NYT: Nomination is Trump's finest hour, his classiest move.

[RandySF]

Link to tweet

?s=21

[jrthin]

1. To the NYT's, my middle finger. nt

[Guy Whitey Corngood]

2. .

??







.

[Cha]

3. Akhil Reed Amar is fucking Stupid.

Last edited Tue Jul 10, 2018, 09:38 AM - Edit history (1)

[Tipperary]

42. It is an opinion piece, not the NYT opinion. They have an editorial warning against Kavanaugh,

which is the NYT opinion.

[Cha]

43. I saw that NYT Editoral piece just a little while ago

There's So Much You Don't Know About Brett Kavanaugh - by the NYT Editorial Board

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100210849912

Thanks, Tipperrary.. I'm going to edit my post.. I mistakenly blamed the whole NYT for one guy's opinion.

[BigmanPigman]

4. Whose opinion is this?

Who wrote this for the Times?

[dalton99a]

9. Akhil Reed Amar - some "liberal" from the Federalist Society

Liberal, my ass

[Volaris]

31. Lol @ 'a liberal' from the federalist society...

Now we have proof that they're just MAKING SHIT UP.

[DeminPennswoods]

12. Some Yale law professor

named Akhil Reed Amar, who claims to be a liberal, and is also one of Kavanaugh's former law professors at Yale. I wouldn't take it too seriously.

[BigmanPigman]

30. OK, that explains it.

I guess he is the same type of law professor as Dershowitz...an ass.

[Mme. Defarge]

5. That's hardly saying much

given the EXTREMELY low bar he has set.

[Crunchy Frog]

6. That's why I'm not a subscriber.

[dalton99a]

7. Akhil Reed Amar - "His work has won awards from the Federalist Society"

https://law.yale.edu/akhil-reed-amar

'Nuf said

[a kennedy]

8. What??? The lib times agrees with this insane pick???

[AlexSFCA]

10. WTF???

[octoberlib]

11. Crap like this article are why I prefer the Washington Post

[Control-Z]

18. Yup. I actually pay for the Washington Post.

I never run out of free articals this way!

[octoberlib]

34. Me too! I subscribe to the Times, too but think I'm going to cancel.

The Times had 6 reporters covering Dershowitz's shunning in Martha's Vineyard. Six! I've had enough.

[Grassy Knoll]

13. Fuck His Opinion , How Bout That...

Go Work For Trump's Ass Cleaners At Fox News , Bozo!

[The Velveteen Ocelot]

14. One guy's opinion, not a NYT editorial.

And you know what they say about opinions.

[Takket]

15. have they lost their minds?????????????

[Docreed2003]

16. Fucking baw bags...

[Scurrilous]

17. ...

[Varaddem]

19. I thought I read on here

Aren’t Russians the majority stockholder’s?

[RainCaster]

20. Time to cancel my NYT subscription

Amazon.com gets too much of my money already, but the WaPo may be getting a little more of my allowance.

[Anon-C]

21. Never ever forget this editorial - 10 years from now.

[Dr Hobbitstein]

36. It's an opinion piece, NOT an editorial. NT

[GoCubsGo]

22. If that's the case, it's pretty damn pathetic.

Announcing the name of some guy other people picked out for him? Seventy-one-years-old, and that's the pinnacle of his useless-ass life? Give me a fucking break.

[Glimmer of Hope]

23. Nothing about Trump is fine or classy. Not a thing.

[DemocratSinceBirth]

24. It's the opinion of Akhil Reed Amar.

I would make book the Times editorial board opposes his appointment.

[highplainsdem]

25. Please change your subject line to "NYT op-ed contributor:" -- what you have now

with just "NYT:" suggests, incorrectly, that it's from the NYT editorial board.

[DemocratSinceBirth]

28. The comment section is great. The author of the editorial is getting roasted.

[Maven]

26. The NYT is broken. nt

[greatauntoftriplets]

27. That has to have been written by a man.

[Tipperary]

41. Yes, and not someone who works for the Times.

[UTUSN]

29. *Barf* - I mean, *huh*?!1

[triron]

32. Normalization of a traitor to the United States. WTF!

[Princess Turandot]

33. Please change your title to clarify that this is just a contributor's 'opinion'..

..not the NYT Editorial Board's view

[Tipperary]

40. Exactly. Not sure what the op is trying to accomplish here.

Very misleading op. Unrec.

[JHan]

35. It's a silly op-ed by a ridiculous person.

They did have a weird column recently though - from their editorial board about Democrats not surrendering the judiciary to Trump. A long column devoid of any ideas. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/06/opinion/democrats-fight-trump-supreme-court.html

[Tipperary]

39. Thank you. And their editorial today warns against Kavanaugh.

[kentuck]

37. A blind hog can find an acorn every once in a while...

That does not mean it has 20/20 vision.

[Tipperary]

38. Perhaps you should link to the NYT editorial, which is THEIR opinion. This is someone ELSE'S

opinion. Your headline is misleading.

The NYT editorial, THEIR opinion, warns AGAINST this choice. Smh.

[GusBob]

44. So. How 'bout now, dude?

Kennedy made the pick, not Trump