Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,170 posts)
Sat Aug 4, 2018, 03:06 PM Aug 2018

After '08 Meltdown, Banks Still Play With Financial Fire

It’s been a decade since the global financial crisis rocked the world. In the years since 2008, the U.S. and other countries put together the pieces of their broken economies, assessing what went wrong and trying to curb the abuses that could lead to another crisis. But today many factors that contributed to the implosion still pose a threat.

Although Wall Street may not go gaga over home loans as it did leading up to the last panic, it’s only a question of time before the next speculative frenzy hits. Even with regulations in place, competition and greed push Wall Street to find a new way to get rich quick. And when it does, these four factors will make the ensuing financial crisis all the worse.

1. Big banks hold even more assets than before the crisis

One of the contributing factors to the 2008 global financial crisis was that so few banks owned so many assets. The top five banks owned nearly 45% of financial assets leading up to the crisis, and they own slightly more today (more than 46%). The top 10 banks control more than 55% of total assets. America’s approximately 5,700 other banks control the remaining 45%.

Concentration in itself is not worrisome. There’s no reason big banks can’t keep making smart decisions. But concentration of assets becomes catastrophic when those banks are all doing the same (dumb) thing, such as writing poor loans or gambling against the value of homes via sophisticated insurance contracts (credit default swaps). Then other smart financial institutions are not large enough to step in and bail out the failing ones. So the government has to intervene.

Skip To Content
Skip To Footer
Sign in
en


Florida lobster fishermen fear trade…

The freshest ideas are in small grocery stores

After '08 meltdown, banks still play with…

Fast cash source can strengthen your…

This retired couple makes $75,000 a year…

Why Toyota prices could jump by…

Big Oil cheers quietly as Trump moves to…

Cramer's game plan: Keep an eye on…

What to do now if you think you'll owe the…

China unveils retaliatory tariffs on…

Hundreds line up for gushing West Texas…

Stocks end higher as Apple adds to $1…

MoviePass' parent company lost 97…

How brokers can make 10 times more on…

Seattle housing market under pressure as…

SEC drops probe into Exxon's climate…

Economy added a disappointing…

The case for the 4-day workweek

US trade deficit widens for the first time in 4…

Bezos throws cash and engineers at rocket…

Walmart enters Whole Foods' territory with…

Opinion: The expensive education of Mark…

So your wife embezzled $500,000…

A new type of cheap health care plan is…

3 ways to boost your Social Security…

Student loans are ending an alarming…

The 5 best dividend stocks to buy, hands…

What will cause the next recession? Here…

The Trump admin is headed for a gigantic…

Why Fiat Chrysler has to turn Jeep around

US mends ties with allies, prepares for…

Japan just dethroned China as world's…

Apple hits $1 trillion stock market valuation


After ’08 Meltdown, Banks Still Play With Financial Fire
James Royal, Ph.D. 5 hrs ago

The freshest ideas are in small grocery stores

Fast cash source can strengthen your finances or destroy them

© NerdWallet
It’s been a decade since the global financial crisis rocked the world. In the years since 2008, the U.S. and other countries put together the pieces of their broken economies, assessing what went wrong and trying to curb the abuses that could lead to another crisis. But today many factors that contributed to the implosion still pose a threat.
Although Wall Street may not go gaga over home loans as it did leading up to the last panic, it’s only a question of time before the next speculative frenzy hits. Even with regulations in place, competition and greed push Wall Street to find a new way to get rich quick. And when it does, these four factors will make the ensuing financial crisis all the worse.

Are we 10 years wiser? See more tips on preparing — and prospering
1. Big banks hold even more assets than before the crisis
One of the contributing factors to the 2008 global financial crisis was that so few banks owned so many assets. The top five banks owned nearly 45% of financial assets leading up to the crisis, and they own slightly more today (more than 46%). The top 10 banks control more than 55% of total assets. America’s approximately 5,700 other banks control the remaining 45%.
Concentration in itself is not worrisome. There’s no reason big banks can’t keep making smart decisions. But concentration of assets becomes catastrophic when those banks are all doing the same (dumb) thing, such as writing poor loans or gambling against the value of homes via sophisticated insurance contracts (credit default swaps). Then other smart financial institutions are not large enough to step in and bail out the failing ones. So the government has to intervene.
And whereas the banks may steer clear of speculative excess today, competition virtually ensures that, eventually, Wall Street will do dumb things again.
2. Banks retain high leverage

The banking sector is particularly prone to blowups because it uses a lot of debt (i.e., leverage), writing large loans against a small down payment. This is normal for the industry and is not especially worrisome, if banks are operated prudently. Here’s how the situation stacks up now versus 2008. Banks are using just a bit less leverage than previously (a higher percentage means less leverage).

During good times leverage works wonders, because it rapidly increases the bank’s profitability. That’s why banks would like to use more leverage. But leverage does the opposite in bad times. When the value of houses plummets, banks are required to write off that value on their books, making the bank even more leveraged. If leverage keeps rising, the bank effectively becomes bankrupt. That’s why there is stringent regulation surrounding how much leverage a bank can take on, and why further regulations were developed in the aftermath of the crisis.

-more-

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/after-’08-meltdown-banks-still-play-with-financial-fire/ar-BBKPTNz?li=BBnbfcN

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»After '08 Meltdown, Banks...