General Discussion

Atticus

(15,124 posts) Tue May 29, 2018, 06:00 PM May 2018

I just can't do it! It had been years since I'd visited "that site which shall not be named".

Today, I wondered what the knuckle-draggers were saying about Roseanne's cancellation. So,---I went there.

It was like going for a swim in a septic tank! Stupid is too weak a word for these racist twits. And, they are still using some of the same lame and simple-minded perjoratives and debunked conspiracy theories that they were spewing years ago!

Ugh! Never again.

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I just can't do it! It had been years since I'd visited "that site which shall not be named". (Original Post) Atticus May 2018 OP

Let me give you a hand. LastLiberal in PalmSprings May 2018 #1

+ 1 red dog 1 May 2018 #2

Yes, thanks! The laugh helped. nt Atticus May 2018 #7

Does "that site which shall not be named" start with the letter 'D' and end with the letter 'T'? red dog 1 May 2018 #3

Probably "F" and "R". byronius May 2018 #4

Probably "F" and "R"? red dog 1 May 2018 #5

You ain't been around onethatcares May 2018 #6

Cudna said it better. Yup, that's the one: Rimjob's joint. nt Atticus May 2018 #8

Free Republic. byronius May 2018 #9

I wonder if that is the site Atticus was referring to? red dog 1 May 2018 #10

Of course, I could be wrong, and often am. red dog 1 May 2018 #11

Yes. See post #8. nt Atticus May 2018 #13

Is it: progree May 2018 #12

LastLiberal in PalmSprings

(12,577 posts)

1. Let me give you a hand.

Reply to Atticus (Original post)

Tue May 29, 2018, 06:04 PM

May 2018

Feel better now?

red dog 1

(27,792 posts)

2. + 1

Reply to LastLiberal in PalmSprings (Reply #1)

Tue May 29, 2018, 06:08 PM

May 2018

Atticus

(15,124 posts)

7. Yes, thanks! The laugh helped. nt

Reply to LastLiberal in PalmSprings (Reply #1)

Tue May 29, 2018, 07:16 PM

May 2018

red dog 1

(27,792 posts)

3. Does "that site which shall not be named" start with the letter 'D' and end with the letter 'T'?

Reply to Atticus (Original post)

Tue May 29, 2018, 06:11 PM

May 2018

byronius

(7,392 posts)

4. Probably "F" and "R".

Reply to red dog 1 (Reply #3)

Tue May 29, 2018, 06:34 PM

May 2018

And I ain't ever goin' there agin.

red dog 1

(27,792 posts)

5. Probably "F" and "R"?

Reply to byronius (Reply #4)

Tue May 29, 2018, 06:43 PM

May 2018

Now I'm confused.

I THOUGHT I knew which site this thread was about, but now I'm not sure.

"F" & "R"??

onethatcares

(16,165 posts)

6. You ain't been around

Reply to red dog 1 (Reply #5)

Tue May 29, 2018, 06:48 PM

May 2018

in other words it would be unchained bunch of idiots because nothing rhymes with republic.

Atticus

(15,124 posts)

8. Cudna said it better. Yup, that's the one: Rimjob's joint. nt

Reply to onethatcares (Reply #6)

Tue May 29, 2018, 07:20 PM

May 2018

byronius

(7,392 posts)

9. Free Republic.

Reply to red dog 1 (Reply #5)

Tue May 29, 2018, 07:22 PM

May 2018

Now with Full Nazi!

red dog 1

(27,792 posts)

10. I wonder if that is the site Atticus was referring to?

Reply to byronius (Reply #9)

Tue May 29, 2018, 07:57 PM

May 2018

(Somehow, I doubt it)

red dog 1

(27,792 posts)

11. Of course, I could be wrong, and often am.

Reply to red dog 1 (Reply #10)

Tue May 29, 2018, 07:58 PM

May 2018

Atticus

(15,124 posts)

13. Yes. See post #8. nt

Reply to red dog 1 (Reply #10)

Tue May 29, 2018, 08:28 PM

May 2018

progree

(10,901 posts)

12. Is it:

Reply to Atticus (Original post)

Tue May 29, 2018, 08:26 PM

May 2018

JackPineRadicals -- That's the site that calls DU, "SV" and "the site that shall not be named" because they supposedly have a rule not to bitch about DU, so they instead use code words and phrases that everyone there knows. S.V. is "Site Voldemort" and refers to DU.

That said, I read one thread (27 posts) in JPR's General Discussion, and they were pretty much all glad to see her go, and no defenders (at a quick scan).

I read another thread (12 posts) in JPR's Latest Breaking News, and only one was against the cancellation, on so-called free speech grounds, and that person got about 3 negative responses.

I'm rather surprised, usually JPR is a cesspool of bizarre logic and idiocy.

Reply to this discussion