart G May 2018 #7

Blue_Adept

(6,397 posts)
2. I get the intent but the code isn't law
Thu May 24, 2018, 08:31 AM
May 2018

as it's just guidelines and suggestions.

And the boat sailed on pretty much all of it ages ago, especially being used for things. We, as a nation, disrespected the flag ages ago.

cyclonefence

(4,483 posts)
3. This started in the 1960s
Thu May 24, 2018, 08:45 AM
May 2018

when cops began sewing little flag emblems on the upper sleeves of their jackets, in response to what was considered by the RW the lack of patriotism among protesters of the VietNam war. Until then, you very rarely saw the flag itself--bunting or separate elements of the flag, but not the flag in toto--used in any inappropriate way. It seems once the RW gets its filthy claws into something that belongs to all of us, they can't help but use it to wipe their asses.

We were taught in grade school and in Scouts to observe the rules about how the flag should be treated, and I continue to feel that way about it. It gives me a genuine pang to see our flag out in the rain, or dragging in the dirt. I don't consider my feelings to be patriotic in the ordinary way; I just think we owe it to this symbol of our freedom to treat it the way it should be treated, whether it's the law or not. There shouldn't nave to be a law to make us respect this symbol of our right *not* to treat it the way it should be treated.

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
6. I get it
Thu May 24, 2018, 09:21 AM
May 2018

...they need to be coerced into the tenets of the code with penalties before they square their hypocrisy.

It's obviously not meant to be compulsory. That's the point.

muntrv

(14,505 posts)
5. Oh Benedict Donald!
Thu May 24, 2018, 09:05 AM
May 2018

Excerpt from the article:

Jackson emphasizes that free expression overrides the goal of national unity. A compulsory flag pledge goes against the fundamental values of the First Amendment, which protects freedom of expression and thought from government intrusion in all but the most extreme cases. He concludes his opinion with a stirring reflection on the dangers of forced “unity” and the importance of individual liberty:


The case is made difficult not because the principles of its decision are obscure, but because the flag involved is our own. Nevertheless, we apply the limitations of the Constitution with no fear that freedom to be intellectually and spiritually diverse or even contrary will disintegrate the social organization. … [F]reedom to differ is not limited to things that do not matter much. That would be a mere shadow of freedom. The test of its substance is the right to differ as to things that touch the heart of the existing order.

If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion, or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein. If there are any circumstances which permit an exception, they do not now occur to us.

SEE MORE AT LINK BELOW

https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/west-virginia-v.-barnette-the-freedom-to-not-pledge-allegiance

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NFL Forces Patriotism, Di...