General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFunny. Nicole Wallace is subbing for Rachel and wearing all black
Like Rachel usually does. I wonder if it's part of the deal when replacing Rachel..
dubyadiprecession
(7,341 posts)a kennedy
(35,556 posts)madaboutharry
(42,031 posts)She does an excellent job on her own show.
kstewart33
(6,552 posts)The ratings for her show are huge.
JCMach1
(29,141 posts)Former Republican, but she has a brain...
trueblue2007
(19,141 posts)she isn't a Republican
stopbush
(24,788 posts)chillfactor
(7,694 posts)so I turned to CNN to watch Chris Cuomo.....I usually catch him on reruns but he has a very good program today and I get to watch it in real time.
Raine
(31,120 posts)malaise
(294,165 posts)Not watching Nicole Wallace in Prime Ime
Mrs. Overall
(6,839 posts)She's the only Rachel sub who I enjoy watching.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Rachel's staff did the research. She's a newsreader, a presenter. No big deal.
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)Plus, Rachel likely pre-approved a list of people that could sub for her and Nicole was one of those people.
oasis
(53,433 posts)She allows them to guide viewers through the issues. Her format and interview style differs from Rachel, but also yields valuable information.
dhol82
(9,638 posts)I enjoy her show at 4pm but question why MSNBC has suddenly put her into Rachels time slot.
drray23
(8,643 posts)dhol82
(9,638 posts)Blue_true
(31,261 posts)I think Sarah Palin was a writing on the wall moment for Nicole.
dhol82
(9,638 posts)If she had a change of heart after the whole Bimbo Barbie episode I would be more accepting.
As I said, I do enjoy her show and she has great guests.
Heard that she was on The View as the token conservative. That made my skin crawl.
Guess it will take some more time to totally accept her.
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)The only former republican that I trust is Liz Warren, but she has long been the real deal as a progressive.
moondust
(21,257 posts)When she introduced Steve Schmidt she said something to the effect that she and Steve had worked together with "someone who could see Russia from her house."
Cosmocat
(15,374 posts)1) during an earlier segment in the show, one of her guests, a democratic strategist, was saying we should do what the Republicans would do if it was a Democratic president right now, she cut him off and loudly said "what lie?"
2) her last segment was on LeBron, and the new school that he opened. She talked about him like one of our liberal folks would have talked about him, just gushed.
She pretty much hates Republicans at this point. Her shows are just absolute blood lettings against republicans.
drray23
(8,643 posts)She covers events related to Trump. She really does not like Trump. Kinda like her former colleague Steve Schmitt who also despise Trump, yet they both used to work for McCain and Bush.
dubyadiprecession
(7,341 posts)and we will see her subbing for Rachel in the future?
drray23
(8,643 posts)She is dumb as a box of rocks and completely brainwashed.
Generic Brad
(14,374 posts)And that is if we are incarcerated in the same prison as her and watching her on the penitentiarys closed circuit tv.
oasis
(53,433 posts)with regularity. He doesn't disappoint.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)I don't understand the haters here.
obnoxiousdrunk
(3,110 posts)manor321
(3,344 posts)No discussion of the Murray Waas piece. Instead inane conversation about nothing.
oasis
(53,433 posts)He's making good sense about the survival of the Republican Party.
Very informative show tonight. Repeats at 9:00 pacific.
donkeypoofed
(2,188 posts)But she is so darn likeable and has a very good show that I can't not watch her.
Chris Cuomo also has a good show and I watch when it's repeated for the west coast as often as I can.
AnnieBW
(12,654 posts)OMG, she's terrible! She sounds like she's reading the teleprompter in a monotone!
Awsi Dooger
(14,565 posts)I had no idea she was subbing for Rachel. I turned to MSNBC and saw Nicole Wallace with Steve Schmidt promised later, so I stayed throughout.
If it had been Rachel I would have clicked away to Cuomo. I can only tolerate Rachel's style for so long.
blogslut
(39,110 posts)TeamPooka
(25,577 posts)Nicole has come in the from the cold, as it were...
stopbush
(24,788 posts)and then when people like Nicole and Steve Schmidt do just that we say ugh. Fuck them.
Smart.
Luciferous
(6,565 posts)oasis
(53,433 posts)quickesst
(6,309 posts).... At the Nicole Wallace haters. They profess their love and respect for Rachel Maddow, but do not trust nor respect her judgment in choosing a replacement for her show.
Upthevibe
(10,108 posts)Sarah Palin DEFINITELY pushed her and Steve over the edge. The movie Game Change was excellent. It's all about the 2008 Election - Nicole and Steve were both portrayed in the movie as major characters and were played by Sarah Paulson and Woody Harrelson. I really enjoyed Nicole when she was on the view. In fact, her contract wasn't renewed because:
"Nicolle Wallace Axed As The View Regular After Proving Herself Insufficiently Shrill And Kardashian Illiterate" (Deadline Hollywood, July 15, 2015)
dhol82
(9,638 posts)Was having a problem visualizing her as the token conservative shill on that program.
lamp_shade
(15,402 posts)eppur_se_muova
(41,298 posts)Nicolle's first appearance on MSNBC, AFAIK, was as a guest on Rachel's show. After a few more appearances she got recruited by MSNBC.
