General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI'm trying to think of a constitutional provision that provides a remedy
to the people, short of outright revolution, when BOTH the executive branch and party holding power in the legislative branch are corrupt, as I believe they both are.
I don't think our founding fathers predicted something like this. But that's just a guess.
MichMan
(11,963 posts)k8conant
(3,030 posts)We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men and women are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness, and that whenever any President becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people peaceably to replace him.
...
And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.
Proclaimed this day in the Spirit, and the great Tradition, of July the 4th, 1776.
Igel
(35,350 posts)Checks and balances makes most big changes happen in slo-mo.
It also pays to remember that when the Constitution, the federal government was an itsy bitsy thing. Not the golem it's become. So even a "big change" was still pretty small, or could be tolerated until the next election.
When you are talking about corruption in a small organization that sets limits but doesn't deal with huge amounts of money and power, it's less of a big deal than corruption in a government that supports a hefty percentage of the population, amounts to a hefty percentage of GDP, and has laws and regulations for everything from international commerce and interstate commerce to the maximum amount of heavy metals allowed in the paint used on lead pencils.