Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Docreed2003

(16,855 posts)
Wed Jun 13, 2018, 12:15 AM Jun 2018

Happy Loving Day!!



Today in 1967 the "Loving" ruling was handed down. Cheers to all couples who love...and may love always conquer all!!

(As an aside, I love this pic....it's America, it's love, it's family....I could go on and on)


Effie???!!! You out there love??? I know you'd love to comment on this!
34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Happy Loving Day!! (Original Post) Docreed2003 Jun 2018 OP
Beautiful couple & family endured despite hate, racism. Close to home. appalachiablue Jun 2018 #1
Love conquers all!!! Docreed2003 Jun 2018 #4
A great pic, a great PIC, and a great DECISION! elleng Jun 2018 #2
Excellent!!! Docreed2003 Jun 2018 #3
Fine, Doc! elleng Jun 2018 #5
Love your posts and save many of your recipes Docreed2003 Jun 2018 #6
:hug: elleng Jun 2018 #7
Loving v. Virginia Landmark Supreme Court Case 1967; "Loving" (2016) movie review, Huff Po. appalachiablue Jun 2018 #8
Thank you for sharing this!! Much love! Docreed2003 Jun 2018 #13
Absolutely, a true love story and one with pain but able to rectify appalachiablue Jun 2018 #19
Outstanding movie. Duppers Jun 2018 #22
The film truly captured much of the environment, times appalachiablue Jun 2018 #27
🙏 for providing those details. Duppers Jun 2018 #28
Yes the court's decision under CJ Warren was monumental, appalachiablue Jun 2018 #29
What a beautiful family. Thanks for sharing! n/t pnwmom Jun 2018 #9
Agreed pnwmom! Beautiful and inspiring! Docreed2003 Jun 2018 #14
Aww, Sweet! Mahalo, Docreed! Cha Jun 2018 #10
Mahalo my dear Cha!! Docreed2003 Jun 2018 #15
Beautiful family and great picture Cha, glad to see so many Lovings! appalachiablue Jun 2018 #20
Hi Docreed syringis Jun 2018 #11
Thank you syringis!! Docreed2003 Jun 2018 #16
One of my favorite love stories malaise Jun 2018 #12
Mine too! Docreed2003 Jun 2018 #17
What a story; the movie adaptation and actors were superb. Close to home. appalachiablue Jun 2018 #30
Took my sis, her hubby and their sons malaise Jun 2018 #31
This message was self-deleted by its author appalachiablue Jun 2018 #32
Thanks malaise Jun 2018 #33
In that day heaven05 Jun 2018 #18
They did catch it, from avid racist necks they lived around in the country. appalachiablue Jun 2018 #34
It has always delighted me that the couple in this landmark decision had that perfect name. nt tblue37 Jun 2018 #21
K & R 👏👏 Duppers Jun 2018 #23
I wonder if today's Supreme Court would make bluecollar2 Jun 2018 #24
A great couple, so sad he died so young grantcart Jun 2018 #25
k&r bigtree Jun 2018 #26

elleng

(130,834 posts)
2. A great pic, a great PIC, and a great DECISION!
Wed Jun 13, 2018, 12:27 AM
Jun 2018

'These statutes also deprive the Lovings of liberty without due process of law in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The freedom to marry has long been recognized as one of the vital personal rights essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men.

Marriage is one of the "basic civil rights of man," fundamental to our very existence and survival. To deny this fundamental freedom on so unsupportable a basis as the racial classifications embodied in these statutes, classifications so directly subversive of the principle of equality at the heart of the Fourteenth Amendment, is surely to deprive all the State's citizens of liberty without due process of law. The Fourteenth Amendment requires that the freedom of choice to marry not be restricted by invidious racial discriminations. Under our Constitution, the freedom to marry, or not marry, a person of another race resides with the individual and cannot be infringed by the State.'

http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/loving.html

Docreed2003

(16,855 posts)
6. Love your posts and save many of your recipes
Wed Jun 13, 2018, 12:56 AM
Jun 2018

Didn't want you to think that you weren't appreciated around these parts!

appalachiablue

(41,113 posts)
8. Loving v. Virginia Landmark Supreme Court Case 1967; "Loving" (2016) movie review, Huff Po.
Wed Jun 13, 2018, 02:05 AM
Jun 2018

Huff Po, "Here’s The History Behind ‘Loving,’ A New Film About A Major Civil Rights Victory," April 4, 2016

The movie celebrates the love story at the center of Loving v. Virginia, the Supreme Court case that ended racial discrimination for marriage. In 1958, Richard Loving, a white man, and Mildred Jeter, a black woman, drove north from their home in Virginia to Washington, D.C., to get married. Upon returning to Virginia, they were dragged out of bed and arrested by the police. The Lovings’ marriage was not legally valid due to the state’s law barring interracial marriage. The ensuing legal battle upended the lives of the Lovings and their three children for almost a decade.

The 2016 film is beautiful in its restraint, anchored by tender moments in the couple’s life. Actors Joel Edgerton and Ruth Negga bring a quiet intensity to their magnificent performances as Richard and Mildred... Loving v. Virginia was and remains an important political and historical landmark, knocking down a major pillar of Jim Crow segregation and, more recently, serving as precedent in the fight to legalize same-sex marriage. In one fell swoop, the court’s 1967 ruling, which concluded that Virginia’s ban on interracial marriage violated both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment, invalidated all state laws that banned interracial marriage.



These anti-miscegenation laws, as they were known, represented one of the last existing formal mechanisms for segregation, according to Virginia Tech historian Peter Wallenstein, who has written two books on the Loving case. While many states that once had such laws had repealed them by the 1960s, interracial marriage bans remained on the books in almost the entire South, even after Brown v. Board of Education in 1954 and the wave of civil rights legislation in the 1960s addressed most of the major Jim Crow laws that imposed segregation...

As the film shows, the civil rights movement was what catalyzed Mildred Loving to seek legal action. She wrote to then-Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy, who referred to her to the American Civil Liberties Union. Two of the organization’s lawyers ultimately took on the case and represented the Lovings before the high court.
“If the Lovings hadn’t come along, if Mrs. Loving hadn’t written that letter and then followed up, then we wouldn’t have a story to be talking about." —Peter Wallenstein, Virginia Tech historian.
...In its unanimous ruling, the Supreme Court determined that marriage is “fundamental to our very existence and survival.” Under the 14th Amendment, “the freedom of choice to marry not be restricted by invidious racial discriminations,” Chief Justice Earl Warren wrote in the opinion... More, https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/loving-v-virginia-movie_us_581aee7ee4b0c43e6c1e2dfe

*Read, NYT, 'Mildred Loving, Who Battled Ban on Mixed-Race Marriage, Dies at 68,' May 6, 2008
https://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/06/us/06loving.html



"Loving" Film Trailer, Actors Joel Egerton, Ruth Negga as Richard Loving & Mildred Jeter Loving of Caroline Co., Virginia.

appalachiablue

(41,113 posts)
19. Absolutely, a true love story and one with pain but able to rectify
Wed Jun 13, 2018, 08:42 AM
Jun 2018

longstanding hateful and harmful laws against interracial marriage, the legal status of children born of them and inheritance rights. And the movie was very well done I thought. Thank you for remembering and the post.

https://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/06/us/06loving.html

appalachiablue

(41,113 posts)
27. The film truly captured much of the environment, times
Wed Jun 13, 2018, 12:52 PM
Jun 2018

and closeness of the couple even with the serious legal and social issues, also some harassment that they faced in rural Caroline Co., Va. where both were raised.

In 1975, Richard unfortunately died young at age 41, after his car was hit by a drunk driver and Mildred lost an eye from the accident. She missed and needed him, and passed away years later at age 68 in 2008.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loving_v._Virginia

Duppers

(28,117 posts)
28. 🙏 for providing those details.
Wed Jun 13, 2018, 02:34 PM
Jun 2018

It's truly sad that Richard died too young. Mildred may have lived longer had he not been killed.

I'm grateful that this court's decision has allowed thousands of couples to marry whom they choose. My son may benefit from this ruling; they're currently just cohabiting.


appalachiablue

(41,113 posts)
29. Yes the court's decision under CJ Warren was monumental,
Thu Jun 14, 2018, 06:47 PM
Jun 2018

and your son will be able to marry who he chooses and loves like so many others. From reading and the film, the Lovings moved to DC for a while for protection basically, but returned to their home area where they were happier.

In DC at work I met Chief Justice Warren Burger who was on the Warren court and also had major case decisions as CJ.

syringis

(5,101 posts)
11. Hi Docreed
Wed Jun 13, 2018, 04:10 AM
Jun 2018

I love the pic !

No matter your skin color, origin, culture, religion or sexual orientation.

None of these traits has ever been, and will never be, a relevant yardstick to define a human being's value.

It is a heartbreaking in 2018, we still need to fight such nonsense!


Response to malaise (Reply #31)

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
18. In that day
Wed Jun 13, 2018, 08:23 AM
Jun 2018

Last edited Fri Jun 15, 2018, 09:12 AM - Edit history (1)

those kids caught hell from whites and AA. More from the 'superior race' FOR SURE. I forgot to add, I'm one of those bi-racial human beings who grew to manhood in the 50's and 60's in ameriKKKa.

appalachiablue

(41,113 posts)
34. They did catch it, from avid racist necks they lived around in the country.
Thu Jun 14, 2018, 07:24 PM
Jun 2018

Theirs is an amazing and touching story, two young, decent people who only wanted to live and love.

bigtree

(85,984 posts)
26. k&r
Wed Jun 13, 2018, 12:31 PM
Jun 2018

...I was seven.

Mom and Dad endured backlash over their marriage because of Mom's light skin, mostly indistinguishable from white Americans.

I suffered almost zero direct opposition to my own mixed marriage in our 38 years together, although we have sought to hide the fact in several situations where we feared negative judgment.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Happy Loving Day!!