General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOcasio Cortez is yet another example of Democratic Women dominating the primaries
What does she stand for?
We must also fully fund the offices of public defenders, decriminalize poverty, end arbitration clauses that shield corporate abuses of everyday Americans, and provide comprehensive mental health care to both incarcerated communities and law enforcement.
Mass incarceration is the latest iteration of a long line of policies (Jim Crow, redlining, etc) rooted in the marginalization of African Americans and people of color. Comprehensive criminal justice reform is part of the work that must be done to heal our past and pursue racial justice in the United States.
https://ocasio2018.com/issues
She's quite a bit more than your average OR candidate. She's actually an impressive woman who understands that Civil Rights are just as important as economic rights.
In fact, she's your typical liberal New York Democrat.
I welcome her to Congress. And keep rocking on, women. We will fix this atrocity.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)Of course, those who lost were outspent pretty severely.
NY_20th
(1,028 posts)Ocasio-Cortez's victory is only the latest example of a very clear trend in Democratic primaries in 2018: When women run, they win.
No one has cataloged the success of female Democratic candidates in this election cycle better than The Cook Political Report's House Editor David Wasserman. Following the June 12 primaries, Wasserman tweeted two amazing facts.
First, this: "Remarkable: after tonight, Dems have nominated women in 73/150 (49%) of '18 House races (excluding Dem incumbents). On GOP side, just 18/112 (16%)."
Then, this: "UPDATE: so far in 2018 Dem House primaries featuring at least one woman, one man & no incumbent, women have been the top vote-getters in 66/93 cases (71%). On GOP side, just 9/26 (35%). Never seen anything like it."
https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/26/politics/joe-crowley-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-new-york-upset/index.html
dixiegrrrrl
(60,160 posts)Just saw her ad. It is powerful.
All I want is for the self righteous, self centered, self satisfied Republicans &radical Christians to keep right on under-estimating
people like her, like us.
gotta give credit to her opponent, he immeidately endorsed her run this fall.
In case you missed it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=22&v=rq3QXIVR0bs
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)As Nathaniel Rakich at 538 wrote a short while ago:
Can the Year of the Woman overcome even a multimillion-dollar juggernaut? Nope. Wealthy men defeated strong female candidates in the Democratic primaries for Colorado governor (Jared Polis over Cary Kennedy), Marylands 6th District (David Trone over Aruna Miller), and New Yorks 1st District (Perry Gershon over Kate Browning).
NY_20th
(1,028 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)ismnotwasm
(42,674 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)They say she's a Democratic Socialist. Is that a political party? I looked it up and found DSA, but it doesn't say whether it's a party.
NY_20th
(1,028 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)NY_20th
(1,028 posts)OR biased media and OR biased groups call her that.
The OR type groups endorsed her because they want to tear down and rebuild the party, so their goal was more aimed at ousting Crowley than anything else. The district won't be harmed though because it's solid blue and safe. But the goal of ousting Crowley actually helps secure Pelosi's reign, so it kind of backfired on them.
She aligns with Democratic Socialists, but she is a member of the Democratic Party.
She's pretty much your typical New York State liberal Democrat.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)The voters have spoken. But seems to me dangerous times to switch out experienced, powerful Senators for new ones who don't have any clout and need to learn the ropes. It takes a while to be comfortable in a new job and learn what's what.
NY_20th
(1,028 posts)transition.
She'll be fine.
She brings youth and energy, and despite her taking a photo with Susan Sarandon, she's a great person, and a great candidate for her district.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Sarandon hurt Hillary's chances of winning by pushing the Russian-connected Jill Stein.
But not my state, so it's what NY wants that counts.
LostOne4Ever
(9,752 posts)For instance, one can be ideologically a socialist, progressive, or left-libertarian and still be a democrat.
NY_20th
(1,028 posts)Adenoid_Hynkel
(14,093 posts)I'd like to get her on record if she shares Dore's Seth Rich truther views, Assange fandom or baseless claims that Hillary has Parkinson's.
And was she OK with their Bernie or Bust aid to Trump?
NY_20th
(1,028 posts)She was endorsed by those crazy groups, but does not seem to uphold to their values.
I would credit the NYS WFP for her victory more than these radical groups.
This is/was a Hillary district.
Low turnout and WFP efforts at getting out the vote helped her win.
She's a typical NYC liberal.
Link to tweet
herding cats
(20,049 posts)It's a done deal and she's the Democratic candidate. I don't know if you live in her district (I don't) but all that matters to me is keeping the seat in November.
If she doesn't have the chops for the work, I'm sure her constituents can find someone else to replace her during the next primary. However, it appears they believe she does have what it takes. Ultimately it's their choice and only theirs to make.
JI7
(93,616 posts)so we don't have to worry about republicans taking it.
house races are every 2 years so if she was really some jimmy dore type she will lose the primary next time around and we will get another democrat.
but i have a feeling she will start focusing on actual issues that matter to her constituents.
herding cats
(20,049 posts)I've read that the exploitation of any rift shouldn't have an effect on the seat. It's just that after 2016 I refuse to take anything for granted ever again.
The Democrats in her district have made their choice, and theirs are the only voices that matter in this race.
Although the seat doesn't affect me on a local level, as a Democrat I fully support Ocasio Cortez's win in November because it does affect all of us on a national level. After that, I hope she does do well by her voters and has a long career serving them well.
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)You write that you "have a feeling she will start focusing on actual issues that matter to her constituents."
Your use of "start" implies that she hasn't been doing that so far. Is that your opinion? If so, what's it based on?
Perhaps the victory of a Bernie Sanders supporter implies that the "issue" of party affiliation matters less to her constituents than it does to some people on DU.
Wwcd
(6,288 posts)Gee, I sure hope she gives credit to the woman she quoted.
Has she ever mentioned Sec Clinton?
Campaigned for het?
Attended her many speeches?
Given credit to candidate Clinton for her lifeling work for human rights? Women's rights, planned Parenthiid, people of all races colors nations & faiths?
How bout HRC's many years of advocating for LBGTQ?
Has she given credit to the Woman who braved the world in 1995 to speak on behalf of Woman's Rights are Human Rights?
Haven't heard her mention this Woman she quotes & aligns her ideals so closely with.
That's rather disrespectful, but maybe she just forgot.
Just wondering.
Here's the Video
HRC ~ Bejing 1995
Its most prominent usage is as the name of a speech given by Hillary Rodham Clinton, the First Lady of the United States, on 5 September 1995, at the United Nations Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing. In this speech she sought to closely link the notion of women's rights with that of human rights.
----------
Here's the text of HRC's speech from the UN:
Lets compare:
http://www.un.org/esa/gopher-data/conf/fwcw/conf/gov/950905175653.txt