General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI'm confused about the Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez bashing
She is a democrat. I have seen a few posts tonight that are putting her down.
DU has rules: Support Democrats.
caraher
(6,279 posts)We're in a battle for Congress that we cannot lose. Who has the time or energy for this right now? Elect Democrats this November. We shouldn't be fighting over who is a "true" Democrat or who should be the next Speaker of the House. The only thing that matters about the next speaker is that it not be a Republican.
vlyons
(10,252 posts)That the rules don't apply to them. That expressing their criticism is more important than following a "silly" rule (silly from their view). When actually, not following the DU rules, denotes a lack of self-discipline. There are plenty of web sites, where it's not against their rules to bash a Dem. They should go there to express their criticism. That's why we have alerts and juries on posts that break the rules. If you think a post breaks a DU rule, by all means file an alert about it.
In the past month or so, I have filed maybe a dozen or so alerts, when previously I never posted one. Which leads me to suspect that either we have trolls in our midst, or we have some undisciplined egos, or both.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)You are not alone in your observation.
msongs
(67,453 posts)Equinox Moon
(6,344 posts)We don't need any negative democrat posts. Times up on that game.
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)Glamrock
(11,802 posts)We have a winner! Same thing happening with a certain Muslim Dem from Minnesota tonight.
Equinox Moon
(6,344 posts)Glamrock
(11,802 posts)While completely disregarding this one:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100210994238
Equinox Moon
(6,344 posts)It is a bit messy two days before MN primaries with both Ellison and Swanson having fresh scandals. You know the timing of it is what makes all so fishy, even if I don't know the details.
Glamrock
(11,802 posts)But the media has looked into it repeatedly and concluded there's no there there. Im guessing if he wasn't so close to a certain Senator, there'd be a more vociferous defense being mounted.
Equinox Moon
(6,344 posts)And people don't take the time to look into it. This will probably cost him the primary.
Beartracks
(12,821 posts)It's OK if you're a Republican.
======
Equinox Moon
(6,344 posts)I sure don't
Beartracks
(12,821 posts)Equinox Moon
(6,344 posts)I guess I need to get out my spy-craft code-breaking book to be on DU.
Beartracks
(12,821 posts)=====
Rhiannon12866
(206,075 posts)I've seen that before and meant to look it up!
sheshe2
(83,927 posts)Native American, Woman, LGBT.
Glamrock
(11,802 posts)We're talking about a completely different subject. Let's leave the what-about-ism to fox news, shall we.
Cha
(297,715 posts)it but you can't mention Sharice Davids or that's "whataboutism" and accusing you of being like fox.
See how that works?
rpannier
(24,339 posts)I will admit to be at a loss about the Muslim Dem and what is up with Sharice Davids?
Eliot Rosewater
(31,121 posts)of...never mind
I give up.
Hug your kids, while a certain group DEMANDS we do this and do that, the GOP will retain power and the KGB will start building the camps.
Equinox Moon
(6,344 posts)I can support all dems, with the exception of republicans running on a dem ticket. That is not the case here.
R B Garr
(16,985 posts)That comment is even in one of her promo ads.
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)It's really quite an obvious observation.
R B Garr
(16,985 posts)of the right kind of Democrat are more important than anyone elses. It sounds divisive. Maybe thats what people notice.
Madam Mossfern
(2,340 posts)She should not be divisive - she should be supporting Democrats and bashing Republicans. Because she seems to denigrate Democrats, there are those who speak out against that behavior. I didn't know that there were two sets of rules.
womanofthehills
(8,774 posts)She supports the dems she in is tune with. We all have our favorites.
Madam Mossfern
(2,340 posts)she needs to (is that better?) support all Democrats, not just the ones that she's "in tune with."
rpannier
(24,339 posts)But at this point it is probably best to move on
For clarification purposes: Joe Manchin and his 'I'm more an independent. But my brand is Democrat.'
Bettie
(16,129 posts)I suspect that a lot of them are hoping that either the Republican wins so they can say "I told you so!" or that the guy she won the primary against wins as a third party candidate so they can say "I told you so".
Voltaire2
(13,194 posts)Bradshaw3
(7,529 posts)She's a Bernie Dem so I look at who is posting and it's the usual suspects. Constructive criticism is fine but it often seems to be taking joy in attacks on her. Do I agree with her on everything - no - and does she need to do better - yes?
But she is, after all, the Democratic nominee. I support her and Joe Manchin and everyone in between who has a D after their name on the November ballot, regardless of who they supported in 2016.
Power 2 the People
(2,437 posts)Every day there is an obligatory "Bernie is really corrupt" thread and "AOC is not to be trusted" thread. It's always the same handful of posters gleefully but passive-aggressively promoting the negativity. They need to just concentrate on getting friends,co-workers and associates to VOTE BLUE.
Bradshaw3
(7,529 posts)That last line is what we all need to remember is the only thing that counts. Taking back at least one branch of government.
Onyrleft
(344 posts)Just as you should never trust anyone who still engages in the Bernie VS Hillary wristcutting hogwash; you should never trust anyone who bashes her.
Cha
(297,715 posts)Cha
(297,715 posts)is brimming with it.
Me.
(35,454 posts)kstewart33
(6,551 posts)Don't trust anyone who has an opinion that differs from yours? A bit much, don't you think?
Eliot Rosewater
(31,121 posts)stonecutter357
(12,697 posts)Cha
(297,715 posts)lol
stonecutter357
(12,697 posts)Cha
(297,715 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)...not bashed her.
I've been a Democrat since the early 1970s, I resent being called a "Repugnantscum rat fucker"!
question everything
(47,537 posts)are being used to scare independents and former Trump voters who have had it with him.
We need these voters and it is too much to explain that she only represents her district.
I wish that she just concentrate on her district. On the way congress work, on what she wants to achieve in small steps. I doubt that she would look at Hillary Clinton and Al Franken as role models. Both were well known with richer track records than she, but both sat quietly in the back benches to learn the ropes.
She is going to find out, soon enough, that in Congress she will just be one of 425 members with no power. And, yes, every stumble of her will be magnified. Not on DU, necessarily, but in the country.
Equinox Moon
(6,344 posts)question everything
(47,537 posts)Expressing concerns about her dominating the elections is not bashing. I think that those of us that really see the importance of taking the House are worried that instead of convincing independents about the need to replace Republicans Ocacio-Cortez is a distraction that may harm other races that are not 90% Democrats.
I think that many here who are active in campaigns that are not sure would rather she did not dominate the news, here, too.
Equinox Moon
(6,344 posts)Yet, I am not seeing the posts you mention: "Expressing concerns about her dominating the elections is not bashing." I see a lot of energy going into negativity.
KPN
(15,662 posts)Dems, she should shut the fuck up and stay home. Is that it? Cuz thats what it sounds like.
Does that hold for Nancy Pelosi, Elizabeth Warren, Maxine Waters and quite a few other Dems as well?
Is everybody here a Democrat or am I mistaken?
George II
(67,782 posts)...Elizabeth Warren several years. They are long past only winning their first primary and have won a number of general elections. I don't know why you're comparing her to them.
Second, I don't think any of those three have traveled around the country campaigning against other Democrats in the primaries. For the most part, Democrats don't take a position for/against other Democrats in primaries outside of their own districts or states.
KPN
(15,662 posts)match my general recollection. All of this is very perplexing why Dems here attack other Dems. The idea that it isnt an attack is also nonsense.
George II
(67,782 posts)Link to tweet
?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1013540404879396865&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fthehill.com%2Fhomenews%2Fcampaign%2F395104-ocasio-cortez-responds-to-duckworth-saying-policies-too-far-to-the-left
If you look at the primary results in Michigan and Kansas, perhaps Tammy Duckworth was correct.
KPN
(15,662 posts)reading too much into the primaries. Welder and El-Sayed had respectable showings in KS and MI. Their presence moved the goalpost for Dem candidates in those States as did Bernie's in 2015-16. That's good enough for me. Progressives are gaining. That's the objective. I'm happy.
nini
(16,672 posts)R B Garr
(16,985 posts)Equinox Moon
(6,344 posts)We need to be supporting dems and save our democracy.
nini
(16,672 posts)Fuck that crap.
Equinox Moon
(6,344 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)The OP's "confusion" is disinenuous, IMO.
Eliot Rosewater
(31,121 posts)radical noodle
(8,013 posts)any poster here doesn't support her candidacy.
I DO think she'd be better off to pay attention to her own district right now. Show them that Democrats care about their constituents and want to know what can be done to benefit them. She should meet with them, have town halls to get opinions and learn their issues.
She's new, people will be watching her because of the media attention she got.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)CentralMass
(15,265 posts)From what I see negative comments about her are usually made as replies when someone pushes her for President. It seems to be due to her leading the charge against Al Franken, and possible the opportunistic manner in which she seems to obtain her political goals.
I maybe wrong but it seems that Gabbard us being attacked by the anti-Sanders faction.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,438 posts)This
Response to Equinox Moon (Original post)
Post removed
Beartracks
(12,821 posts)Cuz, yeah, we need to win as many seats as possible. Period.
======
oberliner
(58,724 posts)PatrickforO
(14,592 posts)Are we all going straight blue in November or what?
Response to Equinox Moon (Original post)
Post removed
Lunabell
(6,111 posts)You know the kind. Progressive.
dansolo
(5,376 posts)When he bashes ALL Democrats.
Lunabell
(6,111 posts)Not Bernie Sanders, who is not Democrat.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Seems to be a popular target.
CentralMass
(15,265 posts)However there are pretty much daily attack on Sanders and candidates that align with him.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Pull up any thread where she is mentioned.
CentralMass
(15,265 posts)However there is a backlash effect. Some people who like and support Al Franken have developed a dislike or distrust of Gillibrand. However they aren't going out of their way to post their own stories
bashing her.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)Last edited Mon Aug 13, 2018, 10:33 AM - Edit history (1)
And rightfully so but she is still supported. AOC takes a breath, misspeaks and is piled on. She's tainted you know.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)CentralMass
(15,265 posts)Midnight Writer
(21,803 posts)She is just one (potentially) of 435 House Members, for a brief two year term. Either she will learn, adapt and move forward, or not.
I don't understand the bright spotlight or the harsh criticism.
She is a talented rookie player for my team, and she has my support in this, her first year as a player.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)womanofthehills
(8,774 posts)Dems outnumber Republicans 6-1 in that district - so you think all those dems are going to vote for an old Republican white guy who is barely campaigning over a women who is big time out there?
UCmeNdc
(9,601 posts)OnDoutside
(19,974 posts)the Republicans e.g. "Let's abolish ICE" has already been used against all Democrats. Whether you agree with her statement or not, we are always told that words matter. It's just that in this case, words matter negatively. And there is the added ire that someone who has yet to even get inside the doors of Congress is going around the country stumping for others, including trying to take incumbent Dems down. People tend to get their backs up over that sort of thing.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)She won the primary. Throughout the primary (that she won) she promoted the idea of abolishing ICE. After she won the primary, she was given a variety of public platforms. Why would she not continue to promote the ideas that she promoted during her primary campaign? It's what she believes in. It's one of the reasons she ran a primary challenge to a Democratic incumbent in the first place.
OnDoutside
(19,974 posts)the entire Democratic Party with. It's not about her, it's about the Democratic Party, in the most consequential election of your and my lifetime.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)OnDoutside
(19,974 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)She is not going to abandon it now, nor should she.
Its time to abolish ICE" was literally at the top of her campaign website.
ICE has only existed since 2003 (created by Bush).
OnDoutside
(19,974 posts)change, as you say. It's one thing saying it in her local district, but she's taking it national, and that is what we all should be objecting to, if one has the best interests of the Democratic Party at heart.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)No matter what we say or do, they will come up with some nonsense.
The best approach is for Democrats to say what they believe and stick to their values and principles as AOC is doing.
OnDoutside
(19,974 posts)brush.
SkyDancer
(561 posts)done by the same people who thought she didn't stand a chance in her primary & called her a long shot & what not.
Pay no attention to them, they are a dying breed, literally.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,241 posts)good incumbents. I guess it's a confusing time?
Squinch
(51,021 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)Squinch
(51,021 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)who are trying to do the same thing is bizarre.
stonecutter357
(12,697 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)There are many here in this thread who cite the threat from the GOP as justification for everyone to "LEAVE ALEXANDRIA ALONE!!!" Those individuals tell us that the threat from the GOP is so great that everyone should just give AOC some leeway and stop criticizing her. Uh, yeah right.
If the threat from the GOP is so great, then why isn't AOC going after the GOP candidates with the same "fervor" instead of bashing good incumbents.
All I'm saying is that her "strategy" is not one that seems at all geared toward actually WINNING more seats for Democrats, and it serves no good purpose for anyone to put vanity and egos and pride ABOVE the main objective of regaining our majority. I wish she was on the same page and saw the importance in that. That's all.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)I don't understand why anyone would be surprised that she would want to help other candidates similar to her do the same thing.
R B Garr
(16,985 posts)where other incumbent Democrats are in districts not like her Bronx district, which is about 80% Democrat.
No worries, though. Democrat Crowley is still on the ballot, so a Democrat will take that seat either way -phew!
oberliner
(58,724 posts)He is supporting AOC.
R B Garr
(16,985 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)So why wouldn't she want to help other like-minded candidates do likewise?
Squinch
(51,021 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)She has been terrific.
Squinch
(51,021 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)She helps campaign for like-minded Democratic primary candidates, which makes sense.
When the primary ends, she praises the Democratic winner (even if it's not the candidate she supported) and expresses her strong support for that person in the general election.
Example:
Link to tweet
(Congratulations, @sharicedavids! Your win is an incredible inspiration to so many, myself included.)
Sounds like whatever the opposite of division is to me.
Squinch
(51,021 posts)MuseRider
(34,125 posts)Welder, who was supported by Bernie, also threw his full support behind Sharice who beat him. There were some wonderful stories going around about that but I do not remember them well enough to be able to state them acurately at the moment.
EDIT to add: The point of posting this was to support the idea that winning or losing this does not look like dividing the party to me either.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Which people also seem to have forgotten about.
Nothing wrong with fighting it out in the primary and then coming together in the general.
Power 2 the People
(2,437 posts)Only the criticisms. It's safer to just keep chanting "he's not a Democrat...he's not a Democrat."
RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)Thankfully he won easily. Im sure it was a bitter pill for you.
Response to Equinox Moon (Original post)
Post removed
treestar
(82,383 posts)It was just helpful criticism, but helpful criticism of Bernie is always "bashing."
avebury
(10,952 posts)My concern is when it appears that some democrats might act like their version of what is a democrat should be is the only valid version of a democrat.
We are in a fight for the very existence of this country. The last thing we need is for democrats to turn on each other and eat our own. United we stand a chance, divided we will just play into the hands of the Rethugs and all might be lost.
Democrats, as a whole, must provide a united front. Democrats are sometimes their own worst enemies. Rethugs have mastered the concept of swallowing whatever it takes to achieve their end game and it has proven successful over time, hence the times that we are currently living in.
Our goal needs to be to do whatever it takes to get the Rethugs tossed out.
Kaleva
(36,354 posts)I find that to be interesting.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Kaleva
(36,354 posts)CentralMass
(15,265 posts)Kaleva
(36,354 posts)Look at the threads attacking Hillary and then compare them to the more recent ones attacking Bernie, AOC and OR endorsed candidates.
mcar
(42,376 posts)Under the guise of "constructive criticism."
Calling Democrats "corporatist, Turd Way establishment shills" are some of the phrases seen here regularly. And let's not forget the constant attacks on strong Democratic women like Pelosi. She needs to step aside, some say, because she's....? Have you spoken out about those attacks?
I find it amusing that you think AOC is the only Democrat worthy of DUs rules.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)All I'm trying to say is that the answer to your straightforward question is "no" and "clearly not". Considering how LITTLE time she's spending at home, and the neglect she's showing for her own campaign, I wouldn't be surprised if she lost. What a shame that would be, when we should be focused on defeating the GOP.
mcar
(42,376 posts)This!
Cha
(297,715 posts)her brand of politics didn't work in Michigan's primary for Governor, Kansas' District 3, or Missouri District 1.
Mahalo, mcar.
Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)Equinox Moon
(6,344 posts)Off topic: I don't understand the "ignore" feature. I have zero posters on 'ignore'.
George II
(67,782 posts)....she bashed Crowley (who she defeated), Tammy Duckworth, Kirsten Gilibrand, and others.
ALL Democrats.
Response to Equinox Moon (Original post)
Post removed
nycbos
(6,039 posts)... says many of the statements she is making are not factually true.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100210994189#post36
Fact checking isn't bashing.
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)It calls her statements "False", which they aren't. The article linked in that post doesn't call them false, it calls out inaccuracies in some of the details indicating that the candidate needs to sharpen their message.
The OP makes it much more than that.
As others pointed out, inaccurate details in policy statements are common among all members of Congress and making a mountain out of a molehill by the OP is indeed, bashing a Democratic candidate.
DFW
(54,445 posts)But if one compares the number of Republicans she has traveled to campaign against to the number of Democrats she has traveled to campaign against, I can understand why the strength of her credentials as a Democrat have been perceived to be wobbly at times. Her solidarity with the Party whose nomination she won might increase in credibility if that ratio were reversed.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)It's easy to be a ranting gadfly. It's harder to be an actual leader (see, Sanders, Bernie).
ecstatic
(32,733 posts)She did a good job. She chose her words carefully. She wasn't divisive, which was my main fear with regard to her candidacy. If she continues that way, she'll be fine. Cautiously optimistic for now.
elleng
(131,138 posts)That appears to be good enough for some.
AlexSFCA
(6,139 posts)this means DU must 100% support her. She may help GOTV.
shanny
(6,709 posts)Saboburns
(2,807 posts)It's always been the case.
But I sure have noticed a helluva lot more bashing since the 2016 hacking.
Stories that start, and reinforce, a hurtful narrative on Democratic politicians.
Look around. The Pelosi dashing threads are nearly always the most popular threads here. Same with Ocasio-Cortez threads. She gets more bad press here, more hurtful comments here, than positive ones.
Same with Michael Avennati. That dude has been roasted here Looooooooong before he said he was running last week. DUers couldn't wait to pile on him. Even back when all he did was bash Donald Trump everyday.
It's good we have healthy debate on our party, and our party's candidates. It's good to state your opinions, that's what DU is here for.
But I happen to believe there are provocateurs among us. There are attempts to sully reputations and plant ideas among us that get regurgitated and and become 'commonly knowledge'.
Equinox Moon
(6,344 posts)"I happen to believe there are provocateurs among us." They often are the ones with 20 - 40 thousand posts, for example. They are not new to DU. Are they troll sleeper cells?
aikoaiko
(34,184 posts)...wth a healthy dose of misplaced Bernie hate.
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)A former Bernie Sanders organizer won a primary against an establishment incumbent.
What the hell did you expect to see on DU? Unequivocal support for the Bernie Sanders associate, just because she's now the Democratic nominee? HAHAHAHAHA. You poor naive innocent child.
BTW, here's a thought experiment for you: Suppose that, with Ocasio-Cortez receiving requests for help from Democratic candidates across the country, she had instead rejected them all and stayed solely within her district. In this scenario, she has sudden media prominence but chooses not to use it to help anyone else.
What would be the reaction of some of the people who are now criticizing her for leaving her district? Would they be criticizing her for "selfishly" not leaving her district?
We can never know for sure, but I have my dark suspicions.
Tiggeroshii
(11,088 posts)Even if there are two Democrats competing in the general election.
fallout87
(819 posts)Criticism of her words and actions is being called "bashing".
Are you advocating for an echo chamber here?