General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis is a notable find. The language of the Kavanaugh opinion that Kasowitz relied on is here:
This is a notable find. The language of the Kavanaugh opinion that Kasowitz relied on is here: https://www.eenews.net/assets/2018/07/13/document_gw_02.pdf
"The President may decline to prosecute certain violators of federal law just as the President may pardon certain violators of federal law." -->
Kasowitzs memo to Mueller from June 2017 cites a somewhat obscure bit of dicta from a Kavanaugh opinion in 2013 on the presidents ability to end a criminal investigation (it was by Kavanaugh only; the other judge in the panel majority didnt join)
Link to tweet
And here's the relevant part of the Kasowitz letter (as posted by the NYT in June:https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/06/02/us/politics/trump-legal-documents.html#footnote-expanded-1-24 pic.twitter.com/YAr2u9OUZe

Link to tweet
DetlefK
(16,670 posts)malaise
(296,866 posts)Get thee to the greatest page
The_jackalope
(1,660 posts)Odd little coinkydink...
Edited to add: https://www.democraticunderground.com/100211100316
brush
(61,033 posts)Pachamama
(17,565 posts)Trueblue Texan
(4,536 posts)...anyone, including the president, is above the law? Is there anyone who is exempt from accountability under the law?
Baitball Blogger
(52,487 posts)Have they been lying to us this entire time?
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)prosecutions. The wording is important, using the singular and not the plural.
No mention of a President pardoning themselves or of a special counsel investigation which is not a prosecution.
More smoky smoking guns in the emails than this.
calimary
(90,312 posts)Baitball Blogger
(52,487 posts)FakeNoose
(41,936 posts)Are we supposed to believe he's backing up Obama on something?
Trump wasn't POTUS then so it can't be about him.
sarah FAILIN
(2,857 posts)Isn't that crazy?
It wasn't defending Obama though. It was about nuclear regulatory commission. We need to read it, the link is above.
SergeStorms
(20,684 posts)Harris's question to Kavanaugh was if he discussed the Mueller investigation with anyone from Kasowitz's law firm. He couldn't have discussed it with them in 2013. Has Kavanaugh discussed the Mueller investigation with anyone from Kasowitz's law firm? Maybe she does have evidence of that. I hope so, but a decision from 2013 wouldn't have anything to do with it.
meow2u3
(25,250 posts)barbtries
(31,319 posts)he must be stopped.
sarah FAILIN
(2,857 posts)The dissent is by Garland and the whole thing looks very interesting
Hermit-The-Prog
(36,631 posts)More reasons for McCONnell to torpedo Garland and fast-track Kavanaugh.
Are there enough jails to house the Repugnant party?
sarah FAILIN
(2,857 posts)If he gets in, all investigations are over.
dajoki
(10,685 posts)Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)republican lies are dangerous for America
republican lies are dangerous for America
republican lies are dangerous for America
republican lies are dangerous for America
republican lies are dangerous for America
republican lies are dangerous for America
republican lies are dangerous for America
republican lies are dangerous for America
republican lies are dangerous for America
republican lies are dangerous for America
republican lies are dangerous for America
republican lies are dangerous for America
republican lies are dangerous for America
republican lies are dangerous for America
republican lies are dangerous for America
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Thanks for posting this!