Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsManafort didn't need to put on a defense, the judge did it for him. What a sorry state of affairs.
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Manafort didn't need to put on a defense, the judge did it for him. What a sorry state of affairs. (Original Post)
onecaliberal
Aug 2018
OP
One would hope that if things don't turn out because of the judge's blatant interference (...
SWBTATTReg
Aug 2018
#1
They cannot re-try the case unless the Jury hangs. A not guilty verdict is the game.
onecaliberal
Aug 2018
#3
Yep a politician in robes despite what one duer said about him being otherwise
Fullduplexxx
Aug 2018
#5
SWBTATTReg
(26,144 posts)1. One would hope that if things don't turn out because of the judge's blatant interference (...
did the judge interfere because rump called him?) that prosecutors would retry the case...
onecaliberal
(36,594 posts)3. They cannot re-try the case unless the Jury hangs. A not guilty verdict is the game.
Ive said from the beginning of this trial, the judge was against the prosecution. One can only ponder the reasons.
Response to onecaliberal (Original post)
Post removed
uppityperson
(116,002 posts)4. What? Thank you for clarifying
Fullduplexxx
(8,609 posts)5. Yep a politician in robes despite what one duer said about him being otherwise
onecaliberal
(36,594 posts)6. I'm sorry but very experienced prosecutors say this judge was out of line.
I will take their word over the one person here.
Fullduplexxx
(8,609 posts)7. No need to be i do too
