Partisan?

[SHRED]

David Gergen calls this fight "sad" and "partisan".

Fuck him.

[spanone]

1. did he say that about republicans and Merrick Garland?

[rurallib]

2. which fight? the SCOTUS nominee, Trump V Woodward or the press or some other?

Mueller v Trump

some other?

[SHRED]

3. This Kavanaugh hearing

[Pachamama]

4. It is sad. It is partisan. Its David Gergen.

Its all fact and it is what it is.

Frankly, I am glad to see the Democrats and Protesters fighting hard and pointing out the issues and partisanship. And frankly the truth about the (Anti)Republic Party

[SHRED]

6. To me using the term "partisan" minimizes this

To me it's a fight for transparency.
It's a fight to get to the truth about this nominee in the public sphere.
It's a fight against those who favor secrecy.

Much bigger than partisanism.

[Pachamama]

7. Indeed it is Shred....which is why its important to focus on the fight and not worry about the term

"partisan"

Important to see the forest for the trees....

[The Velveteen Ocelot]

5. In a sense he's right.

It's sad that it's come to this - that a partisan Supreme Court nominee is being touted by partisan Senators as someone who should be confirmed.

[Nitram]

8. If we do it, it's partisan. If they do it, its patriotic.

[COLGATE4]

9. For Gergen the only time is isn't "partisan"

is when Rethugs do it.