HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Amnesty International on ...

Tue Jan 3, 2012, 11:53 AM

Amnesty International on NDAA: ""Trust me" is not enough of a safeguard"

"Despite expressing serious reservations, the Obama administration has paved the way for legislation that will authorize indefinite detention. The bill places enormous power in the hands of future Presidents, and the only answer the President has is to say "trust me."

"Once any government has the authority to hold people indefinitely, the risk is that it can be almost impossible to rein such power in. President Obama has failed to take the one action – a veto – that would have blocked the dangerous provisions in the NDAA. In so doing, he has allowed human rights to be further undermined and given Al Qaeda a propaganda victory."

Amnesty International and over 45 other organizations will protest the NDAA and Guantanamo in front of the White House on January 11--the 10th anniversary of the "war on terror" prison. Sign up at http://www.amnestyusa.org/jan11.

http://www.amnestyusa.org/news/press-releases/trust-me-is-not-enough-of-a-safeguard-says-amnesty-international-as-president-obama-signs-the-ndaa-i

22 replies, 3679 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 22 replies Author Time Post
Reply Amnesty International on NDAA: ""Trust me" is not enough of a safeguard" (Original post)
Luminous Animal Jan 2012 OP
mmonk Jan 2012 #1
Autumn Jan 2012 #2
a simple pattern Jan 2012 #5
quinnox Jan 2012 #3
comipinko Jan 2012 #4
Remember Me Jan 2012 #19
comipinko Jan 2012 #20
Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2012 #6
Ichingcarpenter Jan 2012 #7
Luminous Animal Jan 2012 #8
i_sometimes Jan 2012 #13
Luminous Animal Jan 2012 #9
T S Justly Jan 2012 #10
hfojvt Jan 2012 #11
Luminous Animal Jan 2012 #17
Odin2005 Jan 2012 #12
QC Jan 2012 #14
midnight Jan 2012 #15
bvar22 Jan 2012 #16
theaocp Jan 2012 #18
SpiralHawk Jan 2012 #21
Wind Dancer Jan 2012 #22

Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)

Tue Jan 3, 2012, 11:55 AM

1. Bingo.

We have a winner.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)

Tue Jan 3, 2012, 11:57 AM

2. I'm not even sure he trusts himself.

He had "serious reservations" about it and signed it anyway. Some times you just have to say, hell no I'm not doing this.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Autumn (Reply #2)

Tue Jan 3, 2012, 12:05 PM

5. "my Administration will not authorize the indefinite military detention without trial of American

 

citizens..." ... I'll leave that for all future Presidents whoever they may be... probably...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)

Tue Jan 3, 2012, 11:57 AM

3. Papers please!

 

The NDAA is a giant step towards this nightmare Orwellian vision coming to the USA. 1930s Germany is not something to strive to emulate.

Saying "My fellow Americans, I promise I won't use this" is meaningless, because Obama will be gone eventually, maybe sooner rather than later depending on the elections.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)

Tue Jan 3, 2012, 11:58 AM

4. This hatred of Obama is getting out of hand.

 

I think "trust me" is good enough. Afterall, or government knows best.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to comipinko (Reply #4)

Tue Jan 3, 2012, 09:39 PM

19. This betrayal by Obama is getting out of hand

 

YOU may trust Obama (I don't think I do) -- but what about the next guy? Or the one after that?

We're supposed to be "a nation of LAWS, not men." So we don't have to rely on their good will.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Remember Me (Reply #19)

Wed Jan 4, 2012, 09:30 AM

20. LOL, forgot to add: " sarcasm"

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)

Tue Jan 3, 2012, 12:13 PM

6. In a democracy the people are not supposed to "trust" politicians.

 

"History has tried to teach us that we can't have good government under politicians.  Now, to go and stick one at the very head of government couldn’t be wise." Mark Twain

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)

Tue Jan 3, 2012, 12:15 PM

7. Time to throw Amnesty International under the bus

they must hate Obama too.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ichingcarpenter (Reply #7)

Tue Jan 3, 2012, 12:22 PM

8. Amnesty International is a Paulite.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Luminous Animal (Reply #8)

Tue Jan 3, 2012, 01:15 PM

13. *wiping screen*

 

Oh boy....LMAO!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)

Tue Jan 3, 2012, 12:36 PM

9. Kick.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)

Tue Jan 3, 2012, 12:38 PM

10. K&R (nt)

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)

Tue Jan 3, 2012, 12:44 PM

11. what if it is s-s-s-sung s-s-s-s-softly

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hfojvt (Reply #11)

Tue Jan 3, 2012, 03:39 PM

17. Oh, I loved watching that movie with my daughter when she was little!

So many good songs!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)

Tue Jan 3, 2012, 12:52 PM

12. AI goes under da bus!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)

Tue Jan 3, 2012, 01:17 PM

14. They're just jealous! n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)

Tue Jan 3, 2012, 01:19 PM

15. Boy the last time we heard a similar phrase was from the bankers.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)

Tue Jan 3, 2012, 01:20 PM

16. "Serious Reservations", but signs it anyway.

His name will now always be at the bottom of this horrendous bill.
It IS the historical equivalent of "I APPROVE this message."

He SHOULD have refused to sign it,
and DARED Congress to pass it over his veto,
unless he was just bullshitting again about having "serious reservations."

That way, HIS Name would NOT appear at the bottom of this historical document.

[font size=6] ..Because ITS the LAW now![/font]
signing statements and other equivocations do not matter.



You will know them by their WORKS,
not by their excuses.
[font size=5 color=green][center]Solidarity99![/font][font size=2 color=green]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------[/center]

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bvar22 (Reply #16)

Tue Jan 3, 2012, 08:08 PM

18. I have no idea

why this is such a hard concept to grasp, unless people just do not want to understand it. That might make some sense. What a clusterfuck.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)

Wed Jan 4, 2012, 09:46 AM

21. k and r

 

k and r

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)

Wed Jan 4, 2012, 09:58 AM

22. K&R

Excellent article - EVERYBODY should be outraged over this. The apologists will regret this one day, mark my word.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread