General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRoe is done. Some states will keep abortion legal. What then?
Are they going to prohibit women from traveling? Will women have to take a pregnancy exam before they board a plane or bus? And then take another one when they return?
kimbutgar
(21,130 posts)I think we are on track now for this country breaking up as a union of 50 states.
I think some kind of breakup of the country is inevitable. My cousin has already invited me to his condo when Calexit happens.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)... too many PoC for another break up like the civil war to happen.
Unless the southeast of the country kicks out all PoC and patriots another civil war is a long way off.
geardaddy
(24,926 posts)Plus you have a blue state like MN, which is only really blue in the metropolitan areas and parts of the the Iron Range. The rest is deep red. Minneapolis and St. Paul would be a blue island unto itself in the middle of a sea of red.
OliverQ
(3,363 posts)Let the red states have their authoritarian dictatorship. Blue states need to form a new nation more like Canada, or just merge with Canada.
roamer65
(36,745 posts)Politically they are as well.
dhol82
(9,352 posts)Takket
(21,560 posts)Please come rescue me Trudeau!!!
FakeNoose
(32,633 posts)Please invade us Canada! I like Molson's and ice hockey.
exboyfil
(17,862 posts)Maybe Arizona, New Mexico, and Colorado
MarcA
(2,195 posts)Indiana and Ohio too for geopolitical reasons although don't know
if they would go along. But Alberta would probably join the other
group, can't win them all.
HAB911
(8,880 posts)for real
Still In Wisconsin
(4,450 posts)they control the Federal government... then suddenly they forget all about them.
AlexSFCA
(6,137 posts)Still In Wisconsin
(4,450 posts)disappointed. She will be "concerned and troubled" but at the end of the day she will go along with McTurtle and TRUMP.
Response to AlexSFCA (Reply #14)
Name removed Message auto-removed
dhol82
(9,352 posts)Worthless.
Freethinker65
(10,009 posts)no_hypocrisy
(46,080 posts)d_r
(6,907 posts)deep in Mississippi and Louisiana, hell, Alabama and Georgia for that matter, will have a long way to go to get to the other side of Arkansas to maybe St. Louis, but probably more like Illinois.
One hope I have is that medicinal abortions are way beyond where they were in 1973, so maybe the back alley abortions will be more safe today. It is fucking horrible.
AlexSFCA
(6,137 posts)while same sex marriage will go back to the states
Yavin4
(35,437 posts)A federal ban would require a federal law.
AlexSFCA
(6,137 posts)which not the worst thing in the world. Groups like planned parenthood may be able to offer transportation assistance for out of state abortion.
jpljr77
(1,004 posts)If a woman lives in, let's say, Houston, where would she go when Texas outlaws abortion? Louisiana? Oklahoma? Arkansas? See the pattern here?
Yavin4
(35,437 posts)We're becoming a tiered-rights nation.
Ilsa
(61,694 posts)I have this on good authority from a public figure (actress) who used to advocate for women's reproductive rights. They passed the hat until they got enough money for a plane ticket to CA or NY or whatever it took. This was pre- Roe days. And they were the lucky ones, to have friends they could trust who could help.
Young women need to set aside money for "abortion insurance" to include the procedure and travel money and time off from work money. And maybe stock up on the morning after pill while they can get it, or locate a supply. It's going to be really hard, but I think we can minimize back alley abortions and loss of life. It shouldn't have to be this way, though. Maybe Planned Parenthood can find a way to help fund travel.
Takket
(21,560 posts)I think a charity to support travel and lodging for abortions would be needed. I would support it as generously as I could.
roamer65
(36,745 posts)jmowreader
(50,553 posts)The Constitution (which the hard right doesn't really like, regardless of what they claim) severely limits Congress' ability to make laws: before they can act, the issue has to cross state lines. This is why the federal government has no authority to make laws regarding noncommercial motor vehicle operation, but they can make laws regarding commercial motor vehicle operation.
Unless the federal government can prove significant amounts of interstate commerce in abortions beyond people traveling across state lines to purchase the service, abortion raises no significant federal question. The only way the federal government could ban abortion nationwide, even if Roe were overturned, is to pass a constitutional amendment.
Yavin4
(35,437 posts)abortions.
jmowreader
(50,553 posts)There are a bunch of cases - Shapiro v Thompson is a big one - that say traveling from one state to another is a fundamental right.
I have a strange suspicion that a law requiring a negative pregnancy test before someone was allowed to travel would be shot down on Fourth Amendment grounds.
(Fighting sovereign citizen bullshit is both fun and educational...)
Without a constitutional amendment banning abortion, they'll be facing a crazy quilt of state laws. And if our side has a lick of sense, we'll set up sort of an underground railroad to ferry people from "ban" states to "freedom" ones for the procedure.
Baitball Blogger
(46,700 posts)complicit in a coup, that every case that Gorsuch sat on where he placed the deciding vote should be overturned.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)MarcA
(2,195 posts)Demovictory9
(32,449 posts)Tipperary
(6,930 posts)Did this just happen?
Yavin4
(35,437 posts)Just a matter of time.
Tipperary
(6,930 posts)I am not a fan of defeatism.
MarcA
(2,195 posts)you could have done something is a waste.
peggysue2
(10,828 posts)the issue will have to be fought all over again. And it will be.
But since none of us have a crystal ball nor can we reach into the future, we do what we can in the moment. Keep our eyes on how we bring a halt, a containment to the recklessness of an incompetent, crass, compromised and thoroughly immoral Administration.
Which always brings us back to the same thing: making the Blue Wave a reality and sweeping these creatures out of office.
That's where we start. That's what we can control.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)They claim to be pro-choice.
dhol82
(9,352 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)http://time.com/4877922/health-care-vote-senate-skinny-repeal-murkowski-collins/
dhol82
(9,352 posts)MarcA
(2,195 posts)Guy Whitey Corngood
(26,500 posts).
0rganism
(23,943 posts)of course, the wealthy will easily bypass such restrictions
others will be forced to exist under the laws of the New Republic of Gilead
MarcA
(2,195 posts)and increased checkpoints for all sorts of things. Look at all the
seizures (theft) from the War on Drugs and a War on Illegal Abortion
fits right in.
irisblue
(32,967 posts)I know an older neighbor girl went from metro Detroit to NYC, abortion was legal there in 1970.
It will still happen
dhol82
(9,352 posts)I had lots of roommates in the early years.
Too many sad stories.
And, one where, if you knew the right people, you could get an abortion at a premier hospital by a well known surgeon.
It was interesting to see both ends of the problem.
One other story was about birth control. I was going to an Italian gynecologist who had privileges at St. Vincents Hospital - very catholic, nuns, etc. Went to him for a refill on my BC pills. He informed me that since I was not married he could not ethically give me a prescription. Hospital told him so. Guess they figured I would stop the evil sex if I was afraid of getting pregnant.
I found another doctor.
Meowmee
(5,164 posts)I won't have to move prolly, but I doubt that will happen because in my part of NY there are too many recons. Women who can afford to will go to states that keep it legal, like they did before. Many will have illegal abortions again or do it themselves. One of my friends from Taiwan told me her grandmother gave herself 2 abortions. People who think abortion will ever stop are delusional.
Qutzupalotl
(14,302 posts)Last edited Thu Jun 28, 2018, 12:33 AM - Edit history (1)
Think about it. They could have written legislation to restrict abortions when they had the Senate, House and White House in 2001 and they never even brought it up.
They talk as though its important to them (culture of life) but they really dont give a shit. They need a wedge issue to use in elections. Tarring us as pro-abortion is convenient and doesnt cost them anything. What they are really after is tax cuts and deregulation for businesses.
If they overturn Roe, what will they run on? What will they tar us with? Thats why I think they may chip away at abortion rights around the edges but wont fully overturn.
Mind you, Im not advocating complacency. We still need to fight like hell as citizens, even if Congress has little power to stop them.
Yavin4
(35,437 posts)Abortion moves from a legal fight to a political/cultural one.
Qutzupalotl
(14,302 posts)In all other races, opponents would be from the same state.
pstokely
(10,525 posts)chipping away, not overturning
Qutzupalotl
(14,302 posts)but youll note how it keeps the issue alive for future elections...
treestar
(82,383 posts)They would not have their wedge issue. And a lot of those voters would go back to the Democrats, as they are one issue voters who often are in favor of economic and environmental regulation.
mr_liberal
(1,017 posts)What the Republican party does and what conservative supreme court justices do. Conservative justices will vote what they think is right constitutionally, they won't worry about the politics.
It's also not a case of what the national Republican party will do, but what will happen at the state level in red states. There already are laws in states that ban abortion that are just waiting for a supreme court to allow them to stand.
What will happen has already been stated in the thread. Roe v Wade will be overturned or chipped away at and states will ban abortion or pass further restrictions. The national federal Republican party may vote for some restrictions at the federal level but I doubt it, they'll leave it up to the states.
Vinca
(50,261 posts)Maybe we'll be able to set up an underground delivery of abortion drugs, but that won't help someone further along in the pregnancy. I also wouldn't be surprised if an ultra-conservative court gets contraception up for grabs again either. We've taken so much for granted for so long. Elections have consequences and this one could be pretty severe.
UTUSN
(70,683 posts)GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)They will have bought a pig in a poke and they know it.
Cause trying will be jumping the shark. And they know it.
But we will see if they can reign in their theocracy wing.
It was great for drumming up the radical core, but that is not enough for them. They will find that some things do override their voodoo economic arguments.
LonePirate
(13,417 posts)States forcing women to carry pregnancies to term is a clear case of involuntary servitude which was explicitly prohibited by the 13th Amendment.