Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(70,299 posts)
Fri Sep 7, 2018, 06:22 PM Sep 2018

** Five Times Brett Kavanaugh Appears to Have Lied to Congress While Under Oath

Seriously, what can Democrats do about this now??









Five Times Brett Kavanaugh Appears to Have Lied to Congress While Under Oath

Pesky documents keep surfacing to contradict the nominee’s claims about his past.
Pema Levy and Dan FriedmanSep. 6, 2018 6:43 PM

Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh appears before the Senate Judiciary Committee for his confirmation hearings. Erin Scott/ZUMA


Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh has made declarations under oath during his current and past confirmation hearings that are contradicted by documents from his time as a counsel to the president and staff secretary in the George W. Bush White House. Newly released documents have undermined Kavanaugh’s declarations to the Senate Judiciary Committee, contradictions that are drawing close scrutiny from many Democrats. Kavanaugh has denied making any misleading or false statements.

His role in accessing stolen documents: In 2002, a GOP aide on the Senate Judiciary Committee, Manuel Miranda, stole thousands of documents belonging to the committee’s Democratic staff. At the time, Kavanaugh was a White House lawyer working on judicial nominations, which included working alongside Miranda. In 2003, President Bush nominated Kavanaugh to his current position on the DC Circuit Court of Appeals and his confirmation hearing was held in 2004—though he was not confirmed until two years later. During his 2004 hearing, Kavanaugh denied ever receiving any of the documents Miranda stole. Asked if he “ever come across memos from internal files of any Democratic members given to you or provided to you in any way?” he replied, “No.” In 2006, also under oath, he again denied ever receiving stolen documents.

But newly released documents show that Miranda had indeed sent Kavanaugh information from the stolen internal documents. The nominee continues to deny he knew the information was stolen. But he can no longer deny he received it.


Warrantless wiretapping: At a 2006 confirmation hearing, Kavanaugh told Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) that he knew nothing of the NSA’s warrantless wiretapping program, launched under President George W. Bush, until the New York Times revealed it publicly in 2005. Kavanaugh insisted he’d heard “nothing at all” about the program before that, even though he was a senior administration aide. But a September 17, 2001 email provided to the New York Times this week shows that Kavanaugh was involved in at least initial discussions about the widespread surveillance of phones that characterized the NSA program. In the email to John Yoo, then a Justice Department lawyer, Kavanaugh asked about the Fourth Amendment implications of “random/constant surveillance of phone and e-mail conversations of non-citizens who are in the United States when the purpose of the surveillance is to prevent terrorist/criminal violence?” Kavanaugh said Wednesday that his 2006 testimony was “100 percent accurate.” But the email, which describes the gist of the wiretapping program, which Bush approved in 2002, calls Kavanaugh’s claims of ignorance into question.

Torture:.
..............




4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
** Five Times Brett Kavanaugh Appears to Have Lied to Congress While Under Oath (Original Post) riversedge Sep 2018 OP
Publicize now, make him fear impeachment after November marylandblue Sep 2018 #1
Not sure what they can do Andy823 Sep 2018 #2
The Democrats on the Judiciary Commitee madaboutharry Sep 2018 #3
Kavanaugh Should Be Disbarred dlk Sep 2018 #4

Andy823

(11,495 posts)
2. Not sure what they can do
Fri Sep 7, 2018, 06:34 PM
Sep 2018

I am afraid that there isn't much they can do as long as all the republicans vote for him, and it looks like they will. They are pretty much afraid of Trump, for one reason or another. Personally I think he has something on most of them, and they know that he will destroy them one way or another if they cross him. He rules by fear and threats, and it seems to be working for him. We need to get out and vote republicans out of office this year, and at least then Democrats can do something to slow Trump down.

madaboutharry

(40,219 posts)
3. The Democrats on the Judiciary Commitee
Fri Sep 7, 2018, 06:36 PM
Sep 2018

need to hold a press conference and call Kavanaugh a perjurer and commit to impeaching him if he is put on the court. Kavanaugh has no respect for the rule of law. He should also be removed from The DC court.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»** Five Times Brett Kavan...