Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

MrScorpio

(73,631 posts) Sun Jul 29, 2018, 04:51 AM Jul 2018

Oh, please, Ted

Link to tweet

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Oh, please, Ted (Original Post) MrScorpio Jul 2018 OP

Ted, who the hell duforsure Jul 2018 #1

Local Republicans were saying he would not get a next term two years ago and there was no ... marble falls Jul 2018 #2

I thought Republicans cyclonefence Jul 2018 #3

duforsure

(11,885 posts)

1. Ted, who the hell

Reply to MrScorpio (Original post)

Sun Jul 29, 2018, 05:42 AM

Jul 2018

trusts a serial liar and corrupt person like you for the truth? You got bigger problems YOU should be worried about Ted about what you have done. That's why he losing support fast in Texas now, no one trusts this guy. He's in trouble, and it'll catch up to him eventually.

marble falls

(57,083 posts)

2. Local Republicans were saying he would not get a next term two years ago and there was no ...

Reply to duforsure (Reply #1)

Sun Jul 29, 2018, 08:48 AM

Jul 2018

one declared to run against him in 2018. That's pretty unusual.

cyclonefence

(4,483 posts)

3. I thought Republicans

Reply to MrScorpio (Original post)

Sun Jul 29, 2018, 09:41 AM

Jul 2018

were all about the rights of businesses to refuse to serve anyone they wanted to refuse service to (like decide who to make wedding cakes for, or whether to fill prescriptions). And even refusing accommodations in interstate commerce has nothing to do with the FA.

Reply to this discussion