General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMillennials don't suck at voting
Turnout among 18-29 year olds was 50 percent in 2016. That's not terrible, historically speaking.
The first election 18-year-olds could vote, participation in that group was 58 percent (1972), which remains the all-time high.
2000 was the low point at 40 percent. Obama 08 pushed the number up to 52 percent and it went down to 49 percent in 2012. Of course, those are presidential year numbers.
60 percent of them (18-29) voted for Obama in 2012 and 55 percent went for HRC. In 2000, Gore and and Bush tied among 18-24 year-olds at 47 percent. Our buddy Ralph Nader got 5 percent.
Anyway, the kids are alright. I've got a couple of them myself. They vote. They march. They volunteer. One of them does complain about her tax bite though...Can't take these kids for granted.
RandySF
(69,856 posts)I think they just dont care about primaries.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)Pointing out the need for more education in civics/politics.
Awsi Dooger
(14,565 posts)I read it a few hours ago. Lots of stuff. Basically the millennials only have a slightly positive view of the Democratic Party but very negative view of the Republican Party, only 26% to 60% unfavorable.
However, only slightly above half the millennials say they are likely to vote this year, while 8% say they definitely won't vote and 11% probably won't vote and 25% uncertain.
Most demographics view these midterms as roughly the same in importance to past midterms, but a plurality of Asian Americans and Latino Americans view these midterms as more significant than typical
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Some of them suck.
kacekwl
(7,412 posts)It's a banner election if 50% of voters vote. Blows my mind.
frazzled
(18,402 posts)Gen Xers turned out at 62.6%; Boomers at 68.7%; and Seniors at 70.1%.
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/05/12/black-voter-turnout-fell-in-2016-even-as-a-record-number-of-americans-cast-ballots/ft_17-05-12_voterturnout_millennialnew/
BeyondGeography
(39,963 posts)frazzled
(18,402 posts)I dont understand your point. The main lesson is that young people could vote in greater numbers if they cared to. Yes, their numbers have risen and fallen slightly in various years (I think Clinton/Gore in 1992 did the best on youth turnout according to charts Ive seen), but theyve always been at the bottom of voter turnout by age.
Millennial currently make up 30% of the voting age population. But then that means 70% of the voting population are not millennials, and those voters vote in significantly larger numbers.
The only thing for sure is that millennials will grow older, and thus, like generations before them, vote more (and probably somewhat more moderately). And that a new generation of young voters will call them sell-outs. So the world turns.
BeyondGeography
(39,963 posts)The numbers have been a LOT worse than at present (see 2000).
And they can have a big impact on results when you give them a candidate who excites them (Obama).