General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsConstitutional Attorney: Guantanamo ‘Nearly Impossible To Close’ Thanks To NDAA
The U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba will not be closing any time soon thanks to President Barack Obamas approval of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), a constitutional attorney whos represented terrorism suspects told Raw Story this week in an exclusive interview.
Even though President Barack Obama made closing Guantanamo one of his core campaign promises in the lead-up to the presidential election in 2008, that promise now appears to be nearly impossible to fulfill thanks to provisions in the new laws, Baher Azmy, legal director of the Center for Constitutional Rights, explained.
As an attorney, Azmy represented Murat Kurnaz, a German who was detained by Pakistani authorities and sold to the U.S. for a bounty. Kurnaz, who even the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) thought was innocent, ended up in Guantanamo at age 19 as a suspected terrorist, and he stayed there for five years without ever facing a criminal charge. Azmy also wrote briefings for the Supreme Court in Boumediene v. Bush, a case which challenged the right of the U.S. military to exclusively detain terrorism suspects.
MORE...
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/01/03/constitutional-attorney-guantanamo-nearly-impossible-to-close-thanks-to-ndaa/
TheWraith
(24,331 posts)Nobody apparently remembers that whole thing back in 2009 when Obama's first executive order was to shut down Gitmo, and it was promptly overridden by Congress.
RC
(25,592 posts)Walk right through the 4 foot thick rock walls or something.
EFerrari
(163,986 posts)ixion
(29,528 posts)Way to support Endless War, Obama.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)needs to decide. Is he going to make everyone happy, and have everyone angry with him, or is he going to do the right thing?
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)Although perhaps a quick consultation with the Constitution, our treaty obligations, and what America has historically stood for might inform the canny incumbent with a pretty clear path, the President can't just go around willy-nilly obeying the law when there's so many yammerers out there ready to pounce with the indefensible position that the United States should stand for indefinite detention without charge, access to counsel, or any other relief.
I'm so old, I remember a time when the United States used to register a very strong objection to such dictatorial procedures.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)we desperately need good ideas that we let go of when the Repukes slithered in.
Solly Mack
(90,758 posts)_ed_
(1,734 posts).