Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Case Against Paul Manafort You Won't Hear at His Trial
?w=990
Paul Manafort is set to go on trial Tuesday, but it wont be for conspiring with Russians to help elect President Donald Trump. In a hearing last week in US District Court in Alexandria, Virginia, Greg Andres, a top prosecutor under Special Counsel Robert Mueller, said that prosecutors dont intend to mention alleged collusion with the Russians during the trial of Donald Trumps former campaign chairman on tax evasion and bank fraud charges.
Nor have prosecutors accused Manafort of conspiring with Moscow as part of a separate case in Washington, DC, scheduled to go to trial in September, in which Manafort faces charges that include money laundering, fraud, illegal lobbying, and obstruction of justice.
Trump and some of his defenders contend that Muellers prosecution of Manafort on charges unrelated to collaboration with Russia during the 2016 election means such evidence does not exist. But that is a flawed assumption. The special counsel has constructed cases that offer the best chance of convicting Manafort, building on investigations that began years before the 2016 race. If Manafort is convicted, prosecutors may hope to use what could essentially amount to a life sentence to push him to cooperate with their broader investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 campaign.
Mueller also has reason to avoid charging Manafort now with crimes that might involve conspiracy with Russians. (Though collusion is not a crime, prosecutors could bring conspiracy charges against Americans involved in disseminating emails or data stolen from Democrats.) Doing so would require Mueller to publicly share evidence for those charges, which would mean exposing information important to his ongoing investigation.
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2018/07/paul-manafort-donald-trump-russia-collusion/
Paul Manafort is set to go on trial Tuesday, but it wont be for conspiring with Russians to help elect President Donald Trump. In a hearing last week in US District Court in Alexandria, Virginia, Greg Andres, a top prosecutor under Special Counsel Robert Mueller, said that prosecutors dont intend to mention alleged collusion with the Russians during the trial of Donald Trumps former campaign chairman on tax evasion and bank fraud charges.
Nor have prosecutors accused Manafort of conspiring with Moscow as part of a separate case in Washington, DC, scheduled to go to trial in September, in which Manafort faces charges that include money laundering, fraud, illegal lobbying, and obstruction of justice.
Trump and some of his defenders contend that Muellers prosecution of Manafort on charges unrelated to collaboration with Russia during the 2016 election means such evidence does not exist. But that is a flawed assumption. The special counsel has constructed cases that offer the best chance of convicting Manafort, building on investigations that began years before the 2016 race. If Manafort is convicted, prosecutors may hope to use what could essentially amount to a life sentence to push him to cooperate with their broader investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 campaign.
Mueller also has reason to avoid charging Manafort now with crimes that might involve conspiracy with Russians. (Though collusion is not a crime, prosecutors could bring conspiracy charges against Americans involved in disseminating emails or data stolen from Democrats.) Doing so would require Mueller to publicly share evidence for those charges, which would mean exposing information important to his ongoing investigation.
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2018/07/paul-manafort-donald-trump-russia-collusion/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 876 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Case Against Paul Manafort You Won't Hear at His Trial (Original Post)
Miles Archer
Jul 2018
OP
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)1. Bookmark! Manafort Trial For Dummies guide!
paranoid floyd
(254 posts)2. A must read to get up to speed.
One commenter on the story that is so spot on in terms of the length of the investigation that another commenter was whining about;
So let it play out. Given the way the GOP has Benghazied Hillary, it's your turn to sit quietly while the courts work this out.